dark light

flateric

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 692 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2382388
    flateric
    Participant

    what the connection do you see between FADEC sensor failure on T50-2 and T50-1 non-flying?

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2382558
    flateric
    Participant

    It may yet be three

    no

    I think it will be fly in the near future. In this month.

    I know that not

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2383464
    flateric
    Participant

    Sukhoi has played enough with sidestick on Su-37. pilots didn’t like it
    and always a harsh argument comes that ‘pilot wounded in right hand can always switch to left one’

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2383869
    flateric
    Participant

    Can you post a summary of it Flateric ?

    sorry, do not have to translate this blah-blah
    main educt dealing with Stage Two engine you can read in my previous post

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2383875
    flateric
    Participant

    it was a flat nozzle for S-32, its carrier-based predecessor
    (factory model photos attached)

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2384035
    flateric
    Participant

    http://vpk-news.ru/articles/8228
    The engine of the second phase has been made already!

    oh, that Google Translator…

    do you feel the difference between ‘has been made already’ and common phrases used by Marchukov in original text – ‘engine is laid down’ (don’t take it literally like ‘ship is laid down’) and ‘engine is being made’?

    you expect Saturn to put F119ski like rabbit from a hat right at once?

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2384704
    flateric
    Participant

    as i said we must wait t-50-3

    you will see nothing radically new there

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2303249
    flateric
    Participant

    can someone tell me if all these sensors will be reshape for stealth ??

    no.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2303251
    flateric
    Participant

    Is it part of President-S?

    yes

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2303573
    flateric
    Participant

    On photos of the unpainted prototypes aren’t there 3 KS-U-shaped openings just in behind the radome?…

    Logically, yes, Ken. But damn doesn’t fit shape exactly as you see.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2303867
    flateric
    Participant

    it’s from the other fairy tale – L370 has nothing to do with PAK FA

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2307801
    flateric
    Participant

    FLATERIC do u think t-50-3 will fly before end of the year,so no delays? And do u think it will be shaped more for stealth ?

    yes/no

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2308058
    flateric
    Participant

    Flight of the third prototype is planning for early 2012…

    source? if this was February Take-Off interview with Beliy, the mistake was explained already – interview for Russian edition of Take-Off was taken on October, 2010, but went to February, 2011 English version unedited. Hence in phrase ‘we will install AESA on T50-3 early next year’ year should be read not as 2012, but as 2011

    so, again, should fly till the end of this year

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2308096
    flateric
    Participant

    Maybe next year, NIIP officials seems more reliable to me…

    and what did they say?

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2308843
    flateric
    Participant

    It clearly has an aerodynamic function, but RCS implications?

    It clearly has not) It’s related to door opening kinematics.

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 692 total)