dark light

MiG_Master

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 127 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: FC-1 Prot. 04: Divertless Supersonic Inlet #2640574
    MiG_Master
    Participant

    Hi, My take is that..its completely wrong to make it Thunder Vs F-16..Fighting Falcon win Hands Down, F-16s are used as a yardstick, its fine to me they put DSI in to save wait and performance..cause thunder is Underpowered, But For AirForce like PAF its dream coming true..A Plane without sanctions -Home Built!

    If you Kindly look at the way PAF going about Buying..if Thunder is sooo Good! why Buy F-16s Then..Thunder is Made to be Supporting such Aircraft like F-16s not replacing them..my best Guess.. a Late Model J-10s Coming Back to topic..as said DSI improves Subsonic level as well..so what plus points it brings to Thunder..less weight T/W ratio up..for engine of 18000Ibs Max Class..??? is it going to level out performance parameters?

    ?

    in reply to: PAF news & discussion: May 2005 #2651546
    MiG_Master
    Participant

    Mohd. Ali,
    I was Searching for how Many F-7s PAF Bought in Which Year..First 24 F-7M/FT-7M 20/4 were recieved in 1989-90, second batch recieved in 1994-95 72 F-7P/FT-7P 60/12 thats about it i was not able to find any other Order Except of 55+ F-7PG/FT-7PGs..Do have more info?

    in reply to: PAF news & discussion: May 2005 #2651708
    MiG_Master
    Participant

    Hi,
    Guys, I was Following F-7s Serial Numbers 501 onwards..has anybody have any pic of Above 574? reason is as reported PAF operated 115 F-7P/FT-7P 100/15 but i was able to find picture uptil 574? Can Anybody Help?

    in reply to: PAF news and speculation #2605387
    MiG_Master
    Participant

    Hi,
    Last Night this was on News Channel (GEO TV) Pakistan is Recieving 40 Airlaunched Harpoons & 20 Ship Launched Versions of Harpoon. Plus there was news about JF-17s and can anyone confirm AVM Said PAF requirment in of 150 and PLA requirment is 250 I am Preety Sure this was said. 04 Aircraft will Join PAF in winter 2006 and other 04 Aircraft in Mid 2007.

    This what I saw & Heard on TV Channel can anyone Confirm!

    in reply to: IAI Kfir History #2605900
    MiG_Master
    Participant

    Hi,
    What kind of J-79 version did (J-79GE07/11/19 or else?)

    1. Kfir C1/C1+ please tell me in Max/min in Ibs
    2. Kfir C2/TC2 ‘” “” “”
    3. Kfir C7/TC7 ” ” ” “””
    4. Kfir CE/TCE ” ” “” “”

    in reply to: PAF news and speculation #2612494
    MiG_Master
    Participant

    Hi,
    Bhai Log, why it isn`t possible that FC-1(Chinese Version) be equipped with RD-93/WS-13 and PAF Version(JF-17 Thunder) equipped with western engine? just need a reason? any one seen any photo of 4th prototype?

    Or all this engine issue is not the engine it self that is RD-93s..could it be that advertised performance parameters are not achieved! is it the problem??

    it certainly wont make sense to start a factory where its main product has engine supply problem!!!

    too confusing!

    in reply to: PAF news and speculation #2613258
    MiG_Master
    Participant

    Hi,
    Why we are stuck with RD-93s ..it could be so that last prototype has diffrent engine.? it realy doesn`t make sense of starting a Production facility if there is no engine..may be Pakistani Version is employing a diffrent Engine…Chinese employing RD-93 ..that could be the reason of buying 100 RD-93s..( 150 FC-1 commitment ?)

    there was a talk about some modifictaion in new prototype..changes in intake..it could be a diffrent engine..now let see ..how many engines are in market of RD-93 Class..

    May be answer lies there?

    in reply to: Pakistan inaugurates JF-17 factory #2621621
    MiG_Master
    Participant

    Hi,
    Mavaustin, I guess you realy dont think or read..i wasn`t predicting 24 F-16s thats a Fact as widly reported ( in so many articles since)..second i wasn`t Predicting 4th generation requirement of 80 Aircraft.. Its was said by ACM of PAF in (Flight international Issue) was he Predicting? and was i predicting 150+ JF-17s Commitment by PAF .. u know what i was talking about! ..any many other people in the forum.

