dark light

Hot_Charlie

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 613 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: so what is a Poffler then ? #1199357
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    It’s an ALBM carrier version of the VC10. For more info I would recommend getting yourself a copy, the author did a great job on it and it describes a lot of interesting variants that not many people know about.

    Get one here: Vickers VC10: AEW, Pofflers and Other Unbuilt Variants: Project Tech Profile

    Finally in stock at Amazon then.:) If you want to save on the postage you can get it direct from Chris Gibson himself for £8.95 + £1.00P&P as opposed to Amazon’s £2.75P&P from here

    in reply to: Peter Holloways Collection #1214214
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Bump!!

    The reason?:confused:

    in reply to: General Discussion #349892
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    It’s won races before.

    They’d won a race before (in Honda’s modern guise from its BAR years onwards).:D

    in reply to: FI team Brawn #1917246
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    It’s won races before.

    They’d won a race before (in Honda’s modern guise from its BAR years onwards).:D

    in reply to: Can someone help ID these ? #1223125
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    On further inspection, I think Jon might be right with the K-Class.:)

    in reply to: High – Low – High #1223253
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    I suspect it’s talking about some basic sort of mission profile; a high level transit, dropping in to low level to attack a simulated target, then RTB at high level (still part of the Tucano syllabus today).:)

    Looking at yesterday’s thread, relating to fatigue, any sortie involving low level will have a higher fatigue usage than (for example here) the same route flown at several thousand feet, and IIRC will be recorded as such in the F700.

    in reply to: Can someone help ID these ? #1223258
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Looks like it – by the look of THIS photo.

    An N-Class blimp, I reckon.:)

    in reply to: RAFM, faded glory ? #1160530
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Regarding the last remaining airworthy Belfast, I once had the idea for the RAF Tranport Museum located near Brize Norton to house:

    1 Belfast (last airworthy example) FLOWN IN
    2 VC10 (original No.10 Squadron example) FLOWN IN
    3 Tristar FLOWN IN
    4 Britannia (Kemble)
    5 Comet (Lynham)
    6 DC3 (Lynham)
    7 C130 (Lynham) FLOWN IN
    8 Andover (Former QF – currently located in Africa) FLOWN IN
    9 DH4a (replica)
    10 Devon
    11 Twin Pioneer (Coventry Spare)
    12 Pembroke
    13 Whirlwind
    14 Sycamore

    All contained in a 300ft x 300ft ASDA/Tesco style shed and run by volunteers (from Brize Norton). Not actually built on MoD land because there isn’t the room and the paper work involved (Whitehall) would be a nightmare.

    Nice bit of land just north of the airfield across the road, reasonably easy access from the M40/A34/A40. They could even build a Waddington style viewing enclosure. It’d never catch on though.

    A VC10 will preserved at Cosford, but I’ve no idea if it’ll be an original C1K, or war veteran AAR K3 (I susepct the former, and the recent FlyPast article strongly implied there will only be one RAF VC10 preserved, which is a shame). A new collection would allow the preservation of both.

    Off course nothing will happen. Nothing ever does. The Comet (if it isn’t scrapped) will probably go to the DH Heritage Centre, while the DC3 will be moved to BN. The Belfast will probably remain in OZ when she is retired. The other aircraft are available apart from the Britannia, which might one day find shelter in one of Kemble’s hangars.

    Sadly very true.

    in reply to: RAFM, faded glory ? #1160823
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Haven’t been to Hendon for some years. The Bev was still in situ and there was a good feel to the place although a little antiseptic.

    The meandering display policy has always been a puzzle to me, particularly the Milestones hall. Not sure if the Development Eurofighter DA2 has replaced the 1:1 model. Surely that particular airframe should be with the R&D Collection at Cosford along with the EH101.

    It possibly should, but it has more RAF relevance to that building than some of the other aeroplanes in it, and a bit of milestones relevance. I suspect that maybe one day it will be replaced with an operational Typhoon airframe – much as the pre-production Tornado Gr1 was at Hendon before being replaced and sent to Cosford. As for the Merlin, I suspect in due course an operationally tired veteran will be found to replace the development airframe.

    That would be logical anyway…:o;)

    in reply to: RAFM, faded glory ? #1161111
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Oh dear , I was so looking forward to my first visit next month , I have 9 days in the UK . Hendon , Bruntingthorpe , Duxford , Old Warden , and some rellies wedding in Cumbria .

    What I will say is don’t let this thread put you off. If you haven’t been before, and/or are visiting from abroad, it is still worth visiting for the aircraft on show. What I would advise is checking on the opening times of the various hangars during the day you intend to visit, or make it an all day visit. 🙂

    in reply to: RAFM, faded glory ? #1161207
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    pardon?!

    Ok, not quite 50%, but time it badly and you could easily find yourself unable to access either the GW hangar, or the the BoB hall (and even if you do there’s a fair chance the top gallery and/or Sunderland will be closed). The main exhibition hangars I’ve never found closed, but again, on all but one of my most recent visits the upper galleries in there were also closed (a particular shame as that area deals with some of the more personal stories, with the VC exhibit etc).

    My last visit I was pleasantly surprised. Everywhere except the Sunderland was open (although partially due to ensuring that I’d arrive so that my visit coincided with the opening times of the GW hangar and the BoB hall.

    Someone else mentioned they would no longer pay if it were to revert to a chargeable entry status.

    I should’ve phrased my statement better. I was implying that the general everyday visitor would be less willing to part with their hard earned cash. One of the perks before the free entry was introduced was free entry for serving personnel (another perk lost! 😉 :D).

    Pagen mentioned Yeovilton. That is a different case as it is not a National Museum.

    That was my thought, until I went to the FAAM website:

    “The National Museum of the Royal Navy

    The Fleet Air Arm Museum is one element of the National Museum of the Royal Navy, the other members are the Royal Marines Museum, Royal Naval Museum, HMS Victory and the Submarine Museum.”

    in reply to: RAFM, faded glory ? #1161227
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    I’d say so – and I’m with you on a fee as well, without “seeing the books” and of course being totally unqualified to comment !:diablo:

    No one would pay to get in nowadays though seeing as there’s a fair chance 50% of the museum will be closed. Catch 22!

    in reply to: RAFM, faded glory ? #1161275
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Would it be fair to say that the decrease in opening times and repeated closure of sections of the museum has really only become a factor since free admission was introduced?

    Time to start charging an entry fee again IMHO.

    in reply to: RAFM, faded glory ? #1161291
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Dismantle EVERYTHING and make a new museum in the center of London – enlarged to take in civil airliners (Heathrow’s Concorde and Duxford’s VC10, etc). 😀 :diablo:

    Why move Duxford’s VC10? More will be “available” (or should be) in the not too distant future.:)

    [dream on] Maybe they should shut Hendon, and move to Bicester, establishing a living history museum and preserving that complete site, rather than the historic, but now entirely encroached on by modern London site at Hendon. Use the hangarage there and technical site there, and build new space outside the confines of the 1930s site.[/dream off]

    Either way, with the fact that some time in the future there will be several new airframes requiring a home, maybe it’s time for a new site? With the impending retirement of aircraft such as the C130K, the VC10, and the state of the Comet on the gate at Lyneham, maybe it’s time for a Museum of RAF Air Transport at a suitable location.

    in reply to: Hurricane incident at North Weald #1167698
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Well, I left a comment correcting them on the amount of presently airworthy Hurricanes, using of course Mark V’s list!

    Cheers

    Paul

    Of course, being pre-moderated, no chance of them being published. I’m sure they’re having fun sifting through comments provoked by a lack of the ability to do a 30 second search on google!

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 613 total)