dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,486 through 1,500 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2151371
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    that is wrong, combat radius depending alot on specific conditions of mission profile such as combat time, loiter time, altitude, speed, load out.. etc

    Aabsolutely. For example the baseline A2G mission (2x2000lb bombs * 2xAMRAAMs) has a 620nm (1150km) combat radius while the A2A profile with 4xAMRAAMs has a 760nm (1410km) Combat radius.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2151869
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Here is a slide from a early 2016 Briefing

    http://i.imgur.com/jMDocjY.png

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2151925
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Not sure on the FLIR issue as I can’t ID this pod. I am thinking HTM (HARM Targeting Pod), but that usually has a white, pointy nose.

    https://static.dvidshub.net/media/thumbs/photos/1608/2813554/1000w_q95.jpg

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2151944
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Interesting statement considering there were FLIR and AESA fitted Superhornets, Growlers, F-16’s and AWACS aircraft involved in that exercise.

    Yes to all

    fyi, there were 14 F-35s there.

    https://static.dvidshub.net/media/thumbs/photos/1608/2826383/1000w_q95.jpg

    Tons of more photos here:

    https://www.dvidshub.net/search/?filter%5Bunit%5D=33FW

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2151957
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The EOTS can also use passive ranging based on target recognition.

    No to the LWR btw IIRC.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2152037
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I am assuming that the F16s had radar warning detectors, so the F35s must have got the firing solution from offboard sensors, or did I miss something.

    F-35’s AESA radar (just like the F-22 before it) has very advanced LPI modes that along with the EOTS allow the F-35 to engage targets without letting its presence be known.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2152286
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    RAFALE dev coûts are public on sénateur site aswell as unit cost

    Google translate says “BURST public costs are one senator website as well as unit cost”

    Whisky Tango???

    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Correct, it’s more of an EODAS-Lite application.

    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I haven’t come across any of those plans.

    http://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed/data/mfc/pc/missile-launch-detector-mld/mfc-mld-pc.pdf

    Lockheed Martin continues to advance the modular design of MLD with the
    development of both high resolution and multi-spectral sensors and an expanded
    algorithm that incorporates situational awareness and defensive Infrared Search and
    Track (IRST).

    in reply to: Rise of the 6th Generation Fighter … #2152941
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    According to the USAF plan, it looks like their F-X will start dev in the early 3030’s with planned reduction to the F-22 force in the early 2040’s.

    http://static2.businessinsider.com/image/57c593e409d293c4058b51b0-1267/screen%20shot%202016-08-30%20at%209.49.07%20am.png

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2154191
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    OF COURSE the pilots would prefer the F-35 above and beyond the teens — they are not stupid.

    I was trying to show that when a knowledgeable ex-pilot sits down with F-35 pilots that have previous 4th gen experience, that there was nothing to tell him “that they wont tell the general public, for fear of reprisals from the Pentagon for not toeing the political line”.

    Sure they needed a deterrence; the question I am asking is:

    If they had reduced the F-22 R&D budget by, say, 25%, would the resultant F-22 no longer work as deterrent?

    Same goes for the F-35.

    Certainly “less” of a deterrent.

    The question would be, what would you remove from the dev budget? Whet system(s) or capability would you remove?

    Keep in mind that the dev budget for the F-35 is only $60 billion (1996-2021).

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2154582
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Im quite sure with all his contacts in the military Yeager is kept abreast of developments. Consider the fact that these military contacts will tell Yeager the truth that they wont tell the general public, for fear of reprisals from the Pentagon for not toeing the political line.

    http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/archive/2016/september/Pages/AirForceF35ProponentsStrikeBackatCritics.aspx

    John Venable, a former F-16 pilot with more than 3,000 hours of flying time, who is now a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation.

    “When people talk about situational awareness, it is exponentially higher in this airplane than it has been in any airplane up to this point. And that is a godsend for the guys in the fighter cockpits,” he said in an interview.

    Venable penned an Aug. 4 backgrounder report for the foundation in which he interviewed 31 F-35A pilots and asked them to compare their new aircraft with their previous fighters in terms of maneuverability, stealth and tactics.

    He noted that fighter pilots were well known for blunt opinions and a lack of tact. As an outsider he was met with a good deal of skepticism.

    “When I walked out of these [interviews] I got the gospel on what each man genuinely believed about both of his jets,” he said. Their first aircraft is the love of their life and the F-35A is “the mistress” they are unsure about. The pilots had F-15C, F-16C, F-15E and A-10 backgrounds, but none came from the F-22 community.

    Maneuverability in a dogfight has been a big question mark since a leaked report in 2015 called into question the F-35A’s air-to-air performance over a fourth-generation aircraft.

    Venable noted at the time of that test F-35A pilots were governed by software control laws, known as CLAWS, that limited them to three to five Gs during turns.
    There have been big strides since then and they are now limited to seven Gs. Ultimately, they will be allowed nine Gs. For the purpose of the survey, he asked the pilots to consider only what the aircraft can do now at seven Gs and to not speculate on how it would perform when the software no longer restricted them.

    All but two of the pilots thought the F-35A outperformed his previous airplane in air-to-air combat engagements. The two who didn’t favored their old F-15Cs in the 9,000-foot perch setup, a high-altitude combat scenario.

    In beyond-visual-range scenarios, they all chose the F-35. For setups where energy and maneuverability are critical to success, they chose it 80 percent of the time.

    “The F-35A was not designed to be an air superiority fighter, but the pilots interviewed conveyed the picture of a jet that will more than hold its own in that environment — even with its current G and maneuver restrictions,” Venable wrote.

    All of the pilots ended up saying that they would choose the F-35 over their previous jet, although Venable said that question wasn’t included in the survey. “I decided to let the numbers speak for themselves,” he said.

    So, A pilot with 3000 hrs in a modern combat jet interviews 31 other pilots (note no names so there is no need hold back) who have experience in 4th gen fighters & the F-35 at Block 3i and they all want the F-35, a majority of them even in a knife-fight.

    in reply to: Low Level…… #2154613
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    You’re going to have to re=host that image on imgur, photobucket, etc as the rest of us can’t see it.

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2154623
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    You’re going to have to re=host that image on imgur, photobucket, etc as the rest of us can’t see it.

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2154930
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Fact is that he has no real experience of modern air combat, especially in the days of Active AAMs, HOBS, AESA radars, DEFM jammers, and stealth.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,486 through 1,500 (of 4,849 total)