Originally posted by Hydropod
That is one hell of
a offensive way of insult… You
better remove thatAnd we wonder where all the Maestros have went.
Think they might be busy out looking for “members of this board who’re
trying to show the pride and excitement they have in the achievements of their country”
but didn’t have any idea that they were over doing it just a wee bit :)???Hmmm… Strange! Seems many had been banned for much less…
Originally posted by crobato
What about “Foxy” then?I read from the CDF, that the terms like “Jianghu”, “Jiangwei”, “Luhu” and “Luhai” used on the Chinese frigates and destroyers are actually made by the US.
Are you serious, Crob???
I mean, I thought those were Chinese names in alphabet.
My babblefish also tells me that those names are either Chinese
landmarks, i.e., USS Greenville and USS South Carolina, or personalities, i.e.,
The USS GW Bush, etc., etc., although I don’t know which.Given my Canadian identity however, I could be wrong.
Originally posted by Hyperwarp
“Fashionable”, “fabulous”, “Stylish” “Sexy”
Slick! And no arguments about it
pleeeeeease π :)!!!! Besides, the J-10 is a pretty
slick-looking machine, is it not???My hobby is helping new business come up with
distinctive and smashing names and this much I’m certain: Your
choices will definitely be a smash if applied to massage parlors and escort
agencies. It just won’t cut it for cool birds of prey.Cool name… Cool name indeed!!!
Originally posted by Darth Vader
Like the Fokker hehehe π
Darth,
You had your turn with the “Teja” and it was a brillant
choice. Now, it’s my turn so please don’t put a damper on this for me :)!!!
Damn… If only it was Canadian, I’d call it the Avro Arrow – II!!That’s it!!! Maybe the Canucks was the
culprit here and not the poor Israelis :)!!! Smokin gun!!! The
J-10 does resemble the Avro Arrow you know…By golly!!! No Lavi here that’s for sure.
It’s the Avro… it’s the Avro Arrow… those darn Chinese
must have stolen that Avro blue prints :)!!!
Originally posted by Evan
Ah, but neither FLASHLIGHT nor FIREBAR are still in active service with any air arm; thus FLASHBAR would be perfectly suitable.Slick-I!!! Flashy and sophisticated.
I’m ridding that NATO ‘F’ idiocy for once and for all times!!!
It is pretty slick, don’t you guys agree???
Originally posted by Evan
having said that, let me suggest
“FLASHBAR” as the code name for the J-10,
because it is a brilliant piece of work.A thought:
With that “F” still, are you insinuating that you still view the Chinese a danger and threat???
Hmmmm.. Don’t know what to say!!!
Originally posted by SOC
How are BLACKJACK, CHARGER, FINBACK, FISHBED, BEAR, COLT, CONDOR, etc biased? I’m totally lost as to your argument against the ASCC codenames.Should the Russians, too, start “branding” western goods and hardwares???
Originally posted by SOC
Once again this is
because those people were
NOT THREAT NATIONS.OC, are you implying that Russia (former USSR)
and present day China are threats to your country or to the world and
that your country (whichever it might be) is not???Now why is that???
Damn!!! All the while, I thought the Russians and the Chinese were the
only ones that harboured such silly notions, such unfounded fears, and such unneccessary
PHOBIAS!!! Once again, I guess I’ve learned something new again today!!!Canadian CF-101Bs
were not likely targets. Why is this
so hard to understand?And, what’s wrong with having NATO change its
geriatric ways and practices??? Are you saying that Russia and
China is still regarded as NΓΊmero enemigo uno???For life, for hope, for new ideas to take hold; the old, the unfair,
and, the unjust must go. I thought this bias practice by NATO needs to make room
for that which is more just to take root and a chance to grow…Example, and example only: If a name has
been assigned to India’s LCA, which we were informed is called the
“Teja”, then Teja it shall be and nothing else!!!I mean why “brand something” when there’s
no need to do so and when the item can be identified equally
as well if by its original and rightfull name anyhow???Although I accept these brandings,
personally however, I hate the names Farmer, Fishbed,
Foxbat, Fantan, Finback, etc., etc….Oh well, can’t win them all I guess!!!
Originally posted by SD-10
They should first
concentrate on Aviation before
going to Space.They have no choice in the matter….
They are now under heavy pressure to perform. They had great plans
and visions when their economy was the envy of the world. They had projects
such as getaways resorts in space by 2000 and it failed to materialize.They opened their mouth just a wee too
widely and now they are in for it. They now know that they
have no choice but to deliver as promised.A lesson “the whole world” should
learn and not be overly confident of themselves and their capabilities
until all of the eggs has been hatched.
Originally posted by F-18 Hamburger
Exactly, which is why the J-10 should be called J-10 French Fry as French Fries do not convey any meaning of hate.
You mean french fries are your favorite? I always
said that if you’re into Ronald McDonalds, then without a doubt, no
different are the rest of the world’s hamburgers :).
Originally posted by SOC
How are BLACKJACK, CHARGER, FINBACK, FISHBED, BEAR, COLT, CONDOR, etc biased? I’m totally lost as to your argument against the ASCC codenames.
Simple question, OC:
Does same apply to Japanese A/Cs, Indian A/Cs, Canadian A/C’s, South African A/C’s???
Simple answer: No!!!Catching on, OC???
Well… I didn’t think so. The thought was
simply too abstract.
Originally posted by SOC
Your names seem to be derogatory
for some reason, and I am still not understanding why
the naming practice is so offensive to youNames:
Hey! I’m sorry about that, OC. I didn’t know my idea could be so
confrontational, or offensive. My apologies for the use of Japan as reference here.
It was only as an example to show how inappropriate uses of or the assigning
of names can and does reflect on the gesture or biases behind it.Also. I never said it’s offensive.
Originally posted by F-18 Hamburger
the J-10 should be called the French Fry
π π π π
Well…. I don’t fancy fries much therefore your choice is
definitely not my pick of the “names” crop… Anyway, imagine every fighter from out of the
Japanese inventory runing in sequences of “N”, for example:– Kawasaki’s “N”itwit for the Zero
– Misubishi’s “N”asty-Tojo for the F-1, and
– Mitsubishi’s “N”ut-Cracker for the mighty F-2….I mean don’t you
guys think that the practice is
densely ludicrous???
Originally posted by Hyperwarp
how about FireWolf,
Flying-Dragon, Fearless, Fearsome,
Fabulous, Fiber-OpticWhy is it that the naming of Russian
and Chinese fighters by NATO have to start with
an “F” I’ll never know. Do you???BTW, does NATO also have a
similar naming policy for A/Cs from South Korea,
Japan, East Indian, etc., etc.???Oh Yes… the above names gives off this
impression of evil while the name “Slick” depicts pleasing
appearances and an air of none hostility.And it is a slick chick if you don’t mind my saying so.
Originally posted by SabreAce
Tigershark is an indonesian poster from CMF, I believe. π
Actually, Ace…
If he’s the same Tigershark as in CMF, then he’s from my neck of the
woods meaning he’s definitely no Indonesian. Therefore, I’d say something has to be
terribly wrong with your crystalball because it’s sending out very very missleading informations.
In other words: There’s nothing wrong with Babblefish — it’s you, Sabre! πA thought: Could it maybe also be due to that
heavy/course UK accent that you’re accustomed which have gotten you so confused as
to what real Canuck English might trully sound :)???Suggestion: Your Babblefish probably
have worms in it, Sabre. Get rid of it ASAP before
it starts to infect your brain as well :)…