dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,681 through 4,695 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Tanker Draft RFP party #2433883
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The lease made sense and would have been cheaper considering all the extra expense of maintaining the KC-135s that we now have to do.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode IX #2433944
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Let me guess…. stelth jet?

    in reply to: Quick Northrop YA-9 question #2433955
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Here is a cutaway

    http://www.hitechweb.genezis.eu/fightersAP10.files/NorthropA-9A-1.jpg

    in reply to: Tanker Draft RFP party #2433961
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Thanks McCain…..

    in reply to: Quick Northrop YA-9 question #2433964
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    In a position similar to the A-10. Check this photo and notice the offset front landing gear and centerline trough.

    http://data.primeportal.net/hangar/bill_spidle/ya-9a/YA-9A_71-1368_20031112_013.jpg

    A good walkaround site is here.
    http://www.primeportal.net/hangar/bill_spidle/ya-9a_walk_1.htm

    I can get an even better shot if you REALLY need it 😉

    in reply to: Future dogfights #2434014
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    LOL, IIRC in the Su-35 vid they shot down the Eurofighters before shoothing the B-52s flying next to them.

    Would’nt they have targeted the B-52s first since they would have been detected first? Unless they are saying the EF has the RCS of a B-52. 🙂

    in reply to: Future dogfights #2434269
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Not likely ever.

    The F-35 can support the F-22 in this role. Each F-35 can carry 14 AAMs at IOC and 16+ after Blk 5. They also benefit from having a much lower RCS than the B-1R.

    in reply to: Future dogfights #2434351
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Another technical problem.

    The MQ-9B’s outer pylon cannot carry the HARM (too heavy) and the Reaper cannot employ the HARM anyways due to not having the sensors to handle it.

    in reply to: Future dogfights #2434356
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Yes very one sided and optimistic.

    Another problem I saw, using Reapers as decoys instead of MLDs.

    in reply to: Future dogfights #2434376
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The missile was a IR version (the R-73)… so the DIRCM was a possibility.

    Other technical goofs I saw:

    1. They used a R-73 in the above video but referred to it loosing radar lock due to the F-35’s regaining radar VLO.

    2. Rotating radar display in the lower/center LCD

    3. HARMs being carried on the outboard A2A stations (they are too heavy)

    in reply to: Future dogfights #2434396
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Yes it was overly optimistic show.

    The only way that missile dodge would work is if:

    1. It was an IR missile and the F-35 got it’s planed DIRCM

    2. It was an radar missile and it was jammed by the the F-22, a nearby F-35, or the F-35 itself.

    Which segment of the show did that appear? I would like to verify my thoughts.

    in reply to: Advanced Tactical Laser Video #2434488
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    No evidence of any holes on the hood.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion III #2435169
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    JSOW-ER 300 NM range

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion III #2435359
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The gripen NG can carry 2x IR AAMs, 2x BVR AAMs, 2x large tanks and 2x 2000lb class weapons at the same time.

    http://gib.gripen.com/gripen/Standard/Thumbnail.ThumbnailServlet?recordView=SearchResult_RecordInfo&catalogID=1&recordID=69634&imageSize=256&errorURL=../images/DefaultThumbnail.jpg

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion III #2435672
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Ditto… ixne on the 5th gen.

Viewing 15 posts - 4,681 through 4,695 (of 4,849 total)