dark light

EagleSpirit

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 168 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rebels sieze Syrian AFB with L-39s #2370629
    EagleSpirit
    Participant

    Not enough fuel to fly the working planes away?

    in reply to: Training aircraft syllabus, different air forces #2372600
    EagleSpirit
    Participant

    ROKAF
    KT-1 (Basic) -> T-50 (Advanced) -> TA-50 (LIFT) -> fighter

    in reply to: T-50, M-346 and Yak-130 advance trainers future prospect? #2242458
    EagleSpirit
    Participant

    Exactly.

    Thank you for teaching me something new!:D

    in reply to: T-50, M-346 and Yak-130 advance trainers future prospect? #2242465
    EagleSpirit
    Participant

    You are still confused. An airframe is not designed for sustained g-load, it is designed for the limit load factor of +8g. The sustained load can be whatever it needs to be – it is irrelevant.

    3. Sustained load is not meaningless, it is a key air combat capability parameter. It is useful to know if you want to realistically train for air combat.

    So limit load is how strong the airframe is while sustained load is how maneuverable the aircraft is?

    in reply to: T-50, M-346 and Yak-130 advance trainers future prospect? #2242475
    EagleSpirit
    Participant

    You are still confused. An airframe is not designed for sustained g-load, it is designed for the limit load factor of +8g. The sustained load can be whatever it needs to be – it is irrelevant.

    The only potential aspect is airframe fatigue in light of the T-X curriculum, this is a minor issue that can be addressed very easily at this stage (before series production rather than as a retrofit).

    Looking at the brochure on this page.
    http://www.aleniaaermacchi.it/en-US/Products/Pages/M-346.aspx

    1. What is sustained load factor?
    2. Why is it the limit load (of 8g) at sea level but 5.2g at 15000ft?
    3. Why include this meaningless information in the brochure about sustained load factor? When is knowing how much sustained load factor an aircraft has useful?

    in reply to: Indian AMCA and Korean KFX #2244080
    EagleSpirit
    Participant

    Japan isn’t making anything, don’t kid yourself. They’re already petitioning Washington for access to US 6th gen programs, with F-3 merely as a fallback to provide ‘leverage’. Yeah, some leverage when you have systematically caved at every turn to date. They’ll bow and take whatever scraps Uncle Sam feeds them. No, Japan is not a viable partner for India.

    Thats quite a….. negative outlook. Now the the ATD-X doesn’t make an F-3 but they seem to be going towards one.

    in reply to: Kaveri Engine is a non starter for LCA #2248421
    EagleSpirit
    Participant

    Unlike India, China doesn’t even have the option of buying US and European engines and China’s local engines aren’t working, forcing them to rely on Russia for engines.

    They’re going to work them out eventually.

    in reply to: Boeing vs Eurofighter vs Lockheed for KFX #2248711
    EagleSpirit
    Participant

    why does Korea need PAKFA? to fight China? they don’t have a conflict with China.
    China would be better off with North Korea out of the picture and a unified Korean Peninsula with the Americans gone,
    China has already threatened sanctions on the North for further nuclear tests.

    I think China might make a bargain that they wont interfere but since it was NK that brought the US to Korea the US should leave when NK is no more.

    in reply to: T-50, M-346 and Yak-130 advance trainers future prospect? #2249956
    EagleSpirit
    Participant

    /facepalm

    The phrase ‘more importantly than supersonic’ does NOT in any way indicate

    Well ‘more than’ would be meaningless if supersonic wasn’t important.

    If I had more money than a homeless man that would mean nothing. While saying I had more money than Bill Gates would mean something.

    Alenia obviously thought that supersonic was important enough that they could say a ‘high sustained-G environment’ is more important.

    in reply to: Boeing vs Eurofighter vs Lockheed for KFX #2250018
    EagleSpirit
    Participant

    I note that KF-X Block 1 features Radar Absorbing Material while Block 2 features Radar Absorbing Structure. Does that mean the same structure as Block 1 but using materials incorporating radar absorbtion qualities?

    Basically RAM means paint while RAS means making the airframe out of fancy materials that reduce RCS like the F-35.

    (You know more people would be interested in this thread if SlowMan and Burrito weren’t having a nationalistic e-peen dual)

    in reply to: Boeing vs Eurofighter vs Lockheed for KFX #2250360
    EagleSpirit
    Participant

    Aha… I mis(?)interpreted the text as if SAAB was chosen as a partner for the KF-X project. If so I thought there would be some kind of annoucment. I guess they where only discussing one of the proposals going forward for KF-X.

    Organisations like

    http://www.add.re.kr/
    http://www.kida.re.kr/

    discussed proposals for all aspects of the KFX

    in reply to: Boeing vs Eurofighter vs Lockheed for KFX #2250437
    EagleSpirit
    Participant

    Interesting.

    Do you, or anyone else reading this thread, have another source for that? (I.e. a source that is not a forum posting / blog post)

    All that stuff was from a debate where people from different organisations debated on how to proceed with F-X(3) and KF-X. There and people and pictures but your not going to get anything official like a transcription. This is Korea’s next fighter, I’m glad we get even this much info.

    http://pds27.egloos.com/pds/201301/29/24/f0082824_5107357f0472b.jpg
    http://pds26.egloos.com/pds/201301/29/24/f0082824_5107357f7ddfc.jpg

    in reply to: UK replacement MPA, what would you choose #2251313
    EagleSpirit
    Participant

    What is a “forward looking infrared radar”? Somebody doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

    The snot went out of my nose when I realized he was talking about FLIR:D

    in reply to: Kaveri Engine is a non starter for LCA #2252428
    EagleSpirit
    Participant

    Goodbye Tejas.

    Do the GE engines ruin everything?

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 21 #2259769
    EagleSpirit
    Participant

    How about “fancypants”?

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 168 total)