dark light

UAZ

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 532 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Military Situation in Georgia, S.O. and Abkhazia #2491542
    UAZ
    Participant

    Here you go: Toshka (SS-21)

    http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/6549/21dk0.jpg

    in reply to: Georgian Su-25 being shot down by SAM #2491583
    UAZ
    Participant

    Total losses so far as reported by the Russian defense ministry :

    3 x Su-25
    1 x Tu-22

    in reply to: The Military Situation in Georgia, S.O. and Abkhazia #2491622
    UAZ
    Participant

    No newbuilt Frogfeet out of the Tbilissi factory. Just limted overhaul/repairs.

    The only factory that can still produce a Frogfoot is the Ulan-Ude factory in Siberia which also produces the Mi-8 helicopters.

    http://www.uuaz.ru/eng/production.htm

    in reply to: The Military Situation in Georgia, S.O. and Abkhazia #2491718
    UAZ
    Participant

    Russian forces have destroyed 1 x Mi-24 and 1 x Mi-8 during attack on Senaki airbase.

    http://www.rian.ru/osetia/20080811/150287090.html

    In Russian.

    in reply to: Georgia invades South Ossetia #2491862
    UAZ
    Participant

    According to a number of Russian sources, recently supplied BUK (from Ukraine) is what brought down the reconaissance BACKFIRE.

    I believe it would be the first combat use of this Russian made SAM.

    Photo of Georgian BUK recently acquired from Ukraine.

    http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/4765/ss854304kv2eg1.jpg

    More photos here: http://pvo.guns.ru/other/georgia/index133.htm

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2074073
    UAZ
    Participant

    B-90 SAROV enters service

    http://arms-tass.su/?page=article&aid=58323&cid=24

    This is the submarine about which there was information leak on the internet (the information was subsequently removed from the net).

    It has enters service now.

    Project 20120.

    According to the above arms tass article, it has completedd state tests and raised the Naval flag on August 7, 2008. Completed at Sevmash.

    in reply to: MiG-31/25PD vs F-4E #2456172
    UAZ
    Participant

    A US Navy F-18 was shot down by an Iraqi Mig-25 during the 1991 gulf war.

    Earlier Iraqis used Mig-25s against the Iranian air force. Iraqis claim many successes (including against F-4s).

    I don’t see why a Mig-25 would not take on a Phantom. It will avoid going against into a dogfight (for obvious reasons), but with its speed and ceiling advantages it will dictate if/where/when a fight will occur. BTW, at high altitude, none of these planes is maneuvrable (specialy with a load of AAMs).

    The Mig-31 vs F-4 : They are not even from the same generation, not a good comparison. It is like F-15 vs Mig-21.

    As for the F-106 vs Mig-21. No actual face-offs in history. The closest thing was an F-102 being shot down by a Mig-21 over Vietnam.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-2 #1786122
    UAZ
    Participant

    Top one is a 9M96, bottom one is a 9M317. Bunch of S-300P launch canisters behind the 9M317 as well.

    SOC,

    The 9M317 shown in the above photo looks like it has folding fins. Probably meant to be launched from a container (rather than a rail type launcher).
    Do you think it is the newer version meant for vertical launch from ships or TELARs?

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-2 #1786128
    UAZ
    Participant

    Putin visiting MMZ AVANGARD factory.

    Can you please identify the missiles?

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/2915/1402412ii9qf5.jpg
    This one looks like the small missile on the S-300PMU-2(Favorit) ?????

    http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/9646/1402386fq6iv5.jpg
    This one looks like the new naval SHTIL version of the BUK????

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2074826
    UAZ
    Participant

    Some more photos from that visit:
    http://ribdesign.jalbum.net/Sovremenyj/

    Thanks 🙂

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-2 #1786168
    UAZ
    Participant

    I wonder what RS-24’s name will be …

    FIDDLER….on the roof

    :diablo:

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2074870
    UAZ
    Participant

    Gollevainen,

    Thanks for the photos. Do you have any more?

    in reply to: Russia flogging MiG-27s to Serbia? #2464864
    UAZ
    Participant

    If I had a war coming I would agree. But for strategic long term air force upgrades the MiGs are of no use. To specialized and still not truly effective. The would be an interim solution.
    Serbia would go for new MiG-29 or Saab Gripen and get 24 of them or so, but that would require Serbia to become financially more healthy. A couple of years in the future, maybe. Even in the Balkans War the Air Force has proved to be a largely useless asset, just added a very convenient target on the NATO list (and something that can be taken out using standard NATO thinking).

    The Balkans are often in turmoil. So, yes a war may be coming anytime (I hope not).

    As for the past air war, the NATO air campain was a small episode of all the Balkan conflict. The Yugoslav air force Migs and Galebs were used for years during the civil war.

    A refurbished Mig-27 should be good for about 10 years and their ability to carry precision guided bombs and missiles makes them a leap over the existing Mig-21, Mig-29, Orao and SuperGaleb etc.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2075039
    UAZ
    Participant

    The MOSKVA is also equipped with VULCAN. It test fired those during the latest deployment/exercises in the Atlantic.

    I would think that the BAZALT production is terminated and the newer VULCAN has taken over.

    in reply to: Russia flogging MiG-27s to Serbia? #2466452
    UAZ
    Participant

    I don’t know why some of you derailed this thread.

    I think it is a typo error from a journalist (mistaking it for Mig-29). But it would make sense. Russia has a large number of stored Mig-27s (and Mig-23s and Su-22s) in flyable condition.

    With minimal refurbishing they can still do a good job.

    It can be a very good deal for many airforces around the world to acquire these aircraft (instead of uber-expensive shiny new ones). The Russians would probably transfer them for free and charge only for modernization/refurbishment.

    I don’t see why some of you here see it as a weird acquisition.

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 532 total)