dark light

UAZ

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 532 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2075130
    UAZ
    Participant

    The Varyag was refitted recently. It rejoined the fleet earlier this year. It is possible that they have equipped her with new missiles.

    – New missiles from S-300/S-400?
    – New Versions of the OSA ?
    – The VULCAN antiship missile replacing the previous BAZALT?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode IV #2468331
    UAZ
    Participant

    NIIP have worked and demonstrated AESAs long before Phazotron, they’re far better funded and will take-over Phazotron unless the latter can find orders for the Zhuk AE pretty soon. They demonstrated AESA X-band mod.blocs and L-band conformal at MAKS’07.

    AFAIK they have orders for the ZHUK. The Mig-29 modernization program for the Indian airforce (60 aircraft, $1 billion deal) which includes the new radars, engines etc.

    in reply to: SU-35 vs. the European fighters #2472620
    UAZ
    Participant

    yes!!! They make claims without any substantial evidence. I have been asking for radar tracking rages all day and have no replay yet ๐Ÿ™‚

    I suggest you download this Su-35 brochure. The information there is by no means complete, but it will answer a lot of your questions.
    http://www.knaapo.ru/media/eng/about/production/military/su-35/buklet_Su35_ENG.zip

    You may also want to watch these Sukhoi made “propaganda” video clips about the Su-35
    http://www.knaapo.ru/eng/products/military/su35_movie.wbp

    http://www.knaapo.ru/eng/products/military/su35_movie_tech.wbp

    in reply to: SU-35 vs. the European fighters #2472628
    UAZ
    Participant

    Su-35, a younger son of Su-27 18:21 | 09/ 07/ 2008

    MOSCOW. (RIA Novosti military commentator Ilya Kramnik) – The first demonstration fight of the Su-35 on July 7, 2008 attracted much attention to this aircraft, which has been undergoing tests since February. The latest addition to the large T-10 (Su-27) family is to become the interim fighter for the Russian Air Force before fifth-generation aircraft are launched into mass production.

    The Su-35, more precisely the Su-35BM, is the second model of the T-10 family to carry that designation. The first Su-35 was manufactured 20 years ago, taking to the skies in 1988 under the designation Su-27M.

    In 1991, it was decided to launch the Su-27M into mass production under the designation Su-35. The first serial aircraft took off in April 1992, though this model was never produced in large numbers. Due to the lack of funding between 1992 and 1995, only 12 Su-35’s were delivered to the Air Force. These aircraft have been used for tests and demonstration flights.

    Soon the Su-37 was developed on the basis of the Su-35. Often confused with the experimental C.37/Su-47 aircraft, the Su-37 was equipped with thrust-vectoring engines, which was the main difference between this model and the Su-35. The No. 711 Su-37 prototype impressed specialists greatly by its outstanding maneuverability, but remained one-of-a-kind.

    In the late 1990’s the Su-35 was given a new lease of life, as the issue of rejuvenating the Russian Air Force was raised again. To avoid excessive growth of designation numbers, the new aircraft was given the designation Su-35BM (“Big Modernization”).

    In 2008, the 117C engine was developed, enabling the designers to start the flight tests of the new aircraft, scheduled to be finished by 2010. The state armament program for 2006-2015, adopted in 2006, envisages mass production of the Su-35BM for the Russian Air Force, and the Defense Ministry is expected to purchase 182 of these aircraft. In addition, technology developed within the Su-35 project will be used to upgrade the Su-27s to the Su-27CM2 standard.

    The creation of the Su-35 is an important step for the Air Force and the aircraft industry. Taking into account that a fifth generation fighter would not be in mass production in Russia before 2015, the Su-35BM will help to close the gap, replacing the older Su-27s, which will be decommissioned starting from the next decade.

    The technical characteristics of the Su-35 are high enough to fulfill this task, outmatching all the modern American, French and EU generation 4+ fighter designs, including the Super Hornet, Rafale and Typhoon. The Su-35 is even able to withstand the world’s only fifth-generation fighter now in production, the F-22, though it is much cheaper than the American fighter – its cost is around $40 million dollars compared with $300 million for F-22.

    Regarding the Defense Ministry’s plans, the question emerges whether the Russian industry would be capable of launching production in the required numbers within the scheduled period. The answer is more likely to be positive: the industrial capacities are beyond doubt, as the production of numerous modifications of Su-27s and Su-30s for export is on the rise. What the program requires is uninterrupted state funding.

    With the Su-35 launched into mass production in 2011, the 182 aircraft ordered by the Defense Ministry would be delivered by 2020. By that time the Russian Air Force would have between 120 and 140 upgraded Su-27s and 30-40 fifth-generation fighters, enabling the Air Force to maintain its combat potential in the next 2-3 decades.

    There have been many successful designs in the history of aviation, but only a few could match rising combat requirements for a number of years, like the famous Messerschmitt Bf-109 and P-51 Mustang fighters, the Tu-95 and B-52 strategic bombers, and the Su-27. The T-10 prototype made its maiden flight in 1977, and another flight in 1981 after major improvements.

    The fighter went into mass production as late as 1984, and it still has the combat potential sufficient to remain one of the world’s best aircraft. The Su-35BM, taking to the skies in 2008, showed even higher performance, an unprecedented improvement on a design developed 30 years ago.

    It’s not easy to forecast what lies ahead for the Su-35, but no doubt it will live through a few decades of service with gradual renewal of armament and avionics, until the moment when this fighter, along with more sophisticated aircraft, will be replaced by aerial vehicles based on new physical principles.

    Source: http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20080709/113624747.html

    Cost is around $40m.
    How many barrels of oil is that?

    in reply to: SU-35 vs. the European fighters #2472675
    UAZ
    Participant

    Yes the su-35 is first prototype, may I remind you the typhoons are in the same situation, T3 ring any bells.

