dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2122327
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Oh ffs…..

    But my questions is still the same: Has any other platform demonstrated simultaneous A2A kills?

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2122329
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    F-35 takes out two air targets simultaneously

    Last year, an F-35 pilot fired two Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles at maneuvering drones in the air, bringing synchronized attack to a new level for the aircraft, using an integrated targeting sensor, called the Electro-Optical Targeting System (EOTS).

    Two AMRAAMs had multiple targets – to shoot two airborne targets simultaneously. It was a complex set up that happened over the Pacific. They were shooting at drones, Lt. Col. Tucker Hamilton, F-35 Test Director, Edwards AFB, told reporters last year.

    I thought that this had already been done. Is this a case of a journalist just getting it wrong, this just being the fist time that it was actually demonstrated, or was it just the 1st time for the F-35?

    https://defensemaven.io/warriormaven…EivRmOxHMfbjA/

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2122332
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Governments are waking up to the fact that “guaranteed offsets” in the form of program related contracts only leads to cost increases. This was the main reason why the recent Japanese plans for more F-35 will NOT be produced locally but will instead come from the established F-35 line in Texas.

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2122519
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Don’t waste money replacing the C/D/E fleet with X. Use the money to accelerate PCA and replace them with that.

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2122532
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Bribes = “Campaign Donations” & Lobbying

    They happen ALL the time

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2122541
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The F-15X will never be cheaper than the F-35 unless Boeing takes a loss on the jet.

    If it was at all justifiable on any grounds then the USAF themselves would be for it… they are not.

    Corporate Welfare & bribes/lobbing/nest-feathering…. pure and simple.

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2123134
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I remember a specific claim to supersonic weapon usage for the F-35 many years ago in a PDF and I’ll try and find it. In the meantime, I found this in the 2012 DOT&E report.

    The test team completed supersonic clean wing flutter testing with the weapons bay doors open and closed, clearing the F-35A Block 2B envelope to 1.6 Mach/700 knots calibrated airspeed

    http://www.dote.osd.mil/pub/reports/…2013f35jsf.pdf

    1st Supersonic F-35 AMRAAM launch 7/16/2013

    https://www.codeonemagazine.com/article.html?item_id=123

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2123165
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The F-35 is not going Mach 1.6 with external stores. That speed is for Internal Weps only.

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2123171
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    F-22 JDAM at Mach 1.5 news release here:
    https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2006…tude-JDAM-Drop

    On the F-35, here is a quote from Adm Winter in testimony to Congress:

    From:VICE ADMIRAL MATHIAS WINTER PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER F-35 LIGHTNING II PROGRAM

    The delivery of Block 3F improves warfighting capability with enhanced sensors and targeting, improved data links, improved threat countermeasures, and enhanced weapons capability to include air-to-air missiles, air-to-ground munitions, and weapons employment throughout the full aircraft flight envelope {ie Mach 1.6}.

    https://docs.house.gov/meetings/AS/A…M-20180307.pdf

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2123177
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The F-35 can deploy weapons from it’s internal bay up to it’s full rated combat speed of Mach 1.6.

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2123666
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    What is that graphic supposed to represent?

    btw, it’s funny that the pic of the “JSF” is actually an F-22.

    –edit–
    google translate = “Outcomes of the multi-criteria analysis, in points”

    Nothing has substantial has changes since the eval. It would be interesting to see what happened between the Rafales & UK F-35Bs in the latest LFE.

    in reply to: 2018 F-35 News and Discussion #2123694
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    We can see part of that “$12k” drop in the annual RCPFH numbers released by the DoD.

    https://i.imgur.com/CLOLZKT.png

    Where RCPFH sits in the whole CPFH schema:

    https://i.imgur.com/j3Wsxrh.png

    in reply to: 2018 F-35 News and Discussion #2123711
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    There are a range of options from letting them use the FMS & other training tools to sending some of their test pilots through the F-35’s transition course.

    in reply to: 2018 F-35 News and Discussion #2124057
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    What version and in what Year$ ?

    Linked is the FY2019 F-35 SAR that breaks everything down by version.

    http://www.f-16.net/forum/download/file.php?id=27020

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2124147
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Mounting a radar-reflector is only required if radars can’t see you without one :rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 4,849 total)