I think it worth noting that as English Heritage have completed their thematic study into aerodrome structures, it is now unlikely that any additional building will be granted listed status, unless the owner openly consents to their building/s be given statutory protection.
As I wrote in a previous message, Most planners, civil servants and politicians are of the opinion that the “Thematic Study into Military Aviation Sites and Structures” and its recommendations was fully comprehensive in its nature – leaving no stone unturned. Most assume (wrongly) that if an aerodrome or structure wasn’t on your list of recommendations then it wasn’t important enough to be saved from being redeveloped (demolished).
English Heritage’s thematic study, while protecting a number of key buildings, is also being used to block additional work that needs to be done. Both the Government (local and central) and English Heritage can and have used this thematic study to “prove” their commitment to our aerodrome heritage, but NOT beyond what has already been done. Yet, there are scores of important buildings that were omitted, while desperate individuals (like myself) who are trying to save our local aeronautical heritage, need the support that only statutory protection will provide.
Regarding Northolt, it’s probably too late. I was aware (four years ago) that recommendations made to grant listed status on a number of buildings on the site were blocked by the MoD. I was also aware that Defence Estates were conducting a Core Site review of MoD accommodation in the London area, which resulted in the MoD Estate London Project (MoDEL).
I think it unlikely that English Heritage can be convinced to undertake a second review of aerodrome architecture, resulting in additional buildings being recommended for statutory protection. We are effectively on our own on this one. If there is a building that you feel needs protecting, good luck.
I have also been told that the hangars at Leconfield are to be demolished.
Sign In