    In face of numerous attacks on me in your blind Arrogance and Hatered i can`t resist complaining..please try to think first and write then…that is why Much Esteemed PAKDEF banned me..all i did was pointed out some daydreams bang! i am a traitor or some indian!

    My Point is if PAF going to buy 100+ F-16s she would not have commited to JF-17s Production lines as well as look for 4th generation Fighter so if qouted 24 F-16s are fitting right as they still looking for 4th generation Fighters plus i must try put it in you brain that PAF cant operate more then 400 Fighters her bases and her infrastucture Prohibits that Late PAF Air Marshall qouted 80 high Tech with 160 med Tech and 160 low tech..( now are you Mr. Mavaustin In Position to make claims?)

    Sheesh! i never wanted to but i had too..

    Syed Shais Ali

    in reply to: Pakistan inaugurates JF-17 factory #2622600
    MiG_Master
    Participant

    Hi,
    so i belive that widly qouted 24 figure is correct..if PAF to go for more then 24 New F-16s that nullify 4th generation option which could be high as 80 aircraft. planned 150+ JF-17s would fit in nicely..

    any views?

    Cheers

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force (News/photos/discussions) #2625981
    MiG_Master
    Participant

    Hi,
    But if PAF looking at these F-16s as interm buy(which i belive is not true) then why they are buying Block 50s or may be 60s?? interm buy would have being simple F-16A/Bs Block 15OCUs easily operatable as PAF already operate them to make up the numbers..if more MLUed them..Now as said by Pres. Musharaf himself on TV (I heared it myself) they will be New C & Ds, which makes whole 4th Gen argument irrelevent..PAF top line i guess will be based of F-16s ( I hoped that it should have something much newer in Shape of Typhoon or Rafale but pundits think otherwise)

    One more question Comes along is there going to attirtion replacemnts of old F-16s?

    Cheers

    Syed Shais Ali

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force (News/photos/discussions) #2626030
    MiG_Master
    Participant

    Hi,
    I have read in Flight International issue some time back that PAF wants a force with 80 Top Nocth Fighters with Around 160 Medium Technology and around 160 short Range Inteceptors..thats Makes around 400 Fighters ..if we take a through history of PAF she never exceeded 400 (Fighter Aircraft) mark that what explains 160 JF-17s Commitment as Medium Tech Fighter

    as mentioned above those Figures of +-70 are correct but these include 32 F-16A/Bs soon to be MLUed or Block 20s so its purely my guess that any given order of F-16C/Ds be it Block 50plus..or else..wil be 48 enough to raise 2 more Squadrons.

    so with 48 New F-16s plus Upgraded 32 F-16A/Bs will fulfilled 80 Aircraft Requirement, other 160 would be JF-17s..

    Cheers

    Syed Shais Ali

    in reply to: PAF News and Discussion #2629345
    MiG_Master
    Participant

    Austin.
    I guess you have attacked me quite alot here and ACIG..now..as you can see we arte getting them and are those secret numbers you are talking about which are between 8 & 16..total 24 Aircraft.

    I guess..atlast i have cleared myself…

    Cheers

    Syed Shais Ali

    PS: By the way for those thinking of Block 52 & 60..not possible..they will be Only Block 15OCU as PAF Fleet Simple

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 6 #2648203
    MiG_Master
    Participant

    Hi,
    @ Showtime100..
    Thats a Cluster Bomb..looks quite like British one..

    in reply to: soviet 5x MiG-23 vs 2x F-16 1980s #2653683
    MiG_Master
    Participant

    Hi,
    I guess the supposed scenario already happend..over Pak-Afghan Border..and they were 8 x MiG-23s although 04 of them were Air to Air Tasked..against 02 F-16As..that was 80s, it didn`t get down well over Soviet Side.. 02 of them got damage in which one crashed on runway..& that was a Slashing Attack..i guess if MiG-23 stayed to fight more closer ranges ..they were dead …

    Cheers

    in reply to: Israeli Air Force Splash Two Syrian MIGS #2655567
    MiG_Master
    Participant

    Hi,
    I guess…ACIG has it for about year or so more see it your self the article is there,,but as per acig F-15s were the plane that shot down Syrian MiG-29s..

    http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_437.shtml

    Check the date ..30-Sep-2003

    Cheers

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 127 total)