dark light

emile

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 525 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MiG-29 kontra F-16 (aerodynamics…) #2339689
    emile
    Participant

    The MiG-29 was suppressed by Su-27 due to its original version’s stable layout. However, if you calculate wing load, T/W rate, and scrutinize the aerodynamic design for MiG-29, it more balanced than Su-27 to be you will find out.
    The MiG-29 became the unstable layout now.

    in reply to: Weapon bays, internal or external #2340465
    emile
    Participant

    I have no idea about external weapon bay, what does it look like?

    in reply to: Question about Platform #2341669
    emile
    Participant

    Using F1 car to plough? I don’t think so. The F-35B are capable to fly extremely slow to hovering. The only problem here will be the fuel consumption.

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 7 #2341760
    emile
    Participant

    Appreciate so much to TongXu
    What the guy’s drawing is highly matched the real one and much surpass others.

    in reply to: Question about Platform #2341802
    emile
    Participant

    Don’t think the F-35B’s seat will unable to be retrofitted as juxtaposition?

    in reply to: Question about Platform #2342067
    emile
    Participant

    I don’t think the F-35 has the endurance or the range for ASW duty.

    In terms of fuel capacity related to its size, F-35 must be one of greatest range of aircraft among carrier of US navy although we have no detailed data, and hovering shall be considered.

    in reply to: Typhoons evenly matched with F-22's #2342312
    emile
    Participant

    Eurofighter down F-22 as a fact rely on many specific condition which we would never know unless there is overview video released.
    According to the video in airshow, Eurofighter is the very agile fighter flying like a leaf whose direction almost impossible to predict.
    However, I have to say without TVC, the post-stall will be unable to done by either Eurofighter or Rafale or Gripen or any canards fighter even J-10 and J-20. Thus gives F-22 a probable chance to gain some advantage in close combat.
    Given to the history case it is completely possible that an advanced fighter was shot by an inferior fighter, Me262 downed by P-51, Zero downed by Wildcat, F-4 phantom downed by MiG-17, F-16 downed by MiG-23, and so on for example.
    Circumstances determines everything, we should remember that.

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 7 #2347547
    emile
    Participant

    From what we have seen in airshows at least, Su-35 outdoes what Su-27 did in low speed maneuvers.

    which J-20 will unable to do unless TVC be fitted.

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 7 #2348904
    emile
    Participant

    😎

    The wingspan you put is reasonable, but you have to realize the J-20 has significantly larger L/W ratio than F-22 and PAKFA and whatever contemporary fighters.

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 7 #2349725
    emile
    Participant

    The diameter of WP6 J-8II used is less than 700mm, the diameter of AL-31 for J-20 will be greater than 1000mm.
    We assume the diameter to both are same.
    http://i45.tinypic.com/33w9w2c.jpg
    Let’s see what length the J-20 will be
    http://i48.tinypic.com/nx5kba.jpg
    The J-8II never carried more than 6700 kilogram internal fuel, with the presumption above we got almost same thickness for both J-20 and J-8II and don’t mention inner weapon bay is set.
    http://i45.tinypic.com/16kw0p0.jpg
    Now I was recalled why somebody emphasized the wingspan of J-20 must be 14 meters. Given the length will reach 22 meters if according to same scale for the 14 meters, the 14 meter would be denied by chameleonic way from 13.01 to 14.99 meter, this is why I ask twice the interval which one never dare to reply directly.

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 7 #2350709
    emile
    Participant

    At least be sincere. You are claiming J-20 is an interceptor. You are comparing it to J-8 then saying “good luck with the tight turns etc”. Be bold, don’t be shy. 🙂 You are saying it is too long to be an air superiotry fighter. Don’t you? Am I reading wrong???? :rolleyes:

    Also, if you want you can use it as a bomber, too. That is not the point. The point is you are saying it is not designed for air superiority. Or don’t you?? 🙂

    By the way, I dint ignore any of your points, I said J-20 body is longer than F-22’s, definitely not by 20% though. Exhaust to nose length for F-22 is still longer than 17m and J-20 is shorter than 20m when you exclude tails. Difference is probably around ~2.5 meters. But you have to accept that tail structure of F-22 is much more massive than that of J-20. It is completely fair to compare their absolute lengths.

    I guess you have the impression of F-22 is a tiny jet 🙂 You know what, it is bigger and heavier than even F-4 😉 It’s empty weight is 19,7 tonnes! 5 tonnes more than an that of F-15E. 🙂 I will be bold have a wild guess here and tell you J-20 empty wight will be almost identical to that of F-22 🙂

    I will repeat myself. By looking at dimensions it is really hard and requires some talent to say “J-20 is not designed for air-superiority.”

    A good picture that shows ratios of J-20 (you can come up with your own estimates about wing span emile come on use some engineering knowledge of yours :), your welcome ):

    http://s14.postimage.org/z0wa132dt/image.png

    Does it still looks like an interceptor?? All interceptors need those canards and wing span 😉

    Tooo many opinion with no premise.

    I still have no idea about your interval of that 14 meter for wingspan

    http://s14.postimage.org/z0wa132dt/image.png
    If your eye works well please make out the photo you posted with obvious pitch angle.
    Otherwise, before you come to join this forum, please fill your brain with basic knowledge of plane. Since the first plane flew into sky, none of them was measured length by exhauster.
    What’s the merited length about this fighter by your personal rule?
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9b/Vampire_t11_wz507_g-vtii_cotswoldairshow_2010_arp.jpg/800px-Vampire_t11_wz507_g-vtii_cotswoldairshow_2010_arp.jpg

    in reply to: Will many NATO air forces be mainly obsolete by 2030? #2351431
    emile
    Participant

    With scaled volume production, expensive air fighter today’s will be affordable for many small air force in Europe. No worries.

    in reply to: 60 Years 338 Mira F-4E special tail colours #2351695
    emile
    Participant

    nice, indeed!

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 7 #2351905
    emile
    Participant

    I still have no idea about your interval of that 14 meter for wingspan

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 7 #2351940
    emile
    Participant

    This is the J-20 about 20.6meters long, filled fully by the missile in side weapon bay.

    I am so glade to see how many people will fall into this trap, most of them will be Chinese in believe.:diablo:

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 525 total)