    It is not the same situation. The Typhoon is already in squadron service. The T3 is pretty much known. The Su-35 can be judged only by what Sukhoi is releasing…and what they have released so far is already enough to beat the Typhoon. No wishfull thinking there.

    If you dont know the information how the heck can you claim its better, oh yeah thats right, because you want it to be.

    I guess you have a spy at Sukhoi and according to the info you have you came to the 4.5 to 1 exchange ratio:rolleyes:

    Fanboys:p

    in reply to: SU-35 vs. the European fighters #2472703
    UAZ
    Participant

    Dream on Typhoon fanboy:p

    Your shiny Tiffy has definitly a lower RCS than the Tornado. But I would not call it a LO aircraft. As for its capabilities, impressive they may be, but they are not going to be enough to beat the Su-35 on a consistant basis.

    Don’t want to go into to much details. Suffice to say that the Typhoon is well known. The Su-35 we have seen is just the first prototype. Subsequent prototypes and production models will have some differentiation (typical Russian/Soviet way of bringing products). The Russians are releasing info only bit by bit. A lot is still not known about the Su-35. We don’t even know about some of the newer air to air missiles that are going to equip it with…never mind at what speed it will supercruise with x or y number of missiles attached to its pylons.

    in reply to: SU-35 vs. the European fighters #2473620
    UAZ
    Participant

    Rule of thumb.
    โ€œThe biggest target in the sky, is always the first to die.โ€

    Ok. From now on I will chose the smallest available jet to go for a dogfight.

    Give me an old Mig-15. All the SU-35s, F-22s, Rafales, Typhoons and Grippens will all have been shot down, I will still be flying ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-2 #1786404
    UAZ
    Participant

    Excellent work Modimus Maximus, looking forward to more of the same quality stuff.

    in reply to: The Su-34 'Fullback' Story #2474376
    UAZ
    Participant

    In KNAAPO’s booklet about the Su-35, it is clearly indicated that stealth features are incorporated into the design. But not too much detail is provided. Here is the booklet (in english):

    http://www.knaapo.ru/media/eng/about/production/military/su-35/buklet_Su35_ENG.zip

    Edit: I just realized that this is the Su-34 thread. Otaku’s post mislead me to believe we are talking about the Su-35.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2075458
    UAZ
    Participant

    Talk about artic , there would be any ice left there 30 years from now ๐Ÿ™‚

    Now you know why the Akulas are being retired early:)

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2075465
    UAZ
    Participant

    The Delta IV could equally well operate under ice and so does the Ohio.

    No they can’t. Akula can pierce through a ticker layer of ice and fire its missiles. Makes vaster areas of the arctic available for deployment and firing of missiles. There is the greatest advantage of Akula against all Delta, Ohio and all other SSBNs.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2075476
    UAZ
    Participant

    A lot is not known about the Akula (Typhoon) and even the Ohio.

    Some of the advantages of the Akula:

    – Better endurance (due to ability to carry more food and supplies)
    – More comfortable (saunas, gyms, relaxing areas, Russian baths etc.)
    – More survivable in case of a hit
    – Better ability to launch missiles from ice covered areas.

    But they were hugely expensive and pobably were one of the greatest contributors to the collapse of the Soviet economy.

    A closer comparison would be of Ohios vs Delta IVs. They share a generaly similar layout with the Ohio being bigger one.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2075531
    UAZ
    Participant

    http://paralay.com/885.html

    The Project 885 YASEN (Severodvinsk).

    Look at the photos on the right ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2075597
    UAZ
    Participant

    Project 20380 Stereguschy: SS-N-25? Klub?

    The Steregushy has received the Kh-35 URAN missiles. These photos were taken during May 2008. Future ships may have a different missile (Maybe KLUB).

    http://img58.imageshack.us/img58/5398/attachmentbd8.jpg

    http://img58.imageshack.us/img58/5348/attachmentys7.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2075600
    UAZ
    Participant

    India to get Russian nuclear submarine after 17 yr wait

    India to get Russian nuclear submarine after 17 yr wait

    Moscow, July 3: India will get its first Akula class Russian nuclear submarine in 2009, equipping its navy with the quietest and lethal underwater war machine after a gap of 17 years to enhance its blue water capabilities.
    Factory trials of the multi-role nuclear submarine, christened INS Chakra which India-will get on a 10-year-lease, commenced on June 11 at the Komsomolsk-on-Amur shipyard and will be followed by sea trials, Russian defence sources said, adding it will be delivered by September 2009.

    According to experts, Chakra would help India fill the void caused by the delays in the indigenous Advanced Technology Vessel project to build a nuclear powered, guided missile attack submarine.

    Three Indian naval crews for the nuclear submarine have already been trained at the specially set up training centre in Sosnovy Bor near St. Petersburg.

    This facility would also be used for training crews for the Indian nuclear submarines of ATV project currently in the advanced stages of development, sources said.

    Though they said that India has financed the completion of construction of submarine of project 971 “Shchuka B”(NATO codename Akula) under the USD 650 million deal signed in 2004 as part of the larger Gorshkov package, they did not reveal the cost of the lease of Chakra.

    Akula (Shark) is the quietest Russian attack submarine and Chakra has been christened after its predecessor leased by the Indian Navy in 1988 from the erstwhile USSR.

    In January 1988, ex-USSR had leased K-43 nuclear submarine of project 670 (NATO codename Charlie) which was with the Indian Navy as INS Chakra till March 1991, when under the intense US pressure beleaguered Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev had refused to extend the lease

    source : http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/India-to-get-Russian-nuclear-submarine-after-17-yr-wait/330891/

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 532 total)