dark light

DazDaMan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 20,596 through 20,610 (of 20,613 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Getting to fly WW2 aircraft #2096314
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Stoopid, innit??

    Mind you, Connie Edwards has had MH415 sat in a hangar for the best part of maybe 30 years – she was airworthy when he bought her (after the Battle of Britain movie), he flew her for a few years, then decided to hangar her – she’s never left the ground since!

    And the guy that had MJ772 (forget his name now) had her in his museum for years without flying her 🙁

    I think Historic Flying do this so that there are less accidents – the owners (Ed Russell, for instance) are trained up by Charlie Brown to the highest possible standards before even TOUCHING their Spitfire!

    That’s the way it should be.

    in reply to: Fatal Spitfire crash restorations #2096450
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    So does anyone know anything about the Mk1 P9374? IT’s a little off-topic, but I felt it was a bit relevant.

    I’m sure I read somewhere that the project had stalled due to “lack of interest”, but not sure where.

    in reply to: Getting to fly WW2 aircraft #2096578
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Perhaps not quite the same thing (or maybe it is)…

    Historic Flying Ltd offer a full training package with the Spitfires they restore and sell – I think it is their intention that an owner should also FLY his/her Spitfire.

    in reply to: Cuban Sea Fury #2096662
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    That’s the one, the numbers on the fuselage and tail match up, although the boss’s photo shows the plane in a sort of light blue/dark green camouflage like the colours Spitfire PT462 carried when owned by Charles Church! Repainted, I imagine.

    Cheers for that.

    in reply to: Fatal Spitfire crash restorations #2096681
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Tim Wallis’ Spitfire XIV…

    …was NH799, restored by Historic Flying (I think).

    Funnily enough, a French Spitfire website lists this aircraft as being “destroyed”, yet all other accounts I’ve read say she was “badly damaged” in the take-off accident in ’96.

    in reply to: Cuban Sea Fury #2096684
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    TWO Cuban Furies?

    Thanks for that pic. I had a look at the boss’s one, and the fuselage number is 541 (plus, it’s outdoors, behind a large tank).

    Could there be two? I didn’t even know the Cubans had Sea Furies!

    in reply to: Cuban Sea Fury #2096886
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Jeez, that wasn’t half quick! I just saw the photo a minute ago, and put the thread up 30 seconds ago! 😉

    in reply to: Hypothetically #2096988
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Woah, good one dude!

    I’d like to have something along the lines of a very big finale, something akin to Flying Legends, but instead of just a big flypast, something with a bit more flair and spectacle. The most impressive thing I ever saw was at the Museum of Flight, East Fortune, Airshow in 1998 – Spitfire IX MH434 and Hispano Buchon G-BOML dogfighting. Like that – but BIGGER!!!!! 🙂

    Why not make it at North Weald?

    in reply to: Fatal Spitfire crash restorations #2097000
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Willow – So long as the restorer has the deceased’s family’s approval, I don’t see why not.

    As long as it is handled sensitively, I can see no harm in it. I was actually approached (following a posting on the Flyvintage.com page) to see if I was interested in acquiring a Spitfire wreck (I believe it was TE566), and remember being a bit shocked at first, and politely declined (couldn’t afford it anyway!), but then I thought, well, if someone wants to do it, they should, not only to keep history going, but the family of the previous owner might want to keep the memory of their loved ones alive, too.

    It’s not entirely the same, but Carolyn Grace kept her Spitfire after Nick died – very brave of her, I think. Probably most others would have sold it.

    I seem to recall a photo of the Church Spitfire VC post-crash (a bit insensitive, I reckon), and all that remained was the tail and the wings.

    in reply to: RAF Fighters, June 1940 #2097061
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Interesting to read about the Richey/Robinson debacle – something I’d never heard of. I myself have both books but have never noticed anything similar about them in any way, shape or form. In fact, I read “Fighter Pilot” not that long ago, and “Piece of Cake” not long after, and didn’t see it. Oh well…

    I shall have a look-see at Fighter Pilot to see what info I can glean from it.

    Might just “have” to watch “Piece of Cake” on video, too, if only for the scene where Hoof Proudfoot rolls Spitfire IA AR213 over the cliffs – awesome! 🙂

    in reply to: RAF Fighters, June 1940 #2097433
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    I’ve read Piece of Cake at least SIX times since buying the book a few years ago – has to be the best 1940-era novel written, but then that’s only my opinion! The TV series was amazing, too. Must go out and buy a new copy of the book – my old one’s a bit battered!

    Wasn’t quite sure what a ‘real’ squadron would have actually done, but I took a guess that some might have been reformed and sent north, and others sent on leave. Decisions, decisions…!

    Thanks for the links and info, too. If anyone can think of anything else, feel free to add it to the mix.

    in reply to: Happy Birthday TomW – 57 OTU Pix #2097627
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    AR213 – 57 OTU etc

    Nice photos – I love to see the old black and white ones, they’re just so nice to look at, especially seeing the Spitfires as they were then!

    I’ve built a model of AR213 in her 57 OTU markings, although with it being 1/72 scale, and the markings handpainted (though not too rough) it doesn’t look too impressive.

    Much more impressive is my 1/24th AR213 in her 609 Squadron guise, between whose undercarriage the 57 OTU version sits! I’m currently finishing off a 1/10scale flying version (fun-scale) in the familiar 609 Sqdn markings.

    Any idea when AR213 might be flying again? She’s got to be my favourite Spit, as I’d seen her many times at the old Blue Max Movie Museum at Booker, and last time (1996) had a very entertaining tour around the museum AND curtained off restoration department – which WASN’T on the actual tour!

    in reply to: A new Spit for Duxford?! #2097849
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Surely it would have been at least rumoured on the flyvintage.com website? This lists most (if not all) comings and goings at Duxford, as well as a brief overview of warbird news from around the world (used to be http://www.duxford.org, I think).

    The guy who runs it, Ben Rodgers, seems to have his finger on the pulse as far as all thigns Duxford are concerned – and there’s been no mention to date.

    🙁

    in reply to: A new Spit for Duxford?! #2097852
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Surely it would have been at least rumoured on the flyvintage.com website? This lists most (if not all) comings and goings at Duxford, as well as a brief overview of warbird news from around the world (used to be http://www.duxford.org, I think).

    The guy who runs it, Ben Rodgers, seems to have his finger on the pulse as far as all thigns Duxford are concerned – and there’s been no mention to date.

    🙁

    in reply to: A treat for Spitfire fanatics #2097909
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    IAF Spitfire restoration

    Sounds like a partial replica – any pics?

Viewing 15 posts - 20,596 through 20,610 (of 20,613 total)