dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,231 through 1,245 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2145831
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    LM has already said that the MLD can do it but would take other avionics upgrades to be able to use the data. Unfortunately there is not enough money for F-22 dev due to the horrendous ROI.

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2146124
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    where are the aircraft going to come from? USN stocks? Boeing-owned airframes?

    It would be quite funny if Australia took the opportunity to be an all F-35 force now that the F-35 is near Block 3F and the prices have stabilized.

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2146167
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The Canadian move to the SH lease is a political move that when the cards are laid on the table, will finally put a nail in the coffin of the “cheap SH” myth.

    The idea of an F-35 that is more expensive than its contemporaries was true early in the LRIP process, but thanks to the price dropping 3-5% per year is no longer the case.

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2146186
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Maybe the CPU card… maybe.

    Unless the build a but-ton of them the money is just not there for a wholesale redo of the avionics.

    If they did, the best approach is to piggyback on the F-35 avionics, especially the EOTS.

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2146216
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    There is not a need to “stick” with anything, the interim “buy” is a “lease”.

    http://news.gc.ca/web/article-en.do?nid=1158669&tp=1

    “The Government will enter into discussions with the U.S. Government and Boeing regarding use of these jets for an interim period of time. “

    That screams lease.

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2146252
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Look at every recent export order of a comparable modern fighter… they are all more expensive than the F-35 which was $195 each in the South Korea deal.

    https://i.imgur.com/zirJp0F.png

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2146282
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Yeah I have to agree. As much as I hate to admit it, I think the F-35 would be better off for us than the Sub-par hornet. Trudeau vehemently said that he would not go for the F-35 even if it turned out to be the best. IF they were to hold an open competition, he would lose face, and that can’t happen. This interim buy will become permanent and the competition will be written to favor the Stupid bee and more will be procured.

    Watch them “require” a second engine, no JSF, done in 1.

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2146302
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Probably although the press release also uses the term acquisition which carries the connotation of ownership against lease.

    In governmental terms anytime you get something, be it through a buy, rent, lease,etc… it’s all covered under “acquisition”.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2146319
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    MODS—

    Can we get the Canadian related back-n-forth moved to the Canadian thread?

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?138133-Canadian-Fighter-Replacement

    Tangents… more than just a math problem

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2146332
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Right, so the Canadians are replacing the less expensive F-35A by more expensive Super Hornet as an interim solution, you say..

    Funny that until summer 2016 Canadians seemed perfectly informed and very objective for you..

    Like I said… political decision that had little to do with the realities of the day.

    It’s clear as hell that the Korean/Saudi/Kuwaiti deals are not even remotely comparable.. but don’t get disturbed by the facts and continue your rant..

    You would think that one, ANY one of the Rafale, EF, F-18, or F-15 deals would be cheaper than either of the F-35 FMS deals… but they are not. You can’t blame it on exchange rates since there are US deals on both sides of the fence. You can’t blame it on platform since there were 4 to choose from that are all more expensive.

    There is simply no hard number you can point to (apples to apples) that shows that the F-35 is more expensive than the Rafale, EF, F-18SH, for F-15E+ when dealing with an export customer. The closest that anyone came was Boeing and the SK deal where they got to hide the details (no FMS docs) and did not have to include a whole host of items (support, training, tooling, etc) since SK already had advanced F-15Ks.

    Canada having a open competition would have been a first where the Rafale might compete and we can finally do a definitive Apples to Apples comparison, but they will likely chicken out like they did before.

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2146348
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    It’s a lease, not an outright “buy”.

    Here is the official government press release:

    http://news.gc.ca/web/article-en.do?nid=1158669&tp=1

    The Government will enter into discussions with the U.S. Government and Boeing regarding use of these jets for an interim period of time.

    That screams lease.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2146367
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Here is a cost breakdown of recent export sales.

    https://i.imgur.com/zirJp0F.png

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/feature/5/178870/us-fighter-prices-explode-as-production-end-nears.html

    Keep in mind that the price of an F-35A has dropped significantly since the South Korean deal that even then was ~$195 per (with weapons).

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2146381
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    agree, lest they have a contract with USN to buy them once they make up their mind

    Congress will have to sign off on that and most of them know that an agreement like that will just end up making the F-35 cost more as it will reduce the F-35C buy. The USN cannot make any kind of contract like that on their own.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2146387
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Oh, what happened to your “those with access to real F-35 data know better than fanboys on the forum” rhetoric?

    Canada is not making an informed decision.. there has not been a competition or even a detailed RFP. It’s purely political.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2146417
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    the F-35 is cheaper than the Rafale, just ask Spud..

    Look at every single FMS sale for the F-18/15/Rafale vs the F-35 (Japan & SK) and the F-35 is cheaper. This jives with the leaked per-plane Rafale cost in the Indian deal ($103 mil each before the $50 mil each customization fee).

    The recent Kuwait F-18 FMS doc says $10.1 billion for 32 F-18s with weapons. The South Korean F-35 deal was less than $8 billion for 40 F-35s with weapons.

    http://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/government-kuwait-fa-18ef-super-hornet-aircraft-support

    The F-15QA deal is $21.1 billion for 72 planes.

    http://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/government-qatar-f-15qa-aircraft-weapons-and-related-support

Viewing 15 posts - 1,231 through 1,245 (of 4,849 total)