what the connection do you see between FADEC sensor failure on T50-2 and T50-1 non-flying?
It may yet be three
no
I think it will be fly in the near future. In this month.
I know that not
Sukhoi has played enough with sidestick on Su-37. pilots didn’t like it
and always a harsh argument comes that ‘pilot wounded in right hand can always switch to left one’
Can you post a summary of it Flateric ?
sorry, do not have to translate this blah-blah
main educt dealing with Stage Two engine you can read in my previous post
it was a flat nozzle for S-32, its carrier-based predecessor
(factory model photos attached)
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/8228
The engine of the second phase has been made already!
oh, that Google Translator…
do you feel the difference between ‘has been made already’ and common phrases used by Marchukov in original text – ‘engine is laid down’ (don’t take it literally like ‘ship is laid down’) and ‘engine is being made’?
you expect Saturn to put F119ski like rabbit from a hat right at once?
as i said we must wait t-50-3
you will see nothing radically new there
can someone tell me if all these sensors will be reshape for stealth ??
no.
Is it part of President-S?
yes
On photos of the unpainted prototypes aren’t there 3 KS-U-shaped openings just in behind the radome?…
Logically, yes, Ken. But damn doesn’t fit shape exactly as you see.
it’s from the other fairy tale – L370 has nothing to do with PAK FA
FLATERIC do u think t-50-3 will fly before end of the year,so no delays? And do u think it will be shaped more for stealth ?
yes/no
Flight of the third prototype is planning for early 2012…
source? if this was February Take-Off interview with Beliy, the mistake was explained already – interview for Russian edition of Take-Off was taken on October, 2010, but went to February, 2011 English version unedited. Hence in phrase ‘we will install AESA on T50-3 early next year’ year should be read not as 2012, but as 2011
so, again, should fly till the end of this year
Maybe next year, NIIP officials seems more reliable to me…
and what did they say?
It clearly has an aerodynamic function, but RCS implications?
It clearly has not) It’s related to door opening kinematics.