JAGM itself includes a new motor that is fast-jet compatible. JAGM-F just adds ejector capability which is why they think the dev can be done in 2 years.
If you are asking can EODASv2 be put into existing F-35s then yes.
Other existing fighters, only after a lengthy development process.
Other fighters that have not been developed, yes as they can just add it to their normal dev process.
IIRC the original EODAS is 1024*1024 which puts Gen2 at ~2300*2300
The first EODAS unit was produced in the early 2000’s to meet the spec at the time. Obviously advancements in miniaturization, ruggedness, optics, etc will make today’s tech better. This is why the Block4 (Lot15) EODAS from Raytheon is 5x the res (explains the “2x performance” claim), 5x the reliability, and 45% cheaper not to mention likely being a drop-in replacement for current EODAS units. The original EODAS never had a problem meeting the original spec and the new one will just be better at it and enable more functionality (like TBM tracking, ground-fires, etc).
F-35 is getting internal JAGM-F via SDB rack. Likely to be part of Block 4.1.
CoAspire personnel attended the open HASC Markup session on May 9, 2018 where JAGM-F and other issues were debated and voted on. JAGM-F Missile amendments (an additional $10M total authorized for Navy and Marine Corps) were voted on “En Bloc” and the vote was bi-partisan and unanimous. (CoAspire Photo)
On Wednesday, May 9th 2018 during the FY19 NDAA markup, the House Armed Services Committee (HASC) passed two “En Bloc” amendments for the JAGM-F missile program for the FY19 National Defense Authorization Act. En Bloc amendments are cleared in a bi-partisan process in advance by the HASC and are voted on during the day-long markup process. Both En Bloc votes that included JAGM-F were unanimous.
For those not familiar with the process, the House Armed Services Committee conducts their mark-up of the NDAA in an open, televised forum and members of the public can sit in the limited public seating area and watch the debate and votes in person. Some of the amendments can be controversial. The ones on the JAGM-F were not, and had senior, bi-partisan support.
Here is a link to a Defense News article that lists the En Bloc amendments.
The first amendment passed by the full committee (EB7 117r1) authorizes an additional $5M for JAGM-F missile studies and analysis for the Navy for their F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and F-35C aircraft, and an additional $5M on a separate line for the USMC for their F/A-18C/D, AV-8B and F-35B/C aircraft.
The second amendment (EB2 177) requests a briefing by the Department of the Navy to the committee on the services’ plans for JAGM-F integration on its fighter aircraft to replace the Laser Maverick missile that will be out of inventory in the coming decade. This type of briefing request is expected when the committee authorizes additional funding, to ensure the services have a good plan moving forward.
The US Air Force has requested $31.596M in the FY19 budget to begin JAGM-F integration activities on their aircraft, and the $10M for the DoN will allow both the Navy and Marine Corps to begin their studies and analysis in concert with the Air Force in FY19 and beyond.
The JAGM-F missile is an eject-launched, fighter-capable derivative the JAGM missile that is a dual-mode seeker missile incorporating an active millimeter-wave radar and a semi-active laser seeker. The JAGM missile is a follow-on to the the Hellfire missile and will IOC on the US Army’s Apache helicopter and the US Marine Corps’ Cobra helicopter.
More digging found this in the FY2019 budget.
Joint Air-to-Ground Missile for Fixed Wing Aircraft (JAGM-F) is an improvement to the Army’s JAGM which will allow the missile to be released from fixed wing aircraft in order to eliminate time sensitive moving targets and high value covered/sheltered targets. JAGM-F will be able to combat adverse weather/low visibility battlefield and countermeasure environments and austere communication environments and have the ability to engage multiple targets types near simultaneously in multiple engagement modes. Efforts include but are not limited to testing, qualification, and design/build demo components to production standards. Intent is to meet all BRU-55, BRU-57, and BRU-61 environments.
http://www.dtic.mil/descriptivesum/Y2019/AirForce/stamped/U_0604602F_5_PB_2019.pdf
So, the outstanding question of how the JAGM is to be internally carried in the F-35 is put to paper, it will use the SDB’s BRU-61 rack. That should give it some good CAS flexibility. Imagine 2xSDB1, 2xSDB2, and 4xJAGM-F internal for CAS.
AIAA Aviation 2018 (Day 2)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]261230[/ATTACH]
At the 20:10 mark:
At the 23:00 mark:
At the 26:20 mark:
At the 39:30 mark:
At the 43:10 mark:
At the 47:32 mark:
The best info will be in the breakout sessions. Unfortunately, they will not be streamed.
And mismatched nozzles….