Optionally manned?
yes…like other NG LRS/NGLRS/NGB studies
FLATERIC i am talking serious,NOT joking.at least i expres my opinions i would like u to do the same
my opinion is that any serious talks of 2D nozzles can safely be postponed till we see second stage prototype engine, that’s another 4 or 5 years
You’r right of course. Excegerated things a bit too mouch there. Its just that so mouch nonsense is written about it by noobs who want to spin the whole debate in their own favour.
But official data from Sukhoi etc, thats a different story all together.
note that these are noobs of their sort, too (you havent’t heard that noobs from OKB MiG say of T-50, no?) whatever – best advice is to get degree in aerospace and make your own conclusions. In real life truth is somewhere between.
i mean sukhoi and saturn can develop its ows desing of stealth nozzles 🙂
are you ready to pay for these? tell me your credit card No. and CVC
this model presented at maks 2011 has bort number 56 .do u think 6 prototype will look like this model ?
there will be some subtle differences
i think some unstealthy features are done with purpuse
which ones? this is just 1:10 scale display model made on CNC machine using original T-50 NX database to shorten production time (that’s why it was secured every night with canvas and sealed steel wires)
f-35 nozzle isnt that stealthy as flat nozzles of f-22,dr karl copp has clearly said this.
Quite may be. What the price of this margin in terms of money and RCS reduction? Does he say that?
I did not claim to know anything technical about it. Especially regarding RCS.
then, may be, you’d be more modest with statements? and go for less “??!!” and “!!!”
the only major problem that i see is the engine intake,which the fan can be seen with eyes,and second problen is engine nozzles !
I see the major problem that you don’t care to read what others have said for thousand times already
…and F-35 designers somehow feel comfortable with her nozzle, no?
And what do you know about the underbody, really? Tell me all about it.
may be you will be first? proceed…
I feel more could be done in terms of stealth shaping, specifically the engines/nozzles and the underbody.
Panzerkampfwagen VI was far more advanced in technology than T-34…but didn’t win the war.
external changes to production version will be barely visible according to Segey Bogdan interview at MAKS. My 5 kopeks for radar blockers installation, implementing RAM – that’s all. enough is enough. once more, T-50 is not ‘YF-22ski’ and was created from the beginning as EMD series F/A-22s
while Marchukov did tell of 2D nozzles, it’s a long way from talks to practice, and now I give less chance for them to appear on finalized version (Davidenko/Pogosyan patent of swiveling nozzles to hide IR radiation is another proof to my theory). I would be pleased to be proven wrong.
And, of course, FGFA will have wings structure fitted for Mr.Pillai’s favorite child. Seems that’s why MKIs still can’t carry ’em)
Yes, it isn’t a S-duct, the necessary condition for S-duct is that straight line be blocked while it going through without additional device.
I’m not sure if your definition of S-duct match that one used by aerodynamicists )
first and last Vega/Kulon Aist UAV flight in 2009
designed by famous Vyacheslav Kondratyev, this UAV (intended for Iskander targeting), crashed because of FBW glitches, ending this highly controversial (and expensive) program
I’d guess the main reason why nothing has come of it is the lack of necessity
main reason name was Mikhail Petrovich S.