Ummm….. becoming a little emotional aren’t we.
yes, 22 years in the RAF and attending a few funerals of close friends tends to make you like that. I don’t care who picks over the remains of downed aircraft as long if human remains are recovered they are treated with the respect they deserve. Frequently the MOD has left our people in unmarked holes in the ground because they don’t want to go to the expense of a recovery. Subsequently the amateurs you seem to despise have come along and the decent thing has been done.
If you are an example of the great ‘professional detachment’ perhaps you should stay away from the scene
But you see I see things like body exhumation and recovery from a scientific point of view – that is how I am trained. However if you read further you would see that I conceded that it was a political matter
It’s not ‘a political matter’ It’s a matter of honouring the dead, if you’re too far up yourself to see how arrogant your comments make you look then there is little hope 😡
As an ex-serviceman my views are this:
If a site is known to have human remains then it should be the duty of the state to ensure the aircrew are recovered and given full military burials regardless of expense. And let’s face it the only reason so many are still ‘missing’ is because it’s more convenient for governments of all political persuasions to save money by pretending they a somehow honouring them by letting them rot unmarked and alone.
If it had all gone for hell in a handcart for me I would rather have been recovered and buried with my mates than left forgotten. Check out the Commonwealth War Graves site in Berlin where the crews are buried in sevens.
You are the Master Controller at the SOC,
You are Joan Hopkins and I claim my £5! 😉
Not for me thanks……………..
I’ll get me coat
What colour is YOUR Bf-108
it’s not a BF108
Mine is sand with pale blue underneath, made by Heller
That and lots of French people were happy to collaborate with the Germans under Vichy, the Resistance was never as strong as de Gaulle made out post-war
Just a thought, hypothetically speaking if I see a Phantom in a UK museum in 1435 Flt colours with a ‘H’ on the tail I’d want it to be the ‘real’ Hope rather than some other Phantom painted to look like her or a sheet metal project where there is so little link to the origional as to be non existant. BUT to someone who’s just on a day out, no special conection to the airframe, does it matter that much? Rather more flyers of ‘dubious provanance’ or representative airframes in museum collections than nothing at all.
Isn’t there a photo of a FW-190D in red stars captured in East Prussa doing the rounds? It usually is captioned something allong the lines that so many were captured they were turned against their origional users and issued to a Red Airforce unit – mind you memory is starting to go…..
Ah well, who needs Air Defence anyway?
We wern’t drawn down mate, we were murdered!
Was up there last night, the builders are tearing down the old guardroom 🙁
Took a few photos for old times sake, it was the Families Club in my day. Apparently they can’t find the original land owner to pass the site back to.
But ‘Sharkey’ Ward CO 801 NAS dismissed the results saying he was ‘not surprised’ on finding out which pilots flew the Sea Harriers in DACT on this occasion!
Good old Sharkey, as modest and self-effacing a bloke as you’re likley to meet
Carm down dear, it’s just a comercial
French did DACT with Harriers