dark light

palembang

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 181 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: should India have gotten Su-35 instead? #2237510
    palembang
    Participant

    do not be scared. china will nto get su35 so no need for india to get su35 as well.
    but even su35 is not enough for india if they want to stop new advance j10 model or new 5th gen chinese aircraft.

    only thing india can do is buy more russian stealth flanker or f35.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2237515
    palembang
    Participant

    J-31 serves with J-20 in a hi lo combo and replaces J-10.

    no it is not.
    j31 is high and j20 is high.
    only difference is two different size.

    j31 was losing design by shenyang against j20 but j31 got new life as it become a naval fighter
    this is just like f16 and f18. f18 was rival of f16 and is much bigger than f16 but lost. but us navy pick up f18 and it became a navy fighter.
    also f23 and f22 were different size too.

    j31 will become the best navy fighter in the next 10 year.

    in reply to: Waging an air war in North Asia – 2025 Scenario #2237518
    palembang
    Participant

    only american want to see war between china and taiwan.
    many chinese do not want taiwan to be independent and get annoyed when they think they are not chinese
    but many chinese also wish they were living in taipei instead and have good relation with taiwanese at personal level as long as do not talk about politics.

    it is more productive if china and taiwan forces work together to destroy japan or vietnam instead.

    in reply to: Saab looks to Asia to develop new stealth fighter #2237520
    palembang
    Participant

    Why worse ? Why AMCA ? With this current economic conditions continue in Asia, I don’t think India can afford AMCA. The main design still there, but KAI just preparing fall back design. India did not, and still put a believe that they can finish a design like AMCA on their own. Like I said, under current economic condition in Asia, nobody except China can do it alone on a 5th gen twin engine design.

    korea has napoleon complex. little country trying to do too much.
    i do not see many other country the same economy size of korea trying to make the thing korea want to make.
    aircraft carrier and stealtha irplane will forever be away from their actual skill.

    korean air force know that for sure.
    korea need to learn to be obedient jr partner and work with either japanese or indian.
    problem is, india management is bad. if korea join, they may not see the fighter until 2060.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2252205
    palembang
    Participant

    no, j31 is not hilo like f16 and 15
    j31 and j20 is like f18 and f16. two different size aircraft that is competing for same job.
    j31 is loser but is now being used for carrier.

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2252259
    palembang
    Participant

    Dr Somnath999!! lolol you wish there is that many missile inside
    but really only 2 in a bay. thats it!
    but if you want you can draw 8 in a bay too.

    in reply to: Why China's air power does not seem threatening. #2252296
    palembang
    Participant

    An interesting article of PLAAF:

    http://www.airforcemag.com/MagazineArchive/Pages/2013/January%202013/0113PLAAF.aspx

    What’s especially interesting are the estimates of Chinese combat aircraft (PLAAF only):

    Modern
    J-10A: 120-200
    J-11A: 116-140
    J-11B: 18
    Su-30: 73-76
    JH-7*: 70-72
    [b]TOTAL: 399-486 (29% – 37% of fighter fleet)[/]

    *JH-7 may be new but it certainly doesn’t seem modern. Think underpowered Tornado

    Older generation
    J-7: 350-552
    J-8: 312 -360
    Q-5: 120-130
    TOTAL: 782 – 840 (63%-71% of fighter fleet

    PLANAF is in a similar position.

    In the future the number of older aircraft will be replaced with newer aircraft including 5th generation. The article estimates 1,000 4th generation by 2020.

    However, the threat posed by these is still not that great:

    – US operates over 2,000 combat aircraft all of which are either 4th generation or 5th generation.

    – US allies in North Asia (Japan/Korea/Taiwan) operate a further 800+ fourth generation aircraft as well as several hundred 3rd generation aircraft being replaced by 4th/5th generation aircraft.

    Including Vietnam and Australia, SE Asia has a further 300+ fourth generation as well as a similar number of 3rd generation aircraft (mainly in Vietnam).

    – China’s geographic and political situation means it still requires reserves of fighters for India as well as Asian borders (e.g. a conflict against Japan would still require a maintenance of reserve against Taiwan as well as Vietnam and Spratleys.

    This makes concentration of force difficult.

    – Regiments with modern aircraft are far smaller than those with older ones. A J-7 regiment has 46 aircraft whereas a Su-30 or J-10 regiments has 24-28.

    Hence it’s most likely that 800-ish old jets will be replaced by only 500 newer ones for a total fleet of 1,000-ish fighters.

