dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,666 through 4,680 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: More good JSF news and program updates #2433272
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    If the JSF stealthy features work as advertised against future radars, including AEW&C and/or ground radars.

    And those will be the first targets of JASSM, JSOW-ER, HARM & JDRADM

    If it can use its own radar without revealing its position.

    It has the best radar in the world (save the F-22), can use off-board sensors, and can use it’s IRST.

    If it can quickly enough identify the targets as hostile.

    IRST and it automatically shares data with all the fighters in the area. Each F-35 can concentrate on a few targets and everyone benefits. Besides, if it’s a massed assault, what else can it be?

    If the missiles active seekers can get a lock on against present and future EW systems

    That’s what HOJ functions are for. Also, JDRADM will also have IIR and HARM functions.

    or the enemy lacks MAWS that can use lasers to fry a possible future passive IR seeker.

    And what fighter is the only one to have a written schedule and development to install these devices.. oh yeah, F-35

    If it has enough missiles to take down all hostiles before getting into visual range

    Lead F-35s carrying 4 internal AAM (6 with Blk5) and support F-35s carrying 14-16 AAMs… that seems enough

    If it can get to and stay in the fight without tankers

    The F-35 can fly with internal fuel as far as 4th gen fly with external tanks. Besides, the F-35 can also carry external tanks and drop them for max VLO before entering the fight.

    or it can defend those tankers.

    Because of the F-35’s inherent long range, the tankers can stay farther away. Any Flankers that get through will be handled by the CAP assigned to the tankers.

    If it is enough of them to keep enough presence in the air during an attack.

    Again, range is not an issue.

    If nothing unpredicted happens that can play havoc with the scenario.

    Of course, if not all of this works out perfectly it just becomes fanboy fantasies.

    For the Flankers to survive, virtually EVERYTHING has to go wrong for the F-35s.. now who is talking “fanboy fantasies”?

    in reply to: The definitive version of the F 35 HMD ! #2433309
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    How big is the EF’s fov? The F-35’s is a 30×50 degree window projected directly into the eyes.

    in reply to: More good JSF news and program updates #2433312
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    After 2020 the Flankers might not get even that warning as JDRADM has an IIR seeker.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion III #2433337
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Don’t know, but you can use the same ratio.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion III #2433340
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    If Zhuk-ME can detect a 5 m2 target at a range of 120 km then how far it will be capable to detect a 1.2 m2 target ‘PAF F-16’?

    About 75km

    in reply to: More good JSF news and program updates #2433351
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    flankers come in heerds with shear firepower, speed, and endurance each, lightings dont..
    F-35 as a system have some really good sides, but lacks in some other.
    And and that is a hole other thread ๐Ÿ™‚

    Actually, it’s quite the opposite and here is why.

    In order to “mass” together, the Flanker has to know where you are coming from. In a 4th gen world this is possible due to long range radars and AWACS.

    With the F-35, they will not have such a long warning time and will either have to be flying around waiting to pounce (and burning through planes and pilots), or be stationed at many airfields in the area. Both of which preclude massed defensive assaults.

    One other thing about the report itself, it is a “doom and gloom” report that is already ignoring a few items:

    1. The recent news that LM has come under budget for the F-35’s by 3% and 5% during the last two LRIP cycles. This gives credence to LM’s cost predictions and undermines the JET & GAO naysayers.

    2. Norway in 2008, even knowing of a worsening economic climate, has requested MORE F-35s than they originally stated in the RFP.

    3. Israel, knowing that the F-35 will best serve their needs in a high SAM threat environment, want early LRIP jets even knowing they will cost more. The only stumbling block is TOT, not cost.

    4. Korea and Japan have canceled their indigenous LO fighter development programs. This open’s the market up even more for the F-35. Secdef Gates will be in Japan within the month to discus the F-35 among other things.

    5. There is Turkey which has already been mentioned (announced too late for this report).

    in reply to: 50% of F-135 parts thrown out #2433353
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The US House of Reps has just APPROVED funds for the F136 that are SEPARATE from the F-35 program… NO F-35’s are to be cut to pay for it.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN0853778020091008

    in reply to: The definitive version of the F 35 HMD ! #2433653
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    There is a youtube video somewhere that shows that video and some basic data is shown wherever the pilot looks. As the pilot swivels around to face the front, the traditional HUD data comes into view.

    in reply to: The definitive version of the F 35 HMD ! #2433680
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The F-35’s HMD displays full data and video in a 360 view no matter where the pilot looks.

    F-35 HMD
    Parameter ——- Characteristic
    Field of View —– 30ยบ X 50ยบ
    Accuracy ———- Less than 2 mr RMS
    Contrast ———-> 1.2 at 10,000 Ft L
    Resolution ——-1280 X 1024

    in reply to: Tanker Draft RFP party #2433712
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    They can use them… they will just drop them at the border.

    This is actually moot since they are designed to carry a HUGE amount of fuel internally.

    in reply to: More good JSF news and program updates #2433750
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Oh, I get it JOhan BOeder.

    Otaku’s statement is a little off since it was a report made FOR the Dutch Parliament, not BY the Dutch Parliament… big difference.

    1. Did they request or commission it?

    2. Was the info independently verified?

    3. What experience does the author have in defense analysis?

    4. Since anyone can write a report, what gives the author credibility?

    5. Since the report is not on Dutch government servers, can I assume they have not accepted it?

    6. Is John the “Kopp” of the Netherlands?

    in reply to: More good JSF news and program updates #2433808
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Who is JOBO (the creators of the document)?

    in reply to: Quick Northrop YA-9 question #2433824
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Looks like A-10, but a little too far forward.

    http://www.combatreform.org/A10cutaway.gif

    The A-9’s gun was set back (see above A-9 cutaway in Post#4)

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world – III #2433861
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The “is in the high $40 millions” quote forgot to mention that the price is in 2002 inflation adjusted numbers.. still cheap.

    in reply to: Future dogfights #2433879
    SpudmanWP
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 4,666 through 4,680 (of 4,849 total)