She would have made an excellent artificial reef somewhere, like the USS Oriskany :O(…
She would have made an excellent artificial reef somewhere, like the USS Oriskany :O(…
You’re lucky.
My uncle was best mates with HMS Glorious, and he ended up being badly let down. It all ended swimmingly.
HMS Glorious didn’t let your uncle down, it was the Scharnhorst that did the dirty on him and his ship. When HMS Glorious was sunk she was still a good ship.
Handley Page Halifax BIII – only need £12m or thereabouts…
Handley Page Halifax BIII – only need £12m or thereabouts…
Oh let’s not upset the Americans and at the same time let’s do give the BNP and other racist nutters ammunition and/or something to moan about. I would rather they omit the dog’s name than change it.
The problem is that the dog and his name was a prominent feature of the original film, and the producers of the remake feel they have to follow suit. The dog was a pet and nothing else. He was in the background. What’s wrong with “Here boy!” Instead of “Hello N*****”. And the codeword used to signify the breaching of the dam was sent in morse-code.
And wasn’t it Stephen Fry who kept going on about restrictive practices and pandering to the bland – having to “comply” to the mediocre in broadcasting. Well done Mr Fry – YOU’VE SOLD OUT…
And what’s worse than selling out? Perhaps profiting from negative publicity that will be generated from this idiotic decision. Fry, you Numpty!!!
Over a year ago I contacted the MoD regarding the fate of Comet XK699. I also contacted the RAFM. I expressed my concerns that the aircraft should be saved, even if the funds were not available to restore her. I wrote numerous letters – banging the drum, suggesting that she should be stored long-term if needed!
Late last year I received a phone call from a senior officer in the RAF involved in the fate of XK699. He confirmed that the aircraft was to be saved – before the end of the financial year, but he also asked me to keep this under my hat!
Well, we are now in the new FY so what happened? Good news! I received the following from BZN-FHQ A4-ENG-TAC-SO3:
“I can confirm that a decision was made at a very senior level in 2010 that the Comet XK699, is to be preserved. Due to the usual “red tape” this was not achieved within the last financial year, but is planned to go ahead this FY instead. The aircraft will be moved to RAF Shawbury for storage until the RAFM can take it. It will then be moved to the RAFM where it will be restored.
“Another officer from RAF Lyneham has now taken control of this, so I don’t yet know the timeframes involved in the move, but I should find out next week and can let you know if you wish.”
Credit does go to those in the RAF and RAFM who went that extra mile. She will probably be stored for several years before moving to Cosford, but she is safe! Some good news then!
ADDITIONAL I wonder if XK699’s future was secured largely due to the new management at Hendon?
This from the National Historic Ships site…
http://www.nationalhistoricships.org.uk/news.php/205/english-heritage-launches-industrial-heritage-at-risk-researchWhat factories, airport terminals, control towers do you consider to be at risk?
It matters not what you consider at risk! IF your favourite structure doesn’t already impress English Heritage (and they’re usually not interested in what you think) then you’re on your own.
We need a system that protects those buildings that WE consider important and not that just ticks all the right boxes for some academic. We also need enthusiasts who haven’t already written off what needs to be saved. If you don’t have fellow enthusiasts on your side then forget it.
I would like EH to introduce Grade III Listed Status, which would protect a building from being demolished, but would give the developer more leeway. There is no lottery money for restoring aerodrome buildings, so any sympathetic redevelopment has to be financially viable (profitable), and restoring a building with listed status is rarely profitable, unless the builder is given more leeway.
Not meant to be a stupid question but, given that ground to air radio/WT was in its infancy, what was a watch office used for in 1915?
Growing Tomatoes 🙂
Phillip,
Several of the buildings are listed On the factory side, New Filton House – the 1935 Art Deco office block which has been derelict for many years but currently covered in scaffolding – is listed, and I believe the massive three-bay hangar built for Brabazon assembly in the late 40s is also listed. On the northside, I think two WW1 RAF buildings are listed including the Belfast hangar.Andy
Some good news, I’m really happy for you!
…Eh? Why?!
I’ve always found the Comet at it’s best when left in highly polished bare-metal state! I understand that the Comet at Lyneham is to be moved and will ultimately end up at Cosford! I doubt if the RAFM will display two examples on the same site.
Here’s a thought: Move the proposed Battle of Britain Beacon from Hendon to central London, and at the base add another structure to house the Concorde and perhaps the Cosford Comet (polished bare metal). The RAFM would secure additional income (and publicity for Hendon) from a centrally located attraction, and two of this country’s finest civil aircraft would be better preserved being under cover.
Then again, land prices in Central London would be astronomical, but the footprint would be small…
…Just a Suggestion!
This isn’t a Spitfire, rather it is a Seafire (notice the hook). Taken from Wikipedia: After trials of Rocket Assisted Take Off Gear or RATOG apparatus (small rocket engines which could be attached to the fuselage or wings of aircraft to help shorten the take-off run) in February 1943, this equipment became a standard fitting available for all Seafires.
For more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermarine_Seafire and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assisted_take_off#JATO_and_RATO
I like the idea of someone designing a fuselage and hitting the PRINT button!
Maybe the technology is spot on, but the choice of material needs to be refined. I understand the “resolution” is around 0.1mm which is quite rough, but as with all technologies this should improve. Gone the days when you employed hundreds of metal bashers to make a fuselage or set of wings. I just hope we don’t give this technology away or make it impossible for other companies to employ this game-changing technology.
I like the idea of someone designing a fuselage and hitting the PRINT button!
Maybe the technology is spot on, but the choice of material needs to be refined. I understand the “resolution” is around 0.1mm which is quite rough, but as with all technologies this should improve. Gone the days when you employed hundreds of metal bashers to make a fuselage or set of wings. I just hope we don’t give this technology away or make it impossible for other companies to employ this game-changing technology.