dark light

Chox

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 935 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Boscombe Down Aviation Collection Troubles #1143740
    Chox
    Participant

    The saga is just ridiculous. Taxpayer’s aircraft on taxpayer’s land and yet the taxpayer isn’t even consulted. An area of a huge airfield which will never be used for anything, and yet the collection isn’t expanded, it’s thrown out. Madness.

    Is Flypast going to make a stink about this? Or will the story just be reported with a shrug and forgotten about as usual? Get the media interested, illustrate what nonsense this is!

    in reply to: Boscombe Down Aviation Collection Troubles #1144127
    Chox
    Participant

    Absolute disgrace. This isn’t about protecting taxypayer’s money, it’s about the bean-counters finding another way to make a few bob in order to justify their jobs. Shame on everyone concerned. For heaven’s sake, an airfield the size of Boscombe Down and most of it completely unused.

    Think this ought to be cause for a campaign if ever there was one?

    in reply to: RAF Macaws Team Members #1151864
    Chox
    Participant

    Brilliant photos! This has become my favourite forum thread!

    in reply to: TSR.2 Memories project #1155877
    Chox
    Participant

    Suppose it’s a question of what one describes as “completed”…

    XR219 was obviously completed to flight standard and XR220 was finally ready for flight on the day that the project was officially cancelled. XR221 was also complete but used for ground-running of systems so technically-speaking it wasn’t yet completed to flight standard. Beyond that it’s less clear. Images of XR222 at Cranfield show the aircraft as more of a semi-complete shell and it is known that some parts were taken from other airframes (didn’t even have a serial applied), so it seems fair to assume that it was assembled specifically for Cranfield from existing components. So I guess one could say that the only “complete” airframes were XR219, XR220 and XR221.

    in reply to: TSR.2 Memories project #1156036
    Chox
    Participant

    As far as I can determine, neither aircraft was completed. XR222 seems to have been little more than a shell with parts from various airframes which suggests that it was assembled to its final state after cancellation, for Cranfield.

    in reply to: RAF Macaws Team Members #1157822
    Chox
    Participant

    Probably is – he was on the team for some time.

    Magnificent photos – what a treat! Thanks for posting them for us!

    in reply to: RAF Macaws Team Members #1158663
    Chox
    Participant

    Can we see the photos? The magnificent Macaws…

    in reply to: Post Your Harrier Pictures #1158760
    Chox
    Participant

    As the previous post says – any more? Surely?? :p

    in reply to: TSR2 photos #1158762
    Chox
    Participant

    I haven’t seen Damien’s book but the extracts I’ve seen do look good and it sounds like it’s a pretty exhaustive exploration of the subject. My book is directed more at the story of the programme and the politics surrounding it rather than the actual aircraft, so I would think that between the two books the subject ought to be pretty-well covered now! After fifty years I think we can say that TSR2 has finally been given the proper attention that it has deserved, although I’m sure that these two new books will inevitably lead to yet more information and stories emerging in due course. It’s certainly illustrated that even after all this time, TSR2 is still an incredibly popular subject!

    in reply to: Harrier Stuff! #1158765
    Chox
    Participant

    Hunter, I would of course be very interested to know more about the incident – and the photo… do tell!

    Bump/Page I don’t think there’s much chance of this new book being a proverbial “Bible” but I will strive to make it as interesting as possible. Unfortunately, much depends on commercial considerations and the aim is for a product which has a broad appeal. Inevitably, a “Bible” is a much bigger, expensive and less-imaginative product which therefore has far less appeal. Obviously it’s the sort of book that you and I would love, but commercially it’s a but of a non-starter. I guess something like this might appear one day but if it does it will inevitably come from one of the small specialist publishers that can afford to produce a short run of expensive books. Still, having said that, I will try and make my new book as informative and interesting as I can. You can never keep everybody happy though!

    in reply to: Harrier Stuff! #1089062
    Chox
    Participant

    Probably, but “handbaggings” generally make the person who issues them look silly, and as they say, any publicity is good publicity I guess (not that it benefits me – just my publisher!).

    Will the book have a chapter similiar to this forums ‘Harriers in museums’ thread, on preserved examples of the type

    Not too sure yet. It’s difficult to make a judgement as to what to include. I want to run a basic serials list for all Harriers but there isn’t enough space to include complete histories for every aircraft, so it will doubtless disappoint some readers who want every detail for every aircraft. On the other hand, different readers will complain if too much space is devoted to lists like that so you can’t win. Preserved airframes is an idea that appeals to me but the problem is that it would only be accurate for a few months I guess… It is a headache deciding what to do, actually! No decision yet to be honest!

    in reply to: Daily Mail Trans-Atlantic Air Race May 1969 #1090141
    Chox
    Participant

    ahh nostalgia…:p

    in reply to: Harriers in museums #1090198
    Chox
    Participant

    Any updates to this list recently?

    in reply to: Daily Mail Trans-Atlantic Air Race May 1969 #1090207
    Chox
    Participant

    Lovely photos there – that’s the first time I’ve seen a shot of the NY end. You’d think there would be more images of the event but it seems to have faded into history now… like so many great adventures of the past. I suppose the very idea of landing a Harrier in a coal yard would be too terrifying for our Health & Safety society now, even if we had any Harriers with which to try it!

    in reply to: RAF tail flash #1090240
    Chox
    Participant

    No idea, but I do know that the RAF’s last single-seat Hunter had the starboard fin flash applied the wrong way round with the blue at the front! :p

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 935 total)