dark light

Chox

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 935 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Looking for TSR.2 topside photos #1128917
    Chox
    Participant

    Can you tell us more about the book that these drawings are going to be in? I’m not quite sure why you’d want to portray the aircraft with countermeasures pods when the aircraft is still painted overall white? Are you planning to add camouflage later? Is it going to be a look at how the aircraft might have appeared?

    in reply to: Nimrod retirement today – please add pictures #1129440
    Chox
    Participant

    7 Sqn did put up a three ship display on some years, maybe this proceeded the Nimrod display?

    Nope, it was a four-ship. I know the three-ship display you’re thinking of though – that was separate to the Nimrod display though. Oh well, it matters not, just would have been nice to have seen a photo!

    I also fondly remember shiny new XZ285 which later went off to Finningley to take part in the 1977 Jubilee Review and subsequently retained it’s 42 Squadron badge on the fin fillet for some time. Looked very smart chugging round the circuit at St.Mawgan. Then the next thing we knew, it had gone for conversion to AEW standard and of course that was ultimately the end of it. What a waste of virtually new aeroplane.

    in reply to: Freddie Page anyone? #1129447
    Chox
    Participant

    Yes wiesso that’s the chap.

    Thanks for the pointer chumpy – I’ll take a look at that.

    Strange isn’t it, that there doesn’t seem to be so much as one decent photo around?

    in reply to: Nimrod retirement today – please add pictures #1129854
    Chox
    Participant

    Wow that’s a brilliant photo – sheer nostalgia!

    The Canberra/Nimrod formations were (as far as I can recall) in the 1976-1980 sort of era and it seemed to be a pretty standard arrangement for each show back then. Four Canberras in box formation, the rear aircraft trailing a Rushton with the flare lit, and a Nimrod bringing-up the rear, breaking left straight into a solo display.

    That photo you’ve posted is great but it’s also pretty depressing. All three magnificent machines are gone now!

    in reply to: Nimrod retirement today – please add pictures #1130163
    Chox
    Participant

    It’s a damned shame that they couldn’t have hung-on a couple more months, and they could have flown four Nimrods up the Mall for Her Maj’s birthday. That would have been a very fitting end for a magnificent aeroplane. But then we all know that the powers-that-be wouldn’t want to have too much attention drawn to the type’s shamelessly premature withdrawal!

    in reply to: Nimrod retirement today – please add pictures #1130472
    Chox
    Participant

    I know it’s a long shot, but did anybody ever get a photo of the display (or rehearsal) that St.Mawgan did for some years for their air show, with four Canberras leading a Nimrod? It was such a great sight as they swept-in from the coast, I’d dearly love to see a photo!

    in reply to: Nimrod retirement today – please add pictures #1131335
    Chox
    Participant

    Good Lord, the shot with the St.Austell “mountains” in the background is enough to get me reaching for a box of tissues *sniff*. Wish I’d been there to see that. What a nice – but terribly sad – picture.

    in reply to: Nimrod retirement today – please add pictures #1136134
    Chox
    Participant

    Thanks for posting the photo of the “Chocolate Bomber” Scorpion – after all these years, I finally see a photograph of it!

    I’ve heard lots of stories about the repaint saga, but I suspect the truth of the matter was probably quite mundane, and that it was simply the first trial scheme which looked entirely unsuitable once it was applied. Very interesting though nonetheless.

    in reply to: 27 Squadron Vulcan Tail art #1137216
    Chox
    Participant

    Yes. That’s all correct. 🙂

    in reply to: 1/72 Airfix Vulcan IFR Probe #223210
    Chox
    Participant

    As Peter says, make your own. The Airfix probe is rubbish in any case. Better to make a new one from sprue or plastic rod, and attach a nozzle from another (better) kit’s refuelling probe.

    in reply to: 27 Squadron Vulcan Tail art #1137482
    Chox
    Participant

    Indeed, XH558 and XH560 both went to 50 Squadron and flew with the tanker and sample pod fit for some time. The 27 Sqn markings were removed pretty swiftly and they were devoid of unit markings for some time until 50 Squadron applied theirs. The shot of XL445 shows how it looked after 50 squadron applied full markings to it and also shows (on the tail cone) how the green went a strange brown-ish colour.

    The one at Solway does illustrate how odd fresh Medium Sea Grey looks, especially when compared to grey that’s been applied for years. It looks particularly strange when it’s next to national insignia that hasn’t been repainted!

    in reply to: 27 Squadron Vulcan Tail art #1137656
    Chox
    Participant

    Matching Medium Sea Grey for a Vulcan is a chore. Even though MSG was the standard camouflage colour (not for wrap-round camouflage though, as that was Dark Grey), it quickly changed shade one it was applied and became much paler. The Green also faded but not as much as the MSG. The Green tended to go a brown-ish colour, oddly enough.

    However, the MSG on 27 Squadron Vulcans didn’t fade all that much as, unlike their bomber counterparts, the MRR aircraft were given a gloss finish which protected the paint and kept the colours fairly strong. The NAM Vulcan is indeed painted in the correct colours. It just looks slightly odd at first glance because the paint hasn’t been applied for too long, so it hasn’t faded to the tones that you generally saw on operational Vulcans. It should be a pretty good match for a 27 Sqn MRR machine though!

    As for the City of Lincoln coat of arms, I’m not sure why this would be on a 27 Squadron aircraft as they were based at Scampton, whereas the Lincoln coat of arms was applied to Waddington Wing aircraft. Again, maybe a photo might clarify what you’re referring to?

    in reply to: 27 Squadron Vulcan Tail art #1138100
    Chox
    Participant

    Yup, that particular marking was almost a one-off as the caption confirms. As far as I can recall, 27 Squadron’s standard markings comprised a dark green elephant on a white circle when they re-formed in the MRR role at Scampton – the Dumbo marking came along later. I’ve got a photo of XH558 somewhere with the early standard elephant marking on the tail.

    Ahh Madjock, you’ve reminded me of 617’s most attractive markings! They looked really impressive in camouflage with the dayglow lightning bolts on the tail.

    in reply to: 27 Squadron Vulcan Tail art #1138512
    Chox
    Participant

    The Dumbo design wasn’t introduced until after the squadron had re-equipped for the maritime radar reconnaissance role. It was designed with approval from Disney, and only appeared after the unit had started MRR ops at Scampton. I can’t recall ever having seen a dayglow Dumbo design on any aircraft but if such a photo exists, I’d be inclined to think it was an unofficial “one off” – I’d be interested to see it though.

    in reply to: Waddington 2010 – F-111 Rumour? #1140167
    Chox
    Participant

    Indeed, it was scrubbed a while back following the Singapore saga.

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 935 total)