dark light

Archer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,351 through 1,365 (of 1,614 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Todays will be a lot harder to work out chaps, good luck #1611198
    Archer
    Participant

    No. 5 is the Myasishchev VM-T Atlant. A conversion of the Myasishchev M-4 ‘Bison’ to carry large objects (Energia rocket sections I think).

    in reply to: Mystery photo… #1611260
    Archer
    Participant

    I don’t think they’re stumped James, just being too busy digging through books to reply I guess! 😀

    Anyway, all my guesses where shot down in the first few posts, so I’ll leave it to the experts now……………………………. come on….. anyone???? :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Air to Airs from slides #1611264
    Archer
    Participant

    Nice shots Corsair! May I ask, is that the late Joe H. in the T-6 with number 58?

    in reply to: Your best freeware add-on? #250953
    Archer
    Participant

    RAF oriented fleet? In that case you’ll need the Anson and Hunter from this guy as well: DG Designs, his creations can be downloaded from Avsim and Flightsim. I’ve also added another site for British airliners to my post above.

    in reply to: Your best freeware add-on? #250966
    Archer
    Participant

    undoubtably my best at the moment has got to be the Vickers package that came free with the Pc Pilot magazine, Vanguard ,Valeta,Viscount, Viscount. Excellent sounds panels and textures and a good range of animations.

    If you like those, have a look at the designer’s website for more gems: Rick Piper’s Paintshop

    Edit: might as well add this one too (more Vickers): DM Flight Sim

    in reply to: Question about Merlins #1788988
    Archer
    Participant

    I was leafing through ‘British Aero Engines’ by Alec Lumsden earlier tonight and there’s a photo in there of an early Hurricane with the hand crank installed. Also an account of the author of how he hand-cranked a Kestrel. I’m sure the early Merlins therefore used the same system. I could look it up of course but I’ve just stored that book away again and it’ll take me 10 minutes to get it again……. another time!

    in reply to: Air-racing (Reno etc) #1788990
    Archer
    Participant

    I was going to suggest that book after seeing your post on the WIX forums (I actually had it in my hand five minutes before reading your question) but I see MikeJ has done the honours! It is very American indeed, but I’m sure it’ll come in handy, and it’s a good read as well 😮

    in reply to: Dutch Catalina flies again #1791094
    Archer
    Participant

    What is the situation with a warbird registered in one country and making a trip to another for a show ?

    That’s a different question, but basically as long as you’ve got a ‘normal’ CofA (Certificate of Airworthiness) you can fly an airplane anywhere, as long as you follow local rules (equipment, procedures and such). For airshow flying each country has its own rules regarding display authorisations and such which you will need to follow.

    If you don’t have a ‘normal’ CofA then it gets complicated. The FAA ‘experimental’ category for example only allows flying over the USA within a set of rules, and if you want to go somewhere else you need to get special permissions from each country you overfly and land in. Expect more trouble if you wish to attend an airshow!

    in reply to: Dutch Catalina flies again #1792806
    Archer
    Participant

    Aah yes, I should of course point out that the above goes for a Stateside registered Cat. If you put one on another register, it is all dependent on whether the type has been registered there before, or whether the local CAA will accept the aircraft on the basis of its foreign type certification. A few years ago the Dutch CAA was totally against allowing foreign warbirds onto the Dutch register, but the Cat was actually the first to break through that barrier!

    in reply to: Dutch Catalina flies again #1793514
    Archer
    Participant

    http://www.tidetech.com/fighterfactory/catalina.html

    Formerly at North Weald until last summer

    This particular Cat seems to be able to operate with its nose turret installed, I’ve looked up why and it turns out that this airplane is certified a bit different. Basically it boils down to this: during the 50’s and 60’s a number of companies have modified Cats for use on the civil register, and from this a number of different subtypes have evolved. Some of these were conversions to carry cargo only under CAR 4a rules, others were passenger conversions under CAR 3 and CAR 4a. NC9521C was one of the latter, and is still registered in the ‘normal’ category, as opposed to many warbirds which are registered as ‘experimental’, as a type ’28-5ACF’ (see here, search for ‘9521C’ ). Now you can look up the Type Certificate Data Sheet for this type (click here ) and this explains that this is a Cat which has been modified to carry passengers and cargo by Steward-Davis Incorporated, and the best part is that this specific modification actually allows the installation of the nose turret, provided that ‘the turret revolving mechanism is removed or made inoperative and the opening between the turret and the nose are faired over’ (page 4, A (2) ). Max operating weight is restricted to 27,000 pounds but at least your Cat will look like a true military specimen this way!

    Compare the TCDS above to a few others, have a look here and type ‘PBY’ in the search box on the left.

    Edit: just to add that this trick will only work on a Cat which has previously been ‘civilised’ to a config that allows the turret to be carried. If you restore a Cat which has never gone through this process, or change it to a configuration that doesn’t fall under the limitations of the TCDS you will probably end up in the ‘experimental’ category again.

    in reply to: Dutch Catalina flies again #1793866
    Archer
    Participant

    Hmm, I hadn’t thought about the reasoning behind the lack of nose turrets yet, but JDK is on the right track I think. The nose of a Cat is pretty empty structurewise starting from the back of the instrument panel, and installing a nose turret in there means that you’re introducing a lot of options for strange airflows into the nose through and around the turret. While this just causes cold feet, bird hits in the same area might create larger problems as you might easily find a non-airworthy seagull or something similar around your feet. And then there’s a different story when we’re talking about water operations! The forces that are present when you operate the Cat from a water environment are pretty severe, as was demonstrated in the accident with Plane Sailing’s Super Cat a few years back. Introducing a fairly fragile structure like a turret in the nose severely increases the options for trouble if you ask me! Obviously because of this the CAA/FAA will not be very enthusiastic either.

    Another thing is that that Cat as a civil aircraft probably never was certified to fly with a nose turret. Only the military models had this. So there is no previous certification basis to fall back on. This means that you would have to get it certified as a change to an existing aircraft but the ‘modern’ rules would apply to that change, see above for the issues! 😉
    A very far-fetched option would be to get the aircraft certified for operations from land only (as a Multi-engine Land type instead of ME amphibian), but this probably means a completely new type certification, and also you don’t get to do the fun stuff anymore 😉

    in reply to: Browser problem to using forum? #1797537
    Archer
    Participant

    Anyone out there using Mozilla Firefox as their browser and who can tell me the trick to attaching files to a post. If I click the “Manage attachments”button nothing happens.

    If you look at the bottom right corner then a small exclamation mark thingy probably appears after clicking that button. Click once on that and you can then tell the dialog that appears to allow pop-up windows from this site. That should sort it. It is probably also accessible via ‘Tools’ – ‘Pop-up manager’ or something like that.

    in reply to: More Chailey pics #1799204
    Archer
    Participant

    Great photos! I like the one with Carolyn and ML407, gives you a nice idea of size and scale!

    in reply to: Aircraft Recce test #1801500
    Archer
    Participant

    #4 a Bonanza I think, the red one looks like a Hunter to me (#9)
    #7 could be a T-6

    Archer
    Participant

    I’ve only seen this one: replica Natter owned by a certain gentleman in Florida.

    So what’s the story on that nose section then, can we confirm it’s a Betty??

Viewing 15 posts - 1,351 through 1,365 (of 1,614 total)