Key Publishing

Haleyoneshoemak

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 421 total)

1 2 3 … 27 28 29 →

Author

Posts
April 23, 2004 at 5:38 pm in reply to: Missile Thread #2696481

Haleyoneshoemak
Participant

Well… Why not!!! This after all is quite a wagon train…

.

Credit: Kanwa Intel.
Subject: Russian Chinese head to head.
Market: Kuala Lumpur.

(Russian BUK-MI2 medium range SAM left Chinese KS1A right)

More on Missiles:

What type are ones shown in these pics???
http://upload.top81.net/isapi/dszhpic/11295122_72108.jpg
http://bbs.china.com/images/2004-04-23/10826952165d.jpg

And the implications of object in the background???
http://bbs.china.com/images/2004-04-23/1082687518200442221341670355.jpg
CCTV Logo YES! But, does it have any associations
with or ties to Chinese technology? Or is this merely some CCTV
coverage of some foreign military hardwares & items???

April 22, 2004 at 9:31 pm in reply to: Anti-NEO (asteroid) weapons #2696654

Haleyoneshoemak
Participant

Re: Anti-NEO (asteroid) weapons

Originally posted by google
Seriously, this was in the latest issue of Flight International, where they discuss several possibilities;

1) Using a neutron bomb
2) Extremely high powered laser
3) Crashing another asteroid into the incident one
4) Attaching a spacecraft to the incident asteroid to ‘steer’ it out of the way.

Anyone else get a chance to read about it?

How’s about the most lethal solution — “Praying”????

April 22, 2004 at 4:24 pm in reply to: J-7s still in the make here??? #2696736

Haleyoneshoemak
Participant

More from the family of J-7s…

Dated 2004-04-22 09:18:34
http://mil.qianlong.com/4919/2004/04/22/228@2016404.htm
http://bbs.china.com/images/2004-04-19/108238597522074397100.jpg
Therefore emphasis placed on this series still very serious my opinion…

April 22, 2004 at 5:11 am in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2696805

Haleyoneshoemak
Participant

Originally posted by mavaustin
Dragon

I would disagree with your last assesment. China doesnt have to order it in large amount or in any amount. One can produce a piece of hardware that is aimed for export market and not for the domestic market.

based on the predictions, cost and benefit analysis, a company can come up with a product which can fulfill the needs of foreign market but i snot needed for local market. Consumer market in some cases can be the example.

FC-1 is a cheap solution with decent avionics suite based on how much the customer want sto spend. It slike a buying a car with extras if you wanna spend the money or you can buy the bare minimum without power windows and seats.

FC-1, LCA and T-50 fills that area. Noe everyone can get an F-16s, heck bangladesh couldn’t even get Block-10 F-16s. But FC-1 will be easily availbe to them with either Chinese or European avionics.

Honesty is gold. Bravo for
having the strength to say that things
could indeed be otherwise.

April 21, 2004 at 10:03 pm in reply to: What's wrong with the Ching-Kuo airplane? #2696839

Haleyoneshoemak
Participant

Originally posted by Hyperwarp

😀 😀 You know he never listens! But this
time he at least gave the (???FCK-1??? designation)
and not his J-6.9999++ designation :D:D.

(Hyperwarp to please ignore)

To Whom This may Concern:

Particular particular!!!

It’s almost as if someone says Pablems
is Pablem and that it must be Pablem and that it can never be
viewed or described as simply baby food :).

Shishh… That Fumanchu image??? It will always be there
no matter whether you have red stars painted on your forehead
or if it’s the image of the high noon sun!!! COMPRENDE????

Particular particular!!!

Here is another graphic of the family members

Incidentally, the F-16 & the F-2??? If and when compared
to the FCK-1???? Apples and oranges! Damn… I forgot that he didn’t
appreciated the term apples & oranges that much either.

You guys really think that the Americans are going to let
“the-other-Chinese-guy” make something better than that which they are pushing,
or that which could compete with them in the marketplace??

Be serious!!!!

April 21, 2004 at 5:13 pm in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2696892

Haleyoneshoemak
Participant

.

Into J-10s and stuff???

Good theme for your desktop wallpaper:

PS: Off topic and for the Chinese UFO enthusiats only:

http://bbs.china.com/military/html/board_57_post/507963/1981443.html

UFO over Hunan: Foreign intruders?
Mistaken identity? Classfied Chinese projects at the works, i.e., Area 51 stuff?? Or,
indeed of mysterious circumstances???

April 21, 2004 at 4:29 pm in reply to: What's wrong with the Ching-Kuo airplane? #2696898

Haleyoneshoemak
Participant

Originally posted by crobato

It’s as silly as the J-10 anime drawing, but deserves a place in my image collection no less, partly because of the excellent pan form drawing of the Ching Kuo. You can see here that while the body seems inspired from the F-16 and the F-17, the wings itself are not but are inspired from two other fighters that served with the ROCAF—the F-104 Starfighter and the F-5E Tiger.

This is a nice fighter. I was thinking that Taiwan should not have bought those F-16s and Mirages but rather bought an equal number of F-CK-1s, and for the extra change, bought even more.

The jet deserves a GE F404 engine rather than the two bizplane engines it got, which is said to take a while to spool.

Actually, one of the FCK-1 designs the Taiwanese came
up with at the time was so futuristic and advance-looking that it put
MiG, Sukhoi, even Mitsubishi to shame if it was realized.

