dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,751 through 3,765 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Japan launches F-X fighter RFP #2360334
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Rii, are you a secret member of ABJ?

    Anyhow, The F-35 has better range, warload, SA, & survivability than any F-16/18 flying.

    in reply to: Japan launches F-X fighter RFP #2360392
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Even if you hang weapons externally on the F-35 it still has a better RCS sig than 4th gen, better SA, better radar, better range, etc.

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2360397
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Sorry, that’s what I get for skimming too fast 😉

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2360405
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The F-35 can release a weapon MUCH closer to a target than the Rafale can so the SDB1&2 work just fine. There is also JSM, JADM-ER, JSOW & JSOW-ER that can be carried internally.

    One of the F-35’s icing layers (UAI) makes adding weapons the easiest upgrade on the F-35 (and easier than any other production fighter today). All that is needed is for Sagem to create the flight profile, certify separation, and the AASM could be flying on F-35s worldwide the next day, no block upgrade needed.

    Add to that the fact that AASM is a add-on kit like JDAM, a US company (LM, Boeing, ATK, Raytheon, etc) could partner with Sagem to bring the AASM extension tech to the JDAM family.

    btw, Stormshadow (Scalp EG) is being certified for the F-35, so no Rafale advantage there.

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2360446
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Then it’s a good thing that the JSF has nice THICK layers of icing 😉

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2360459
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    It’s all about the stealth 🙂

    Everything else is icing on the cake.

    in reply to: Japan launches F-X fighter RFP #2360897
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    In terms of domestic production & tech transfer, yes the EF & SH would be a better fit.

    Maybe Japan could buy their way into the SDD program? I am sure there are some European countries that would like a few billion dollars 🙂

    in reply to: Japan launches F-X fighter RFP #2360903
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    That is my point, any SH R&D & upgrades would be paid by Japan thereby removing the singular SH benefit: price.

    in reply to: Japan launches F-X fighter RFP #2360957
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The USN does not want to spend money on upgrading the SH though. Just look at the apathetic solution for an IRST they came up with! They have also said no to new engine dev.

    As to when they could get the F-35, they could start receiving Blk2 jets by 2013/14. This would get their training wings up and running (the F-2 wing destroyed in teh tsunami was a training wing), perform basic A2A & A2G missions, and could be upgraded to Blk3 & beyond within a couple of years.

    in reply to: Japan launches F-X fighter RFP #2360969
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Spud…. you are describing an IOC 2018 scenario there? 2019?

    Blk 3 is what I was referring to.

    How can you begin to assume what a creatively upgraded SH could go to Red Flag with in 2018/2019, fully equipped and asymmetrically armed for less than the raw F-35A unit Weapon system cost (no weapons included)?

    I already gave the SH props for a lower price. Don’t ruin it by adding on R&D & upgrade costs.

    BTW, a specialized follow-on ALQ-218 V3 + a next gen LW IRST equipping such next-gen 2018 SH would enable superior BVR situational awareness. Just add a modified asymmetrical AAM capability and Litening or Sniper SE pod for added superiority. imho.

    And there is the rub. Who is going to pay for all this R&D?
    How does it compare to the post-SDD R&D for the F-35?

    The post-SDD R&D has a much better chance of happening, and will be cheaper, due to a large user base that has already started funding it. That cannot be said for the SH. That might change if SH goes to Brazil, India, & Japan… but those are big if’s.

    Wrong; it has more advantages that price. It’s available today.

    That would be relevant if Japan wanted delivery today, which the do not.

    in reply to: Japan launches F-X fighter RFP #2361168
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    hehe.. the ABJ crowd (Anything But JSF) strikes again 😉

    Seriously? The only think the SH has over the JSF is price (oh wait, it looses that when you add all the upgrades you want). In virtually every other category (range w/warload, sensors, survivability) the F-35 wins hands-down.

    in reply to: Someone Besides Hot Dogs's F-35 Cyber News Thread #5 #2361644
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The main reason why the B was cut has to do with the “probation” it was placed on. Once that clears the build numbers will be back up. Actually, I did expect something like this when they announced the probationary period, especially since they have not announced a perm fix to the structural issue.

    If this had been a cut showing overall disapproval of the F-35 program, they would have also cut the C and certainly would not have increased the A buy.

    in reply to: Someone Besides Hot Dogs's F-35 Cyber News Thread #5 #2361735
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Senate FY2011 deal cuts $2.16 billion from budget

    Source:
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-12/lockheed-martin-f-35-fighter-program-loses-2-16-billion-under-budget-deal.html

    Relevant info:
    F-35A – production increased from 22 to 25
    F-35B – production cut from 13 to 3
    F-35C – no change from 7 requested

    in reply to: Someone Besides Hot Dogs's F-35 Cyber News Thread #5 #2362453
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    F-35B Achieves First Push-Button Landing

    From the Airforce-Magazine.com

    Just Push “Auto-Land”: A Lockheed Martin F-35B short takeoff and vertical landing test aircraft last week achieved an impressive milestone, according to Warren Boley, Pratt & Whitney military engines president. “For the first time,” Boley said in an interview, “a pilot pushed a button and the [air]plane landed autonomously.” Boley joked that the pilot could fold his hands behind his head or “read the paper” while the airplane safely settled down to a vertical landing from hover. The flight was the 74th vertical landing of the F-35 test program, and the fact that the Marine Corps was willing to allow the test indicated high confidence in the airplane and its Pratt-supplied F135 engine, Boley told the Daily Report April 8. —John A. Tirpak

    in reply to: Replacing the F-15E #2363513
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    When the F-35B takes off from a runway it can carry 15k of weapons (which is more than the weight of an empty Harrier!). What is the Harrier’s max?

    I am not sure of the F-35B’s STO max weapons load though from a carrier deck.

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/c9477552.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 3,751 through 3,765 (of 4,849 total)