dark light

DazDaMan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 20,613 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Introduction: (Robert Stanford-Tuck – Feature Film) #1158707
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    First Light – top book, man. Currently being adapted by the BBC, I believe.

    I think Galland actually had an ashtray installed in the cockpit of his Bf109. A few others probably did, too.

    in reply to: Duxford airshow #1157794
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Two, perhaps three, Buchons?

    in reply to: What Has Slipped Through Your Fingers….. #1156265
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Well, since I removed it, you can stop bitching about it then, can’t you?

    in reply to: what new restored aircraft could appear in 2010 ? #1155922
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    SL633 should fly, but I imagine the Pr.XI and Mk.I are some way off yet.

    DazDaMan
    Participant

    As I understood it, it was a combination of high engine torque and small fin/rudder area, coupled with that knock-kneed undercarriage, that gave the ‘109 family their handling characteristics on the ground. The factory did try throughout the later ‘109 family to try to dampen the effects (larger fin/rudder, for example), but it’s still a handful to the inexperienced.

    One of the reasons why most ‘109s pilots these days have a heck of a lot of hours on other, similarly-powered warbirds before getting their hands on a Messerschmitt.

    in reply to: What Is The Twin In The Far Right Of The Photo? #1153362
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Its hard, doesn’t seem slender enough for a Whirlwind, through the pixels it seems wider, best I could think of was Beaufort/Blenheim or maybe an Oxford?

    I thought Blenheim or Beaufort (looks a bit too portly for a Beaufighter, though).

    in reply to: Bandits at 12 O'clock #1153149
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    the next release Battle of Britain – Scramble!: The Ten Best Commando Battle of Britain Comic Books Ever! is out on the 1st, I’ve asked Mrs BSG to have it for my birthday next week, (44 πŸ™ )…..

    I spied that book in a Past Times shop yesterday morning – along with about three or four shelves’ worth of Spitfire porn…

    in reply to: What film is this? #1148390
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    It’s neither.

    It’s a film created for the IWM’s flight simulator back in the early 1990s, featuring the OFMC Spitfire and Buchon, with TFC’s Spitfire IX ML417.

    If I remember correctly, the camera platform was a T-33.

    Great bit of footage, though.

    Again, if I remember rightly, the first time I saw this was on a Spitfire documentary video (possibly part of Channel 4’s Equinox series, but I could be wrong). I probably still have this somewhere!

    in reply to: Who builds the best aircraft? #1145496
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Now i don’t want this turning into a cat fight!

    When it comes to detail and building who does the better job is it the british or the americans, aussies, germans, etc etc?

    The p-51 is it built better in the states is the spitfire built better in england, if so what are the reasons.?

    Who builds the better engines & why?

    Looking at many pictures of a p-51 with the machine guns in the wings awsome picture for detail.!

    Or are they all built exactly the same to the exact same standard, any extras are just that extras?

    It all depends on what the customer wants and who he/she wants to do the job.

    in reply to: Destruction of 3 Libyan Ju 86Ps & F.O. Reynolds #1140999
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Not sure how the Spitfire in question was adapted but to counter high-flying Ju86R bombers operating over Britain in August 1942 the Special Service Flight operated out of Northolt using Spitfire IX which, according to Pilot Officer Emanuel Galitzine:

    β€œ…had been lightened in almost every possible way. A lighter wooden propeller…..all of the armour had been removed as had the four machine-guns, leaving an armament of only two 20mm Hispano cannons…..painted in a special lightweight finish…..all equipment not strictly necessary for high-altitude combat was removed.”

    The aircraft was 450 pounds lighter than the standard Spitfire IX but no cabin pressurisation was fitted.

    On 12th September 1942 Pilot Officer Emanuel Galitzine intercepted and damaged a Ju86R (with a single hit by a 20mm round) above the Solent at over 43,000 feet in the highest air-combat of World War Two.

    From β€˜Skies of Fire’ by Dr Alfred Price.

    There’s a picture of the singular damage kicking about somewhere – the shell passed straight through the Junkers’ port(?) wing. Only one hit, but I think this more or less proved that the Ju86 WAS vulnerable, even at high altitude.

    in reply to: Destruction of 3 Libyan Ju 86Ps & F.O. Reynolds #1140530
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Pierre Closterman in “The Big Show” describes an action over Scapa Flow on 21st February, 1944. He and Ian Blair were scrambled in their “strato-Spit VIIs” to intercept what they thought would be “one of the new Junkers 86 P’s?”. They got to 43,000ft about 1000ft above their quarry that turned out to be a “Messerschmitt 109 G equipped with two fat auxilliary tanks under the wings” The three aircraft went into a high-speed dive and Blair managed a short burst and the 109 exploded.

    Roger Smith.

    I seem to recall reading somewhere that Closterman actually wasn’t present in that engagement, despite it being in the book. :confused:

    in reply to: Interesting F4U project for sale #1138851
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Interesting use for a Corsair.

    Not an unusual use for any old prop-driven aircraft, though.

    in reply to: Shapley Kittiwake #1135960
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Haven’t a clue, but I had a Google for the beast:

    http://www.aviastar.org/pictures/england/shapley_kittiwake.jpg

    Looks….interesting! πŸ˜‰

    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Some excellent Battle of Britain out-take stuff in this one:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5KlIgzBML4

    in reply to: US PR Spits #1134533
    DazDaMan
    Participant

    Mind you, I had a funny feeling there was a video clip on Google.

    Lo and behold…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arP1IHpD5HI

    As the comments state, there are others of ‘965.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 20,613 total)