dark light

Meat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 245 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Meat
    Participant

    again the ignorants puritans nationalists that love to say “everbody try to copy us” tss…

    If you genuinely and honestly believe that Russian engineers have never directly copied American aircraft designs, then you need only look in the mirror to see the ignorant person here.

    Meat
    Participant

    Creating a carbon copy F-22 would be a waste

    From the artist conceptions, that’s precisely what they’re doing. Not that it’s a surprise of course…that’s a Russian tradition going back to the Tu-4 at least. Funny how those “inferior American designs” seem so attractive to Russian engineers. 😀

    Meat
    Participant

    Yeah, considering the western next gen stealthy aircraft are not much more than prototypes themselves

    So, exactly how many “prototypes” are based at Tyndall and Langley now?

    Meat
    Participant

    Its been the best for 15yrs :0 and its only now that western fighters are moving ahead.

    Don’t be greedy, friend, share whatever it is you’re smoking with the rest of us.

    in reply to: Fun With Google Earth #2609941
    Meat
    Participant

    If you look at Nellis AFB near Las Vegas, Nevada, you’ll see some Israeli F-15’s, German Tornados, F-111, F-15, F-16, A-10, B-1, etc. To have F-111’s that image must be several years old.

    Not necessarily – the Aussies bring their -111s to Red Flag on a fairly regular basis.

    in reply to: Fun With Google Earth #2610180
    Meat
    Participant

    Here is a B-1B parked behind an F-111 at Hill AFB, Utah, along with a sprinkling of F-16s and A-10s.

    in reply to: Fun With Google Earth #2610571
    Meat
    Participant

    One thing I’ve noticed is sometimes the Google Earth imagry is a bit too low res to make stuff out

    I think some locations are better than others on Google Earth. For example, looking at my city of San Antonio, if you zoom in to “lower” than 3,000 ft altitude (look at the gauge on the lower right), it becomes blurry. But head up to Austin, and it’s crystal clear down to about 1,500 feet.

    in reply to: The Questions Thread #2610582
    Meat
    Participant

    Maybe a data base with general specifications. (i.e. Thrust, Dim, Weights, RCS, turn rates, G’s, etc. etc.) Of course all sources would need to be published. 😎

    And remember not to make any reference to statements by the aircraft’s designers, pilots, or other such “unreliable sources,” so as to avoid upsetting Over G. :diablo:

    in reply to: The Questions Thread #2610588
    Meat
    Participant

    The Apache is the only one I can think of, even though it’s a helicopter. I doubt that’d be feasible for a fast jet.

    Cobra as well. There was, I believe, a concept called King Cobra a while back that reversed the positions, but since the Cobra’s inception in Vietnam the pilot always sat in back.

    in reply to: Why no sequence of Top Gun? #2611075
    Meat
    Participant

    The IMAX film “Fighter Pilot ” is about as good an aircraft movie as I’ve ever seen.

    I really enjoyed it as well, but it could have been so much better. It really bothered me that they stuck some CGI scenes in there. I don’t mean the computer simulations, or ACMI sequences, I’m talking about CGI aircraft that the film makers tried to pass off as real. I also didn’t care for the cheap pyro effects they used for some of the strafing runs against the armored columns. It just seems to me that (since Boeing was backing the movie) they shouldn’t have had to resort to such shortcuts.

    Even having said that, though, it was still a lot of fun, and really good.

    in reply to: What right has the US got… #2611588
    Meat
    Participant

    the above is not a tribute or complement to US, it is a statement to present them as bullies.

    Bullies, eh? -sigh- Whatever you wish to believe, friend.

    in reply to: Blackbird vulnerability #2611617
    Meat
    Participant

    I’m planning a trip around the country to photograph all of the Blackbirds on display.

    Be sure you make it down here to San Antonio. 61-07979 is on display at Lackland.

    in reply to: Blackbird vulnerability #2611629
    Meat
    Participant

    Lockheed added chines to reduce RCS. That is a stone cold fact. Why you are having trouble with this is beyond me. Why is your observation, made almost 60 years after the plane was designed, more credible than the statements of Ben Rich and Kelly Johnson?

    Because he (Over G) really, really, really wants it to be. And he figures if he says it loud enough, often enough, and frantically enough, it will become true. Research, data, facts, even the statements of the people who actually designed and built the aircraft; they are all irrelevant if they don’t suit his predetermined opinion.

    in reply to: What right has the US got… #2611661
    Meat
    Participant

    usa pilots are told not to engage su-27/30/ at all costs dragline

    Where did you hear/read that? And Venik’s site doesn’t count.

    in reply to: Blackbird vulnerability #2612803
    Meat
    Participant

    and the link is crap…belenko,belenko,belenko.. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

    So let me get this straight – you not only know more about the Blackbird than those who designed it, you also know more about the Foxbat than a pilot who flew it.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 245 total)