Give up Moggy and just enjoy the pool/beach! Nothing there that would interest me. I always do some foreward planning before booking a holiday, to ensure there is some aviation museum or airport/air base nearby, as frying on the beach every day is not my cup of tea!
I think that Austers look great no matter what the colour scheme is. However for visibility in the air perhaps camouflage would not be best even with invasion stripes. ๐
I quite agree. There are already far too many Austers repainted in military colours. Every year yet another owner decides to retro their aircraft back to its military camouflage, which is a pity. I can understand AOP.9s being camouflaged as there were very few that weren’t but other owners often seem to fail to reach the superb standards of Richard and the Eggesford Group when it comes to accurately restoring military Austers. There’s nothing worse that a fully converted BEAGLE Terrier wearing camouflage and its original military serial masquerading as an old military Auster,without being properly de-converted. If the aircraft in question has a period 1940s-50s UK civil registration, there is nothing nicer than a smart civilian scheme such as G-AMMS,’GXU or ‘JYB (shown here) wear and with the Auster company twin-stripes trademark down the fuselage side.
We then went past the old Sek Kong airfield – and I discreetly photographed a Puma/Cougar in the circuit……. ๐ฎ
Ken
Let’s see it then Ken?
I did take a pic of St Stephens beach where we used to go swimming…..
Ken
When I was there, we were told the beaches were so polluted, that it was not recommended to swim in the sea there. Instead we used to go to the swimming pool on Stonecutters Island or hire a motorised Junk and take it out to a remote island where the water was unpolluted.
Nooooo!
Airfix are little polythene bags with a cardboard header,
Moggy
During the poly bag era, the header was not cardboard, but printed paper that unfolded with the instructions inside.
Nooooo!
Airfix are little polythene bags with a cardboard header,
Moggy
During the poly bag era, the header was not cardboard, but printed paper that unfolded with the instructions inside.
There is some terrific stuff here, thanks to everyone for sharing them. The story of the fuselages at Aqaba is wonderful!
A few more from me.
Tut, tut, Steve….thread creep! These are MEAF and FEAF Beverleys and Argosies, not ‘Transport Command’! ๐
I was in HK recently – and found the married quarter where we used to live in Sek Kong – still there 50 years later !!!
Happy Days…….. ๐ฎ
My photos of the whole China/Hong Kong trip are here.
Ken
Surprised you got away with that photo Ken. Isn’t Sek Kong now a PLAAF base with Chinese-built Dauphins based there? Where were the guards?
BTW I was in Hong Kong during 1979-81 as a JATC Ops.Controller based in the Police HQ on Hong Kong Island. Have many happy memories of flying in 28th Squadron Wessexes, Army Scouts and RHKAAF aircraft. As you say, Happy Days!
The glare panel does it’s job fine. The inaccuracy is the fact it should be a continuation of the grey top for that particular colour scheme. It’s not a problem to us, though I’m sure there will be one or two folks out there that just can’t live with it.
Regards
Rich
Presume you will get around to overpainting the anti-glare panel in the correct grey eventually? It would finish it off nicely (and accurately) if you can.
Press Day for the delivery of the Andovers to 46 Squadron at Abingdon in December 1966.

Lyneham’s gate guard Comet 2, XK699, arriving there from storage at Henlow in October 1986

Britannia C.1, XM520 (and others) seen outside the terminal building at RAF Lyneham in 1962

Line-up at RAF Lyneham of Comets and Britannias on a stormy day in 1965
The flight safety and information brochure that was found in the back of the seats on Lyneham’s aircraft in the ’60s
Il-fated Britannia C.1, XL638, taken at Lyneham in June 1967 from a 216 Sqn. Comet 4C.
This aircraft crashed at Khormaksar the following October, when it ran off the end of the runway into the sea!
I also attended the Press Day on Wednesday and was very impressed to see the Shack in its new paint scheme for the first time, which is a first class job.To have it run its engines up was the icing on the cake and a wonderfully nostalgic experience to behold. Even the bomb doors (or ‘weapons doors’ to be pc) were opened as shown here.Just wondered when #2 engine will be back on line?

….looks like the start of yet another cheery thread Tim? ๐
Here’s some more of that lovely orange dayglo,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I42lzNAUm8c
Hang onโฆ*Red* Pelicans?
๐
Dare I say it, now they were a different shade of Dayglo altogether, specially mixed for the team!
Ah XM192 – the Airfix Lightning. Have built that kit many moons ago and nice to see the real thing still alive and in the same markings as the kit.
Adrian. Interesting but irrelevant really. We know the blood red dayglo is not the same as the roundel red. Do you have swatches of the two different dayglo colours to compare?
Actually I think the Dayglo colour used has been the same all along, but they may have used different batches or photos may show it slightly differently in different lighting conditions. However well maintained it was, it would tend to fade slightly with each prolonged exposure, going to a slightly more orangish hue before being repainted once again. This whole issue is between ‘dayglo’ and ‘red’ and some people can’t tell the difference, which is made all the more confusing when different makes of film try to portray this.
I think we have all exhausted this subject ad-infinitum, so let’s move on.
Sorry Pagen01, I have no info on the thimble-nosed SP.
I can’t even be bothered to argue with the ‘knockers’.
Cummon Moggy, when you’re face to face with a couple of ‘knockers’, you know you love them! ๐