Page 40 – Key Publishing

flateric

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 692 total)

← 1 2 3 … 39 40 41 … 45 46 47 →

Author

Posts
February 28, 2011 at 10:07 pm in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2333384

flateric
Participant

mounted internal of the intake?

yes

February 28, 2011 at 9:53 pm in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2333396

flateric
Participant

what is that thing you attached?

It’s one of KRR (radar blocker) variants studied at 2nd MoD Institute (LO research think tank).

February 28, 2011 at 9:49 pm in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2333398

flateric
Participant

Now weather is a factor. Watch forecast for UHKD

February 28, 2011 at 9:26 am in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2333775

flateric
Participant

I would like to stick my head inside those air duct on the ’52’:)

you won’t find there anything new comparing to “50-1”
S-duct a-la F-22 will never appear on T-50
but starting from “50-3” they would cut your head right there;)
apart of blocker, T-50 inlet is a piece of art – for those who understands

a little teaser while we are waiting for 50-2 maiden flight…

February 25, 2011 at 10:59 pm in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 4 #2335224

flateric
Participant

The link was already provided earlier.
http://www.electronicaviation.com/news/Military/962

just note that link to original source (an Indian news site) is leading to nowhere and there are no such news can be found via googling whole http://www.newkerala.com

February 24, 2011 at 10:19 am in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2336865

flateric
Participant

…this weekend or start of next week

February 21, 2011 at 11:23 pm in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 4 #2338406

flateric
Participant

Why would it be strange?

my reasons
– IL-76 is just too unnecessary big for that purpose
– modyfying IL-76 forward fuselage nose with all that transparencies for radar tests seems too much effort for task that Y-8 or 737 can easily carry on with plenty space at the nose and energy onboard (and they could much easier be modified for that)

February 21, 2011 at 10:38 pm in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 4 #2338432

flateric
Participant

I think they are modding another Il-76 for J-20’s nose.

err…isn’t it too strange choice – IL-76 as AESA testbed? I wonder how funny it will look like

February 21, 2011 at 7:23 am in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 4 #2339062

flateric
Participant

60 KW can hardly feed a powerful AESA with 2000 T/R modules.

AL-31FN Series 4 (Article 39) that reportedly is under development for CAC by Salyut as a ‘temporaly decision’ for J-20 till WS-15 will come in has enough power.

February 17, 2011 at 8:47 pm in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 4 #2341511

flateric
Participant

Holydays are over …..:D 😮

Andreas, on SDF they saythat pics “taken in January but recently released”

February 16, 2011 at 2:26 pm in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 4 #2342650

flateric
Participant

The engine cannot be a regular AL-31FN which cannot support such high dry thrust.’

what exactly ‘such’? we just didn’t know exact take-off weight of J-20 in this flight

If you claim China managed to get a regular AL-31FN and special treated it and managed to upthrust it. Then it will not be a AL-31FN anymore.

agreed, it’s quite a possibility

A WS-10B sounds more reasonable.

why then this ‘WS-10B’ nozzle looks so much AL-31ish?

February 16, 2011 at 7:31 am in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2343002

flateric
Participant

Your thoughts?

may be several sections like this, each installed with incremental angle to vertical, composing a trap for returning waves? dunno
blocker will be initially tested at Saturn stand, then, if needed, additional modifications will be implemented in 117 compressor
such a blocker design will *not* be implemented only to T-50
we need to wait for 50-3 to see (if they will allow us)

February 15, 2011 at 9:16 pm in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2343400

flateric
Participant

I slightly remember a logo very close to one on render that was pushed ca. 1997-1998…:p

The following is a non-exclusive list of registered trademarks, registered service marks, or trademarks or service marks of Lockheed Martin Corporation or its subsidiaries, in the United States and/or other countries or jurisdictions:

<…>FIGHTER ENTERPRISE (& DESIGN)<…>

http://www.lockheedmartin.com/disclaimer.html

February 15, 2011 at 7:11 am in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2344226

flateric
Participant

but they still need some curvature.

need what for? damn, X-32/F-32 need not

http://www.jsf.mil/images/gallery/cdp/boeing/misc/cdp_boe_misc_014.jpg

Mod Edit: The third image was far too large for this forum. The link will have to do instead.

February 14, 2011 at 9:27 am in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2345373

flateric
Participant

do u have a picture of this compressor? some one said they had the picture before.

just part is shown – blocker lenght rougly equals its diameter and not a mirror copy of this section
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 692 total)

← 1 2 3 … 39 40 41 … 45 46 47 →