dark light

Maple 01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F100 T 33 And Mystere #829046
    Maple 01
    Participant

    I can vouch for the indestructibility of the P-80/T-33 (ish) family, I’v been playing ‘Fallout 3’ and there are Seastars (ish) on the carrier in Rivet City, that’s set in 2277 so they’re 329 years old and have been through a nuclear war – Lockheed build them strong!

    in reply to: RAFM shoots itself in the foot…again…? #832675
    Maple 01
    Participant

    it did not cause you offence before but does now?

    Because it’s only just come to my attention – didn’t know there was a time-limit on pointing out bad taste (at best)

    The community that made the posting is full of ex-RAF types…….perhaps we’re not all that keen on the concept art as it’s in bad taste?

    the RAF charities that benefit from the money raised are to date somewhere near £90k better off for having had these events on.

    Great, but could only be achieved by use of tasteless advertising?

    Plus it doesn’t take too much digging online to see that the events are run, adjudicated, and managed by an external company to RAFM.

    So either the RAFM approved the montage or no ‘grown-up’ saw it before it was released to do a ‘sanity check’ – impressive

    in reply to: RAFM shoots itself in the foot…again…? #833418
    Maple 01
    Participant

    If they’re that enamoured with the period of “The few” that they use an iconic image of that period to promote a “fun run”, why did they get rid of their excellent BoB hall?

    Because the RAF museum is not about Aircraft or the RAF……it’s about running a museum ‘in the correct style’- why else would you appoint a non-SME to run the place?

    in reply to: RAFM shoots itself in the foot…again…? #833431
    Maple 01
    Participant

    And judging by the ‘fella’ leaning in the door way, it looks like a publicity shot staged for the press.

    That’s Arnold, and tea’s up!

    in reply to: RAFM shoots itself in the foot…again…? #833624
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Sense of humour failure. Have you got a thing against the RAFM? It reads like it.

    No, it seems like a tasteless and badly thought-out publicity stunt – perhaps you’d be OK with the photo of troops running down the ramp of a LCA in North Africa with runners superimposed?

    in reply to: Russian Metal for Ident. #833712
    Maple 01
    Participant

    I can see a D

    in reply to: RAFM shoots itself in the foot…again…? #833713
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Oh FFS

    in reply to: "Hurricane" film trailer drops…. #837065
    Maple 01
    Participant

    The American voice followed by the Airfix Hurricane wobbling as it’s hit…….

    in reply to: Lysander compared to Storch #837346
    Maple 01
    Participant

    A Storch was the aircraft that landed & took off in the middle of Berlin near the Brandenburg Gate during the fierce fighting that was taking place during the last days.

    They also did that with Ju-52s……..it’s a fair bet a Lysander could do it too, the Heerstrasse by the bunker is quite wide, long and straight

    in reply to: Tornado F2/F3 development aircraft for disposal #770646
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Was she one of the F2s that were amalgimated into bent F3 frames that Airwork had ********-up?

    in reply to: Mystery Pressure Gauge #791823
    Maple 01
    Participant

    That being the case an instrument from a Met Hastings?

    in reply to: Dassault Mystere IVA Survivors #792234
    Maple 01
    Participant

    ……….how about a mysterious outbreak of disappearing air-frames? Worked, I mean is alleged to have worked for

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Technical_Museum,_Peenem%C3%BCnde

    In 1990 as the East German Air Force was dissolving JG9 at Peenemunde were told to get rid of the historic air-frames they held and that all their Floggers were going to be scraped. Very mysteriously just before they were due to be binned a Fished, Flogger and Faggot (and perhaps a Farmer) vanished over the course of the week. In totally unconnected news an unknown group of people were alleged to have access to a large former electricity generating plant with a freight lift large enough to take huge cargoes……some say it was big enough to take a fully assembled Flogger….

    The Luftwaffe rolled-up to make sure the demolitions had been carried-out, but shock horror, no one could find four aircraft……the Luftwaffe searched the airfield with the expected German level of thoughtfulness but found nothing, and there were no witnesses. Ah well, probably been stolen for scrap, who was that bothered about a pile of obsolete aluminium anyway? Case closed, Molder and Skully not available.

    Totally unrelated fact, a while after the Luftwaffe had give up and written off the air-frames aircraft that couldn’t possibly have been the missing ones were found and donated to the museum. The case had been closed, the paperwork was done, the station was closed no-one in the Luftwaffe was interested.

    Perhaps history might repeat itself again? If not with the Mystere perhaps the F100, all it would take is some disreputable ex-RAF types, a foggy night, a convenient shed/HAS and a case of Schultheiss……..Everyone’s happy, the Museum’s lost an eyesore, The Americans no longer have to count something that’s ‘missing’ and can be written-off the books and a totally unrelated air-frame mysteriously appears somewhere it can be loved and appreciated

    in reply to: Museum Of RAF Firefighting To Close #801560
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Perhaps worth comparing number of aircraft in RAF / RN service and total flying hours in the 1950’s / 1960’s before suggesting thing were less safe. Any loss is bad, tragic if it is fatal, but no less avoidable today than fifty years ago.

    That’s not how the RAF saw it it the time…..hence the numerous articles trying to create a culture of flight safety in a post-war airforce rather than the ‘press-on regardless’ risk taking more suited to the war years

    in reply to: Museum Of RAF Firefighting To Close #802429
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Go further back and have a look at the losses for the early 1950’s, ridiculous loss of life and aircraft – flight safety was clearly not ‘a thing’ then

    https://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?43847-RAF-Losses-1952

    in reply to: Avro Anson as art #818654
    Maple 01
    Participant

    …….too late…..seems the head of the RAFM doesn’t understand why her museum has to be full of smelly old aeroplanes

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 411 total)