I guess the parts supplier of the FCK-1 didn’t like very much the
ambitions these islanders was trying to express with that super design and a plug
to stop or to limit the technology transfer was somehow inserted.

My view on the FCK-1 however: Although the FCK-1 is indeed a cool
looking plane, I doubt however that it’s any superior to that of the F-5 Freedom Fighter
and/or of Japan’s F-1 because of the technology transfers imposed.

April 21, 2004 at 6:20 am in reply to: What's wrong with the Ching-Kuo airplane? #2696960

Haleyoneshoemak
Participant

Originally posted by pietje

I can also imagine political pressure from china. 🙂

Anybody ever consider the provisions, clauses, restrictions,
which may lie hidden in the contracts and/or agreements made on the acquisition of
the engine and other technologies which make up this plane?

April 21, 2004 at 4:50 am in reply to: China is a fledgling space power??? #2696966

Haleyoneshoemak
Participant

Originally posted by PRC4eva

far from fledgling, already superior to most western European nation, Japan, and only behind Russia and the US.

AFM is indeed an ideal medium into the inner thoughts
of the western mind and psyche, and/or the western audience.
Hopefully, it will help spread the good word and spearhead changes
in the attitudes that the west has in all things eastern.

Numero Tre’??? It’s no small potato!!! “Credit must go where credit is due…”

April 20, 2004 at 7:52 pm in reply to: Wow! What a load!!! No wonder it's the fighter bomber choice of the east… #2697030

Haleyoneshoemak
Participant

What can I say. Seems as
if they don’t even bother keeping it behind
closed doors anymore…

April 20, 2004 at 7:25 pm in reply to: China is a fledgling space power??? #2697035

Haleyoneshoemak
Participant

Originally posted by F-18 Hamburger

I’d rather see the Chinese go to Venus.. everyone wants to go to Mars.. no one wants to go to Venus, there’s a similar chance of finding life on the upper atmosphere on Venus as there is the possibility of life frozen under Mars.. plus it’s a shorter distance too!

Burger,

I think you’d have much better luck at driving a wedge
between me and some of my other Canucktriotes 🙂 here than
you would trying to reach the hometown of Marco Polo.

Once again, nice try….

Fair warning:

Notorious for popups!
http://bbs13.xilu.com/cgi-bin/bbs/view?forum=zgyb&message=47924
Click at own peril!!!

April 20, 2004 at 5:36 pm in reply to: China is a fledgling space power??? #2697057

Haleyoneshoemak
Participant

Originally posted by Phil Foster
I think we need as many countries going for space as we can possibly get, Britains involvement in ESA is pathetic the best chance we have is that bloke going for the X Prize with Star Chaser. I just wish the government would give him a hand but they won’t.

I don’t care who colonises the stars first, or who lands on Mars first and if its the Chinese then good luck to them and very well done. It should give everybody else a damn good kick up the backside but I doubt the bloody British government will lift a finger to help. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr! Does me head in so it does.

Phil

🙂

Dedicated to the western world:

While I don’t wish to sound any alarms here, the grievances that
I have put forward here, however, serves as an opportunity for me to draw
attention to the negativities the west always seems to have on the importance that
Chinese contributions have in the fueling of progress in this world.

“And space clearly is yet
another such fine example of biased sentiments directed
unnecessary at the Chinese.”

Fledgling; as per Tharsaurus.com:
http://thesaurus.reference.com/search?q=Fledgling
My opinion: Darn right intentional put-down!

“I mean why try to portray this as a no-values/no mean feats event
when clearly, this Chinese push into the cosmos “practically forced into submission”
the revival of the world’s once stagnant manned lunar program again”???

Truth: What will they say, how will they react, or how
will they ever be able to “swallow their pride” if and when other developing
nations of this world, ultimately, will join in on the game???

Bottom line: “Credit must and should
go where credit is due” and credit is definitely due and deserving of
the Chinese in this area of expertist.

“Why down-play this important Chinese contribution????”

April 20, 2004 at 4:30 am in reply to: Man… No wonder nations are seeking bunker buster mini nukes…. #2697149

Haleyoneshoemak
Participant

Well…

Glad I am not the only one who
is in the shock and awes about the world’s objectivities
on the needs of mini-nukes!!!

http://www.centurychina.com/plaboard/

Sorry to the CMF folks
for clicking this story here. I thought
the story was relevant.

At the very least, it’s not only
or just all about j-6s. There’s more to that than
meets the eye — much more…

April 19, 2004 at 9:10 pm in reply to: Aviation Art #2697233

Haleyoneshoemak
Participant

.

This has to be some
kind of a UFO they are still fiddling
with inside Area 51….

Israeli or American????

April 18, 2004 at 6:11 pm in reply to: Wow! What a load!!! No wonder it's the fighter bomber choice of the east… #2697402

Haleyoneshoemak
Participant

.

Seems there’s a size discrepancy
here in this pic. So which is which??? Or is
this somebody’s joke of the day???

Clearly, the fenced one
is distinguishable from the one that’s
have no wing fences in it.

Pics related to above:
http://pic.tiexue.net/origin/2004_4/2004_4_17_51458.jpg
http://pic.tiexue.net/origin/2004_4/2004_4_16_50932.jpg
Excuses please if this is a repeat.

Again, credit must go where credit is due…
http://pic.tiexue.net/origin/2004_4/2004_4_17_51963.jpg
Thank you Mr. Putin, from all of us!!!
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 421 total)

1 2 3 … 27 28 29 →