George_nklIt seems that it’s been a while since these pictures were taken:
http://www.google.gr/imgres?q=kai+fa-50&um=1&hl=el&sa=N&rlz=1R2ADFA_enGR396&biw=1024&bih=567&tbm=isch&tbnid=n6XcGwQolTfToM:&imgrefurl=http://www.aereo.jor.br/2011/05/04/primeiro-voo-do-fa-50-da-coreia-do-sul/&docid=fSDHQT9uo-En7M&w=1148&h=697&ei=p-IuToylB8nHsgad5bED&zoom=1
George_nkl[QUOTE=Cy24driver1;1506664]
:diablo:
Nice Pics Banshee !! I wish you all the best of Happy New Year 2010 !!:diablo:
An unbelievable color pic of Syrian Hinds sporting a mottled camouflage scheme of green and light gray? to advantage !!:eek::eek::eek:
http://foto.mail.ru/mail/taijr1/_myphoto/15.html
Syrian Fishbed !!;)
http://esyria.sy/sites/images/suweda/characters/103895_2009_10_26_10_49_20.image2.jpg
Couldn’t they be Yemeni by any chance? (I mean the Hinds)
George_nklHere is what’s visible after ‘sheding some light’:
George_nkl…Probably the widow pressed charges against the Turkish pilot and now can have the moral satisfaction that he can’t enter Greece for tourism, because he will be held until the appeal.
I guess he’ll probably have a hard time travelling abroad in general.
George_nklDuring the Falklands war, another asset available to both sides, was CH-47.
George_nklI don’t understand how you can just lie without bothering to check a single fact? took me two seconds to find that the Israeli is a huge supporter of the two state solution
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/929439.html
While hamas and fatah kill each other on sight. So is there a Gaza state a west bank state? Jordan is 80% Palestinian and if Israel agree to Palestinians returning to its territory then you will have 4 Palestinian states.
The demography inside Israel is still favours the Jews by a ratio of 8:2 and since Gaza/W. Bank arabs only vote for their leaders (hamas won t he elections) I don’t see how it effects Israel?
However, at least you are not trying to sell us the story that Iran nukes are for civilian use.
Oh, you must be so smart, you can tell in two seconds, who’s lying and who tells the truth! And you can’t see how it effects Israel either? For sure someone must be very proud of you…
P.S. I’m not trying to sell anything.
George_nklI don’t understand how you can just lie without bothering to check a single fact? took me two seconds to find that the Israeli is a huge supporter of the two state solution
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/929439.html
While hamas and fatah kill each other on sight. So is there a Gaza state a west bank state? Jordan is 80% Palestinian and if Israel agree to Palestinians returning to its territory then you will have 4 Palestinian states.
The demography inside Israel is still favours the Jews by a ratio of 8:2 and since Gaza/W. Bank arabs only vote for their leaders (hamas won t he elections) I don’t see how it effects Israel?
However, at least you are not trying to sell us the story that Iran nukes are for civilian use.
Oh, you must be so smart, you can tell in two seconds, who’s lying and who tells the truth! And you can’t see how it effects Israel either? For sure someone must be very proud of you…
P.S. I’m not trying to sell anything.
George_nklIsrael is there forever. deal withit!
Yeah, Hitler too was convinced that his regime would last 1000 years!
That aside, let’s have a calm look at a few realities:
– Israel has never really endorsed the two-state solution, they’re just trying to fool the Palestinians in that regard (proved by their attitude towards the Palestinians, in the past and at present).
– The dynamics of demographics, is clearly in favour of the Palestinians. That means that after some time, as oppressed they may be, as deprived of a series of basic means, necessary to satisfy their basic human needs, and despite the scores of them being killed every once in a while, the Palestinians will once again constitute the majority population within Palestine in the near future (comprising the Palestinians in Gaza, West Bank and Israel).
– It seems most likely, that Iran’s Nuclear Program, has already reached a point of no return, thus leading to a projected nuclear capability, with all its implications (of course, it’s silly to believe that Iran would use the nuclear weapons it might acquire, as an offensive asset, rather than a deterrent).