    – China is extremely lacking in aerial refuellers – it’s fleet is not much bigger than Great Britains and certainly not the hundreds of aircraft deployable by USA.

    – China also doesn’t seem to have even close the number of AWACS or C3 aircraft the US has (E-2/E-3/E-6/E-8) and it’s overall capability in EW seems to be an unknown but certainly wouldn’t be at the same level of USA.

    – China is also lacking in strategic airlift – Y-20 and Il-76 help here but it’s certainly not enough to sustain longer large scale deployments.

    I think PLAAF/PLANAF is a potent force for defence of China and this capability will grow.

    However it’s ability to project power seems low and in fact it doesn’t seem to be growing much when compared to USA. US allies in Northern Asia have also kept their investments up to a degree.

    Ironically, China’s big problem seems to be lack of numbers. And that problem will not be resolved as long as the US and the northern Asians can continue to invest in defence even at moderate rates.

    lol what is your point? war is not fight in numbers alone
    500 j7 alone is more dangeorus than most air force can put in the sky.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2252299
    palembang
    Participant

    Reportedly a testbed is already flying at the CFTE !

    Recently there have been several reports about an ongoing MLU program for the PLAAF’s J-11B and the core of this is said to be a new AESA radar, which is also planned for the J-15 and J-16. Following these images a testbed is already flying with the original radar replaced. However it seems as if the section between the front canopy/windshield and the new radome is a bit larger than that found on the original Flankers, suggesting that more space was required for the electronics behind the antenna, which is then a bit smaller in diameter.
    Additional reports suggest that this version – to be called J-11D – will also include limited modifications to reduce the RCS and a maiden flight could be expected in 2014.

    it is like j7. yes we know it came from russian mig21 but the chinese made it better in every way. more mobile more agile cheaper to buy it is like mini f16.
    same with flanker. j15 is much better than su31 russian use on their carrier
    and now j11 will be better than su35 which does not even have aesa and more fuel economical engine with longer life span
    if you want best flanker you best go to china now

    in reply to: Japan Unveils new destroyer #2037909
    palembang
    Participant

    that is a carrier.
    it is as long as french carrier. if they add angle deck then it is the french carrier!!

    in reply to: Japanese stealth demonstrator undergoing strength tests #2253504
    palembang
    Participant

    And yet Russian and Japanese navies aren’t jousting over the territories ever other week like China and Japan are.
    Any new Japanese fighter is built with China in mind, not so much Russia.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/17/japanese-jets-intercept-russian-bombers-on-heels-suspected-practice-runs/

    in reply to: Japanese stealth demonstrator undergoing strength tests #2253513
    palembang
    Participant

    Yeah, Japan definitely has more problems with Russia than China.

    Rofl.

    not my fault you do not know history. japan dispute with russia over more things. go look at a map of the islands. they claim much more than they do with china.

    in reply to: Japanese stealth demonstrator undergoing strength tests #2253519
    palembang
    Participant

    Worst comment of the month award goes to….

    japan have ww2 dispute with russia. they are building such plane and carrier to fight your pakfa you know

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2253524
    palembang
    Participant

    actually j31 was shengyangs rival design to j20. so j31 is really like f22 category.
    but like f23 and f22, same competition but different size airplane.

    in reply to: Japanese stealth demonstrator undergoing strength tests #2253529
    palembang
    Participant

    why japan keep trying to rebuild its military. ww2 is over.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2262527
    palembang
    Participant

    Not really. I just get bored with the same people speculating on the same airplanes that in reality they know nothing about…

    Call me crazy I guess…

    Anyways, I find the new H-6K variant pretty interesting. On a smaller level, it reminds me a bit of what the United States has done with the B-52 over the years.

    The big question for me regarding the H-6K is the internal bay and what it might be used for. Many sources seem to think it is now used for fuel (ala F-105 and Q-5), but I’ve seen several photos with the bay open. It would be interesting to see what types of conventional weapons they could fit into that bay, and perhaps something along the lines of a small rotary launcher for Chinese JDAM equivalents is possible.

    Thoughts?

    yes bay is gone, it is now fuel. all missile is now on the wing. your photos is probably old version. maybe you saw h6h. if you look at h6k bottom picture, there is no bay door.
    but china will replace h6 line with new stealth bomber that was posted here couple month ago. it will destroy all your carrier very easily.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 181 total)