dark light

DazDaMan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 20,613 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hurricane For Sale #1124384
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    No, the reference was to the infamous Indian Messerschmitt 109, and also referring to the supposed plan to swap one of the BBMF Hurricanes for an ex-Indian restoration project.

    in reply to: identification help – mystery Dutch fighter #1123428
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    If only joglo could see that photo :D,we could talk about somebody having copied the wing design etc for a few weeks 😀
    If you dont know what I mean and you have a few spare hours…have a look through this thread…way off topic from post 2 …a real hoot 😀

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=86503&highlight=spitfire+copied+heinkel

    Oh God, no! I had sleepless nights for, ooh, minutes! :diablo:

    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Mosquito Squadron perhaps?

    Interestingly, the IMDB doesn’t list Mahaddie on the credits, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he wasn’t involved in its production somehow….

    in reply to: Gazelle used in Die Hard 3 #1122748
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    That’s the one. I can’t recall if it has a registration on it anywhere (even though it could well be a phoney one).

    in reply to: TWO 'Butcher Birds' on the British airshow circuit? #1122827
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Here’s one….
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/herefordandworcester/content/images/2007/06/07/war_fw190_406x304.jpg

    😉

    DazDaMan
    Participant

    According to the IMDB, it was Dennis David and Allan Wheeler again who acted as technical advisors, with the likes of Tony Bianchi and Neil Williams flying the WW1 aircraft…

    in reply to: westland whirlwind fighter in black paint #1119148
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    I have some pictures of a (the ?) prototype Whirlwind L6844 which the caption says is “painted in dark grey primer with a gloss varnish”.

    Its also unarmed but with fairings in the nose for the cannon. Its not dated but it could explain the sighting in part?

    The first prototype (L6844) flew on 11 October 1938 with further Service Trials carried out at Martlesham Heath.

    I suppose the actual radar workings would still be fairly secret in 1941, but like I say the Wiki article only has the one aircraft, a prototype at that, being tested as a night-fighter.

    in reply to: westland whirlwind fighter in black paint #1119187
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    I don’t know about the accuracy of Wikipedia, but it makes no mention of an actual “night-fighter” Whirlwind, only one was tested as such.

    The Beaufighter, however, was active as a night-fighter in that time…

    in reply to: What did you do on your 21st birthday #1118280
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Went to the pub, drank some beer, ate some Chinese.

    in reply to: What did you do on your 21st birthday #1118122
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Blimey…..what did they taste like? Bet it spoilt their day somewhat.

    Tasted like chicken! 😉

    in reply to: Alpine Fighters Hurri to be auctioned in Oz!!! #1117803
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Why?

    ANY historic aircraft is viable to be put up for sale, at any time. It just depends entirely on the owners’ whim at the time.

    Just because a (fairly rare) Hurricane has been put up for sale, does not mean that it will sell immediately, or even that it will leave the country.

    How long was ex-Historic Flying Spitfire XVIII SM845 on the market for? Six, seven years? OK, it’s left the country, but it’ll doubtless be back!

    Likewise, even if the Hurri leaves the country, there’s others in the pipeline….

    in reply to: Dam Busters On Blue Ray ! #1116997
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    But with a lot of old films being re-released in 3D in the next couple of years (jaws etc)

    If that’s true, I am SO there! 😀

    in reply to: Germany gets a Spitfire! #1116999
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    That’s weird.

    I looked at a photo of ‘154 yesterday and something told me it was going overseas….

    Still, it’ll go beautifully with the Buchon and ‘190 they now have…

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk. T.IX (MODIFIED) #1116416
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    I may be wrong Daz (and I am sure that PA will correct me if I am), but the aircraft converted by Vickers (like 407) don’t count as modified, where as those done as a modern conversion to two seaters are modified. – thats my guess in any case 😀

    Hmm. If that’s the case, then SM520/G-ILDA should have the same description, but doesn’t. :confused:

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk. T.IX (MODIFIED) #1116261
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Surely a little thing such as shorter span ailerons won’t make much of a difference?

    If that’s the case, though, was PL344 ever certified as such, as I recall most Charles Church Spits had the aileron mods….?

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 20,613 total)