From the above points results that, it would seem to be in Israel’s interest to deal with the Palestinian Issue now, rather than in the future, when it may find itself in a position of being obliged to accept a one-state solution, a state that would not be constitutionally jewish, as Israel is today. Thus the question arises, as to what Israel’s intentions really are, regarding that matter (the Palestinian issue). Unless they’re maybe hoping that some kind of ‘Spanish Flu’ would take care of the problem?
George_nklIsrael is there forever. deal withit!
Yeah, Hitler too was convinced that his regime would last 1000 years!
That aside, let’s have a calm look at a few realities:
– Israel has never really endorsed the two-state solution, they’re just trying to fool the Palestinians in that regard (proved by their attitude towards the Palestinians, in the past and at present).
– The dynamics of demographics, is clearly in favour of the Palestinians. That means that after some time, as oppressed they may be, as deprived of a series of basic means, necessary to satisfy their basic human needs, and despite the scores of them being killed every once in a while, the Palestinians will once again constitute the majority population within Palestine in the near future (comprising the Palestinians in Gaza, West Bank and Israel).
– It seems most likely, that Iran’s Nuclear Program, has already reached a point of no return, thus leading to a projected nuclear capability, with all its implications (of course, it’s silly to believe that Iran would use the nuclear weapons it might acquire, as an offensive asset, rather than a deterrent).
From the above points results that, it would seem to be in Israel’s interest to deal with the Palestinian Issue now, rather than in the future, when it may find itself in a position of being obliged to accept a one-state solution, a state that would not be constitutionally jewish, as Israel is today. Thus the question arises, as to what Israel’s intentions really are, regarding that matter (the Palestinian issue). Unless they’re maybe hoping that some kind of ‘Spanish Flu’ would take care of the problem?
George_nkl..Just know this that the longer Israel takes to implement the two state solution the worst it will be for them.
Not just that! This stance may lead to a point, where the two state solution will become unacceptable/inapplicable. The quick implementation of a two state solution, is Israel’s last chance to survive as a jewish state, before the unavoidable arises. Time is running out for Israel; sadly, arrogance is not a wise councilor..
George_nkl..Just know this that the longer Israel takes to implement the two state solution the worst it will be for them.
Not just that! This stance may lead to a point, where the two state solution will become unacceptable/inapplicable. The quick implementation of a two state solution, is Israel’s last chance to survive as a jewish state, before the unavoidable arises. Time is running out for Israel; sadly, arrogance is not a wise councilor..
George_nklThis is an Egyptian MiG-23, too. It has the eagle of Saladin in the middle of the flag, the old Libyan flag had a plain white stripe in the middle.
No fabe, it’s indeed libyan. As stated before, egyptian MiG-23s, had the fuselage roundel painted on the intake, while the libyan ones, under the cockpit. As far as the libyan flag is concerned, the eagle motiv has been adopted for some period, while the agreement regarding the libyan-sponsored FAR was in still in force: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federation_of_Arab_Republics
It seems that a number of libyan aircraft had been sporting the relevant marking. It’s not known however, whether any syrian airplane ever carried a similar fin flash.
By the way, the original picture showed MiG-23 712 and should’ve looked like this (a mirror image of the one posted earlier):
(Sorry Tango, it took me too long to complete this reply, so I didn’t notice that you had already covered the subject.)
George_nklThere’s no doubt that addressing this problem, amounts to an expert’s crossword to Iran’s opponents:
Obviously, a well planned and carried out strike, could have the iranian program slowed down, crippled or stalled for a while. It seems however that this program has already reached a point, that renders it irreversible; that is, it cannot be completely disbanded through force.
Thus, another aspect that needs to be taken seriously into account is following:
Assuming that Iran will sooner or later, after an attack, be in a position (technically) to resume their nuclear program, one can only expect that their determination to achieve their goals would be increased, while they would most probably declare themselves not bound anymore by their conventional obligations towards the IAEA (limitations, inspections etc), from that point on, and openly or almost openly pursue the aquisition of a nuclear weapon.
In that case, an attack, although succesfull, could lead to a precipitation of events in the medium/long term, and ultimately lead to an adverse effect.
George_nklHere is a Colombian S.Tucano:
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1150363/L
Well, they don’t really look like each other.
George_nklSince we’re talking about Somalian MiGs, does anyone have a color version of this particular photo?
Sign In
