dark light

flateric

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 692 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2308848
    flateric
    Participant

    flights
    EDIT: shot is from 23th

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2308938
    flateric
    Participant

    hopefully until the end of 2011

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2308949
    flateric
    Participant

    An interesting point is how engines are tilted in relation with plane axis. I don’t know whether that can be the result of an aerodynamic question, but without any doubt it will favor stealth.

    it’s about aerodynamics

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2308952
    flateric
    Participant

    would Russia be interested in this for their MiG-29 replacements?]

    no

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2308972
    flateric
    Participant

    ( maybe some Saturn AL-31FM3 type ?), or is it a planned one ( izd.127 or 129 or 30 or whatever it’s called)

    M2/M3 are export-restricted

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2309640
    flateric
    Participant

    filed/not issued yet = no pics

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 6 #2310057
    flateric
    Participant

    We may as well say sukhoi built the flanker based on the idea of an f-15 with some aerodynamic refinements then

    It’s well known fact that Sukhoi studied alternative, ‘conventional’ T-10 configuration, T-10-2, that looked much like F-15 and soon make it way to dustbin. I’d say they were more admire to F-14…

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 6 #2310173
    flateric
    Participant

    what do you think of this?

    that author is sloppy idiot?

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2310423
    flateric
    Participant

    Any more news or esp. photos of this version ?? All I remember is a tiny detail of a fuselage in the background with some “strange” cheeks attached.
    Deino

    One can wonder how that photo has leaked…these birds don’t like publicity, especially here.
    Alex Koval found this piece of puzzle meantime
    http://www.linkos-tcp.ru/OurProduct/ОЭСВР-«Фракция».aspx
    (as you know, Tu-214R R&DTE works are dubbed ‘Fraction-4’)

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2310731
    flateric
    Participant

    It’s still a guess.

    It’s still a wish I’d say.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2310797
    flateric
    Participant

    You did notice the “what if” – not “is”?

    do you want to discuss technology of growing mushrooms in mouth?

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2310803
    flateric
    Participant

    I mean the extra cone shaped addition on the T-50 (51) tail cone

    you will wonder, but I’m talking about the same ‘extra cone’
    new sting added instead of T50-1 tailcone has anti-spin chute inside
    after high AoA and stall tests it will be removed

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2310886
    flateric
    Participant

    But why did they need a new housing or say why the protrusion?

    you are designer. where you are going to put damn anti-spin chute on T-50?

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2310892
    flateric
    Participant

    What if the perfectly flat underside of the F-22 is just a big barn-door reflector of radio energy?

    remember, you promised to not enter areas you are not specialized in
    keep that rule

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2310996
    flateric
    Participant

    2002
    If only they’d have money for that. Preferable as much as PW spent for F119/F135))

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 692 total)