dark light

flateric

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 692 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2297742
    flateric
    Participant

    I’m pretty sure that pic is a photoshop. The colouring inside the intakes looks like bad CGI.

    this is not PS. do you have any idea of how movable inlet ramp looks/work like and what is EXIF? seems that answer is ‘no’ in both cases

    intake ramp on tarmac photo is up, showing faceted walls running straight vertically down to the place to which ramp moves down at cruise flight
    T-50-6 model photo shows intake ramp in cruise, moved down to the max

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2297888
    flateric
    Participant

    Which is excellent news since it was supposed to fly before the end of 2011.:rolleyes: Oh well, we cant do anything other than just wait.

    well, thrust me, I heard ‘before the end of 2011’ by my own ears) but **** happens

    meantime, at roundtable in Russian Sandia Labs/Livermore – town of Sarov:

    “Obviously, we will make it. This is not a question now. The technological hurdles are solved. And we will do that fast enough “- said the prime minister.
    “T-50 is going to be better than the U.S. fifth-generation aircraft. It also becomes obvious to all professionals, “- said Putin. “Several new aircrafts will fly this year”

    http://vz.ru/news/2012/2/24/563859.html

    elections are close, in one word…

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2297892
    flateric
    Participant

    pafka seems to include both carotted dual compression and dsi like a hybrid

    :confused::eek:

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2298050
    flateric
    Participant

    Any news about the T50-4 Flateric?

    recent citation from Pogosyan: “T-50-4 fill fly till the end of 2012”

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2298097
    flateric
    Participant

    F-23 (not YF-23) was designed to have DSI intakes

    that’s not true

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2298795
    flateric
    Participant

    I highly doubt sukhoi designers & software specialists in Moscow will be making less.

    well, you will be surprised, but lack of qualified workers wiped out in 90s now lead to situation when СNС machine operator in private sector may earn $5000 while say Tactical Missiles Corp.can offer him no more than $1000-1500. institute degree may expect $700-800 at design bureau at first time. many wages ads are just …ads, like this Sukhoi DB Moscow office vacancies page http://www.sukhoi.org/vacancy/invite/ promising $1500 /month.
    grOOmi that you have probably heard of and who’s in charge of programming for СNC that makes for example titanium bulkhead ot T-50 should skip two or more free Saturdays a month and work extra hours to reach $1000 point

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2299301
    flateric
    Participant

    as I always say, German Tiger was a way more sophisticated engineering creature than T-34-85
    surprisingly, that ended bad for Nazis
    what could Davidenko create having tens(!) times less in budget than Lockheed did have for ATF with engineering staff on payroll of 1000 bucks per month? an aircraft that reportedly three times cheaper that Raptor, targeted for agility (yes, may be in expense of ultra-LO), with weapon bays sized for much wider A-A and ATG nomenclature, with much more sophisticated (at least in plans) multi-band, multi-array radar system, electro-optical sensors, built-in EW and DIRCM
    as any ‘first’ it will be a hard way of learning after years of aerospace industry in limbo – there were many problems and delays in program (and I expect more and don’t believe in overoptimistic IOC dates), but T-50 is destined to be a milestone in Russian fighter development

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2300009
    flateric
    Participant

    afres reading author’s revelations of that ‘117M'(?) engines are installed on T-50 and early T-50s will have radar from Su-35 (obvious problems with geometry he has), his credibility goes in death spiral. he should be sniffing forums better next time.

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2321062
    flateric
    Participant

    no problem.. they could license build an aircraft from their closest ally, Tejas with Kaveri engine!

    thanks, but we can invent something more appropriate
    especially more appropriate than Kaveri

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2321560
    flateric
    Participant

    flateric,what about the surprise u promised us 😎 🙂

    surprise should be surprise, otherwise it’s not a surprise surprise

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2321565
    flateric
    Participant

    What experience does Sukhoi have with building UCAV’s? Are there any in operation?

    0/0
    there were many design studies though starting back in early 80s

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2322623
    flateric
    Participant

    Can i pull your tongue about that E-721 again ?:rolleyes: Is it indeed like the description on paralay, an aircraft not unlike J-20 ( canards, side intakes etc etc )?

    all was said that E-721 was a ‘development of 1.44/1.42 ideas’. after J-20 appeared, some ex-MiG workers said it looks in line of post 1.42 studies made by another new design team in early 00s (poor bird has changed two or three chief designers in her history)

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2322627
    flateric
    Participant

    Sukhoi got money for heavy, X-47B class strike UCAV project
    MiG is in limbo

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2323639
    flateric
    Participant

    And I wonder does all manufacturers has the heavy 5th gen. fighter concepts or someone develops the lightweight 5th gen fighter?

    PAK FA was intended to be somewhat in the middle of F-22A/F-35 class – cheaper, more affordable flying compromise- even with extreme STOL ability at the earliest stage (Yakovlev would be merging efforts with winning contender, , playing as sub-contractor, but stepped out of game in 2005 when overdue STOL requirements became less stringent with its expertise), that has grown closer to F-22 during design stage
    LMFS – lightweight single-(preferable design concept) or two engine fighter, Indian AMCA can be an example of such proposal
    both Sukhoi and MiG have plenty LMFS-class projects under the sleeve, but now LMFS is no more

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2323735
    flateric
    Participant

    And the only alternative T-50 is the Sukhoi engineer’s independent 2005 proposal, is it right?

    how could you…MiG guys with their E-721 entry are grumpy now:)
    and please stop mixing LMFS projects and PAK FA ones

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 692 total)