I agree entirely-no way should a retired XH558 go to Duxford. IF she ever flies again, and once we’ve all enjoyed that marvelous sight and sound for the LAST time, (again) it’s fair to say that no Vulcan will probably EVER fly again. ‘558 will certainly never do so, and thus the requirement to keep her ‘alive’ will gradually slip away; all Duxford is interested in is it’s bloody American museum, and hosting the same airshow three or four times a year,every year. Yawn.
I’d be amazed if the HLF suddenly agree to fund the Vulcan, but whatever happens, if she flies again, she must NOT go ruddy Duxford afterwards!!!
😮
Like most new formats/technology, I guess that full blown, decent zoom digital cameras will gradually come down in price.
I think there will always be a place for ‘proper’ film, or at least prints of your digi images, as you try handing round your PC when you want to show off your latest offerings!
I don’t think anyone has mentioned it yet, but Kodak do a very good online service for getting prints done from a digital source-I don’t actually have a digital camera, but I often scan things in, upload them to Kodak from my PC and get them printed professionally!
Just recently, I’ve been scanning in loads of old odd-sized black and white family shots, tidying them up, and having them printed, all for little cost and for superb service and quality-all from the comfort of my PC! If you’re talking loads and load of prints it may get expensive, but it’s a very good service and I’d recommened it to anyone. Just search ‘Kodak’ in the UK and you should find it okay.
Lastly, Damien has obviously shot himself in the foot there re. the quality of his digital pictures-look, that Spitfire is double exposed, it’s got two canopies!
Well said, Ant-I think the Stirling could have been one heck of a machine, had they given her some decent wings and perhaps sorted the bomb bay out a bit.
If I remember rightly, the Stirling’s rather silly legs were the result of increasing the angle of things for take-off, weren’t they? Anyone?
RE: Hendon Bomber Hall
Peter-no, the Stirling pieces are shown on a VIDEO you can buy from the shop at Hendon. From memory, there’s a chunk of fuselage, a little bit of a wing panel, and a few other bits and bobs-certainly enough to make an interesting display in the Hall and give the old Stirling boys something to look at.
Get rid of the Vulcan?! Well, I’ll say that it doesn’t do it any visual favours having it’s nose probe about three millimetres from the corner of the building…
Arguably, if you were going to start representing individual designers with things like office recreatons, you’d be wanting to start with RJ or someone like that. Really though, it takes up a lot of space in that corner of the Hall, and seems a little pointless to me.
RE: Most and least changed
‘Unlike the Manchester…’
Well, I was talking about the Lancaster, a different type you see…and very contrary to popular misconception, Roy Chadwick-signed Avro documents still exist which prove that a ‘four engined Manchester’ was thought of/desired WAY before it actually became an operational failure-thus, the Lancaster was not strictly ‘born out of failure’ as the story always goes after all, but actually planned along. Oh well, you try and get the whole general aviation public to listen to/accept THAT one!
So to re-state my original point, the operational Lancaster airframe barely changed throughout it’s whole career.
RE: Most and least changed
Well, ignoring the specified inclusion dates completely, the Lanc barely changed in appearance for all of it’s war life-apart from that little hiccup batch with those ugly round engines on of course!
See, if you get it right on the drawing board, you don’t have to keep farting around with it afterwards…
RE: 1947 Aircraft sale……
Agreed, that particular little list is endless…
Peter, good luck with your quest, for over the moors of Binglebang, through the swamp of certain doom, past the hills of nastiness and the dales of smell, lies the lost storage shed of the Lanc spares, that fabled Holy Land we all seek…and there within, you will find the one, true Lanc spare…
Actually, I bloody hate all that ‘Lord Of The Rings’ type-stuff.
Three hours I sat there, and not one piston ring was shown!!!
RE: Trying to find an authentic antenna for……
:+ Sorry mate, couldn’t resist! But first you wanted an H2S blister, and now you want a Rebecca antenna-I just wondered if anyone could join your worthy quest, or if I had to be a Knight of the Round Table or something!!!
Good luck with your parts hunting, anyway!!!
RE: Trying to find an authentic antenna for……
Sorry mate, no, but I do have a bag of gold dust, Venus’ arms, the Golden Fleece, the Ark of The Covenant and the Holy Grail here if anyone’s interested..!
Mike
😉
RE: Lancaster S-Sugar
I would if I lived a bit nearer to it! (About 150 miles away)
RE: Lancaster S-Sugar
Of course the conservation is the most important part, and I’m glad to hear that she’s gradually going to go matt black, though I have a feeling it’ll be a LONG wait before she’s entirely repainted? I mean, that’s going to mean new codes and nose art and everything, isn’t it? What the actual plan there then David?
RE: Lancaster S-Sugar
Yay! About damned time her bum was back on terra firma, too. David, perhaps now is the time to politely suggest to the ‘powers that be’ around you there that she in fact looks a lot better as Chadwick intended!
Does your new black paint match then, or stand out like a sore thumb like that on her port side?!
MIke
RE: Spitfire Pilots Notes
Well Ian, usually reprints say as much on the bottom of the rear cover-they always used to when supplied by ‘Air SData Publications’, anyway. I don’t know who prints them these days, though they are still on sale in places like Hendon, but I’m sure any reprint would say as much.
RE: Space Shuttle Columbia Lost over Texas
I knew about the Challenger crew-at least some of them survived for some seconds after the explosion, as some of their personal emergencey air thingies were found to be switched on, something that could only be done by the individual. There are also several versions of radio transcripts going around the net that purport to be their final screams, shouts and prayers, but they hold less weight for me. Remember, Challenger itself did not explode-the tank it was sitting on did. That shuttle vehicle itself was torn apart by high-Mach aero forces, leaving the crew compartment as one fairly intact lump-which can be seen falling away in extreme close-ups of the explosion if you know where to look. Oh yes, the Challenger crew most certainly did NOT go out with one quick bang…
Columbia? How simple do you want it? The heat shielding was damaged, the shuttle burnt and lost structure, the end.