I don’t know whatever became of the model but I assume it was finished to the same high standard as the airliner models that he and his colleagues produce. I can only admire such skills. I’ve certainly never described myself as a modeller – I’m an assembler of kits!
Or go completely crazy and just build your model from scratch. I recall a guy who works for one of the well-known airliner display model companies, sitting-down and announcing that he was going to build a 24th scale Draken. Armed only with a block of wood, away he went. Don’t you just hate people with a skill?!
Blimey, I’ve never seen the softback edition before. It’s a shame they didn’t release it on DVD although I guess that by modern standards it would be a bit naff production-wise, but still very nostalgic. I must get my VHS tapes put onto disk!
Remember the Test Pilot series too? It was very similar in terms of production and the featured aircraft were even more delightful… ahh that magnificent Lightning…
I haven’t ventured-out in the snow drifts to find the second issue of Airfix Magazine yet, but judging by the break-down of contents listed at the top of this forum page, I can’t imagine I’d want to buy it anyway. There’s only the Jaguar bit that would interest me and I doubt if it will tell me anything I don’t already know.
It raises a question which has worried me all along about this project – if the content has to include a substantial amount of non-aviation subjects, and then the remaining aviation stuff happens to cover subjects you don’t even care about, then you ain’t gonna be buying it? As I said once before, we pursued the idea of re-starting Airfix Magazine a couple of years back but we pulled-out when Hornby insisted that the content couldn’t be all-aviation. I’m still thinking that this thorny issue might well prove to be the magazine’s downfall. Look what happened to Scale Models…
Okay, a good magazine will (or might) survive on its merits, but these days when a magazine costs more than a few bob, and the internet is overflowing with competing material, I can’t see many people buying a magazine unless a substantial amount of the content is of direct interest. Suppose we just have to wait and see what happens?
I could nearly hear it when reading the book.
I was just a tad confused by the mention of a paperback as I thought the BBC book was only published in hardback. Another book called “RAF Fighter Pilot” was published in both hard and soft back editions (which I wrote) and heaven-knows how many people thought it was a spin-off from the series. It wasn’t, it was just a poor choice of similar title!
Didn’t know there was a paperback? I remember the hardback book. I still have the series on VHS tapes somewhere in the loft. Ahh, JPs, BBC Radiophonic Workshop music… all seems so old now!
Strange how that book has disappeared. As I mentioned in my own book, Phoenix or Folly‘s text has mistakes but it was easily the best book on the subject. But it’s extremely rare to see a copy anywhere these days.
Nope, I’ve never seen any spectacular low-level images. Some were taken but they don’t show the surrounding terrain, sadly. I picked the most attractive shots I could for my book but as you can see in that or pretty-much any book or magazine feature on the type, there’s only a fairly limited range of in-flight images to choose from unfortunately.
none of the satisfaction at all in building your own
That’s not the reason why I prefer plastic kits though. For me it’s simply a question of accuracy and detail. I’ve always said that I derive no particular pleasure from building models, it is merely a means to an end. If I could buy the models finished to the standard that I want, then I would!
Guess whatever you like old chap.
Corgi 1/144th Valiant
Diecasts are nice but they don’t thrill me all that much as they never match the accuracy of (most) plastic kits. If they did, I would have stopped buying plastic a long time ago! The 144th scale models are particularly uninspiring as they’re basically solid lumps with no detail at all. Then again, some of the models are surprisingly good – look at that Jet Provost that appeared recently…
the quality of the Sea Vixen mouldings is easily on a par with the Lightnings
Must have improved significantly then. I’ll reserve judgement until I see a boxed production kit!:p
anyone know if Corgi are going to produce a die cast model of one?
Not heard of any plans. I would think it unlikely, given that even the Buccaneer seems to have been a struggle to get into production, and I can’t imagine a Sea Vixen would be as popular. Would be nice though I agree. Personally, I’m waiting to see what Dragon’s plastic 72nd scale Sea Vixen will be like. If it’s as good as their Meteor I’ll definitely be impressed!
I’m praying that the coming Sea Vixen and Valiant will be a return to the Lightnings form!
Alas, they don’t quite come up to that standard – I think it fair to say that the Lightnings (and the Sea/Spitfire) were a brief but wonderful interlude in Airfix’s history! As one well-known spokesman for Hornby often says these days, nobody is seriously attempting to replicate the quality of those kits – but I doubt if anybody will complain if the standard of their new products continues to be maintained or even improved. They ain’t bad, and more to the point, they’re covering subjects that we’ve wanted for a long, long time.
I’m sorry but even I’m almost lost for words with that turn around!
Not quite sure what you’re getting-at. I’m not criticising the museum, I’m questioning the sanity of the MoD for sanctioning the museum’s presence in the first place, if they are then going to treat it almost as an inconvenience a few years later. If it was a good idea when it was created, then presumably it still is, therefore the only issue is money. If that is the case, then surely someone with a bit of clout should be able to illustrate that the MoD is simply being entirely unreasonable?
You have to wonder what the thinking was behind setting-up a museum there in the first place if there was always the possibility that they’d be thrown-out at some stage in the future.
I can appreciate that security might be an issue but it’s not that big a deal these days. A properly-secured museum complex in the current location, presents no more risk to QinetiQ’s activities than the photographers and plane spotters stood at the other end of the airfield. Besides, this saga doesn’t seem to be about security – it’s about money. All well and good if the site could be used for something else but we all know that it will not be. It’s just another sad, shabby tale of the MoD recognising the cost of everything but the value of nothing.
since when does the MoD consult the public on what they do with policy, aircraft, and land
Er… well yes, exactly!
Regardless of who “owns” the aircraft now, they were (or still are) the property of Her Maj’s Government, on Her Maj’s property. With typical British resignation, this saga is presented as a sad inevitability. If, dare I say, this was happening in the US, then voices would be saying “hang on, these are (or were) our aircraft on Government (ie “our”) land, therefore we ought to have a right to say that we’d like to keep them there as part of our country’s heritage, given that there’s no logical reason why they can’t be there. It might be easy to wrap everything in red tape or issues of defence and security but we all know that we’re actually talking about an abandoned HAS on an area of redundant land, which wouldn’t be making so much as a penny for the taxpayer if it was vacated.
In a sane society, someone could step-in and instruct the MoD to stop being so petty and ridiculous, and leave the museum alone, or perhaps encourage it to expand. But nobody is going to do that unless there’s pressure to do it. We’re powerless to provide that pressure but surely the media isn’t, particularly when respected preservation bodies and magazines such as Flypast could make quite a fuss. But I guess nobody will. Maybe the aircraft will survive and move elsewhere. Maybe they will not. Maybe somebody will point-out just how pointless (or counter-productive) the MoD’s actions have been? I doubt it though!