dark light

flateric

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 692 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A glimpse into future US Fighter and Bomber design #2310997
    flateric
    Participant

    Optionally manned?

    yes…like other NG LRS/NGLRS/NGB studies

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2311024
    flateric
    Participant

    FLATERIC i am talking serious,NOT joking.at least i expres my opinions i would like u to do the same

    my opinion is that any serious talks of 2D nozzles can safely be postponed till we see second stage prototype engine, that’s another 4 or 5 years

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2311034
    flateric
    Participant

    You’r right of course. Excegerated things a bit too mouch there. Its just that so mouch nonsense is written about it by noobs who want to spin the whole debate in their own favour.
    But official data from Sukhoi etc, thats a different story all together.

    note that these are noobs of their sort, too (you havent’t heard that noobs from OKB MiG say of T-50, no?) whatever – best advice is to get degree in aerospace and make your own conclusions. In real life truth is somewhere between.

    in reply to: A glimpse into future US Fighter and Bomber design #2311043
    flateric
    Participant

    NG bomber is quite old QSP-studies-based manned/unmanned LRS concept from early 2007

    http://s46.radikal.ru/i114/1109/e4/366fc6f29512t.jpg

    (c) Northrop Grumman via Graham Warwick

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2311048
    flateric
    Participant

    i mean sukhoi and saturn can develop its ows desing of stealth nozzles 🙂

    are you ready to pay for these? tell me your credit card No. and CVC

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2311057
    flateric
    Participant

    this model presented at maks 2011 has bort number 56 .do u think 6 prototype will look like this model ?

    there will be some subtle differences

    i think some unstealthy features are done with purpuse

    which ones? this is just 1:10 scale display model made on CNC machine using original T-50 NX database to shorten production time (that’s why it was secured every night with canvas and sealed steel wires)

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2311067
    flateric
    Participant

    f-35 nozzle isnt that stealthy as flat nozzles of f-22,dr karl copp has clearly said this.

    Quite may be. What the price of this margin in terms of money and RCS reduction? Does he say that?

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2311090
    flateric
    Participant

    I did not claim to know anything technical about it. Especially regarding RCS.

    then, may be, you’d be more modest with statements? and go for less “??!!” and “!!!”

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2311108
    flateric
    Participant

    the only major problem that i see is the engine intake,which the fan can be seen with eyes,and second problen is engine nozzles !

    I see the major problem that you don’t care to read what others have said for thousand times already
    …and F-35 designers somehow feel comfortable with her nozzle, no?

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2311111
    flateric
    Participant

    And what do you know about the underbody, really? Tell me all about it.

    may be you will be first? proceed…

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2311114
    flateric
    Participant

    I feel more could be done in terms of stealth shaping, specifically the engines/nozzles and the underbody.

    Panzerkampfwagen VI was far more advanced in technology than T-34…but didn’t win the war.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2311244
    flateric
    Participant

    external changes to production version will be barely visible according to Segey Bogdan interview at MAKS. My 5 kopeks for radar blockers installation, implementing RAM – that’s all. enough is enough. once more, T-50 is not ‘YF-22ski’ and was created from the beginning as EMD series F/A-22s
    while Marchukov did tell of 2D nozzles, it’s a long way from talks to practice, and now I give less chance for them to appear on finalized version (Davidenko/Pogosyan patent of swiveling nozzles to hide IR radiation is another proof to my theory). I would be pleased to be proven wrong.
    And, of course, FGFA will have wings structure fitted for Mr.Pillai’s favorite child. Seems that’s why MKIs still can’t carry ’em)

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 6 #2311752
    flateric
    Participant

    Yes, it isn’t a S-duct, the necessary condition for S-duct is that straight line be blocked while it going through without additional device.

    I’m not sure if your definition of S-duct match that one used by aerodynamicists )

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2311966
    flateric
    Participant

    first and last Vega/Kulon Aist UAV flight in 2009
    designed by famous Vyacheslav Kondratyev, this UAV (intended for Iskander targeting), crashed because of FBW glitches, ending this highly controversial (and expensive) program

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2312624
    flateric
    Participant

    I’d guess the main reason why nothing has come of it is the lack of necessity

    main reason name was Mikhail Petrovich S.

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 692 total)