Wings – I believe if I want to bang the drum for hangarage that is my perogative.
I have lost count of the numbers of preservation groups that have failed who’s sole preserve was to slap some paint and tinker with an aircraft in a field without any idea of a long term aim.
Of course it’s your right but it’s the right of those who taxi these aircraft and don’t find hangarage to do just that! Repeat yourself ad infinitum if you wish but it won’t do much good unless those with the aircraft have access to land, money and planning permission!
You David think this a priority whilst others such as the shackleton group that Rich is involved with May have other ideas. Rich… His high on your priority list is finding a hangar for the shackleton and if it’s not your number one priority why is it not? I’d be fascinated to hear the other side on this if you have the time.
That is just Begging to have a vintage clock mounted in it:cool:
Noooooooooooo! π
Yet another example of shoddy sloppy journalism! All they had to do was check the website – everything you need to know is there. I doubt we will see an apology……
Maybe it wasn’t a mistake. Maybe the wording of the title and the muddy nature of the article was vague in attempt up get more interest. Often you will see ‘last airworthy spitfire’ or something along those lines but then see it refers to a particular type or something like that somewhere in the article.
You will only see an apology of you write an email expressing your outrage.
Yawn
Charming π
A hangar does to a massive degree! The current trend of keeping them ‘live’ is fine as long as it doesn’t distract from the real issues of getting roofs over airframes.
I think everyone gets it David. It’s your part piece to say this over and over. It’s true of course but maybe in the first instance fundraising/sorting planning permission/buying land for a hangar isn’t as enjoyable for some small groups as actually working on the aircraft.
Taxying a Shackleton up and down a runway doesn’t address the long term issue with all these machines that live outside -long term deterioration!
No one said it did. A hangar does to some degree.
find it extremely frustrating when a seemingly minor aspect of the restoration (the colours and markings) is wrongly reproduced.
But it’s not wrongly reproduced if someone is painting it in a scheme of their own. Spencer Flacks aircraft for example wasn’t reproducing anything – he just painted it a colour he found pleasing. The jag can be painted any colour the owner wishes and it is not incorrect as it is a new scheme.
I hope they paint it with polka dots myself.
Does an aircraft like Just Jane upset you too? It has two sets of squadron codes and a non authentic nose art. When is the line crossed?
If you like this try ‘the life and death of colonel blimp’.
It’s not a war film. It’s not about war, it just happens to be set at that time. The war is merely a backdrop.
I wonder what he wears when he is actually dressing up?
Must see where I can pick up one of those Stars and Stripes bum bags. Goes with everything!
Thanks
Depressing that the website person uses the word ‘aircrafts’ in the URL.
Very depressing indeed. I’ve decided not to go this year π
Let’s all look forward too seeing some grate flying by sum brilliant aircrafts.
As the museum posts here on occasion, may I ask would the museum ever consider adding another Second World War bomber type to the collection or even embarking on an audacious restoration of something like the Wellington remains?
The museum to me is a incredible achievement and I’ve always admired the sound business footing it is done on.
Excellent – thoroughly deserved, of course.
Moggy
After all they’ve done for this country the last thing they deserve is to be put in a room with those two! π
In all seriousness, good to see them recognised.
All the best
Your comment is a nonsense. I’m sorry but it is.
Well, I accept all the arguments regarding generalisation but I assume we take that point as understood! I’m talking about a general (national) mood here and immigrants (at least large proportions of them) are not – have no reason to be – “proud” of this country. I live in a city that has a huge number of immigrants and if we exclude the issue of exceptions, the majority have no interest in this country at all. They live in their own communities, pursue their own religions and traditions, and have no relationship with anybody else, unless it’s to complain that they are somehow being treated badly when it suits. They live here because it’s the best life they can get (and I don’t blame them for that – who wouldn’t?) but they don’t have any pride or even any interest in this country’s history or values. They’re here because it’s the best place on offer, not because they somehow admire the place. Okay, you might think that’s just a typically racist view from somebody who has an agenda or a blinkered view but I’m not stupid and I’m perfectly capable of seeing and hearing what goes on around me. Likewise, even one of the local MPs who was responsible for one area to which this view certainly applies (David Blunkett) clearly stated the same view only a few weeks ago.
It’s not a case of blaming immigrants for everything that might be wrong with this country – in many respects the situation is of our making. But to imagine that immigration has created multi-cultural co-existence is a nonsense, peddled by fools and politically-minded liberals who refuse to accept reality. Blunkett said as much and many others who are just as qualified to comment have said the same. They’re right. It’s easy to believe the rubbish peddled by some politicians (supported by the media) who express their liberal views whilst retreating to their comfy homes in the country, but the reality is rather different. We know this is the case, as it’s precisely why UKIP became so popular.
The problem is that far too many people are still scared to express a view in case they’re branded as “racist” even though there’s nothing wrong with being racist. The word is shamefully misused. I’m English, or British. Proud to be so, An awful lot of people are not and I disagree that it’s wrong to claim that a huge number of these individuals are immigrants. It’s not their fault – why would they have any pride in what is (to them) a foreign country? I have indeed spoken to lots of people about this issue and you’d probably be horrified at some of the things that get said.
It isn’t just an immigration issue though. There are plenty of British people who also have no pride in their own country. You mention street parties. What street parties? The ones shown by the media? I can assure you there hasn’t been so much as one street party within miles of me since 1977β¦ and there were few even then. It’s easy for the media and some politicians to present a view of the country which is a long way from reality. As I said, I entirely agree that it would be wrong to paint all immigrants with the same proverbial brush and of course I wasn’t aiming to do that. But at the same time, if you think my comments are nonsense, I think you may well be either wilfully deluding yourself, or you are accepting far too much rubbish that is fed to us through out television sets!
Anyway, we’re heading off on a big, fat tangent here that has nothing to do with Jaguars, so apologies to the Jaguar fans who are wondering where the hell this thread has gone! π
WH904, for the record. I don’t think you are narrow minded or a rascist at all but I disagree with many of your points. I think you are right and we should let the comments revert to Jaguars. I’ve enjoyed reading your comments and hope maybe we can both take something away from each other’s views.
Apologies for the short reply to your considered answer. Away at present
It’s not all that bad is it?
Some would say that it really is that bad. True, the Union Flag is plastered over everything in tourist shops over in London, and the flag is always wheeled-out if there is some commercial reason to use it. But our flag really is not treated with the same respect as the United States equivalent. I think it’s because British people simply don’t make the same connection with it. They don’t see it as a representation of their country other than in the most general sense. But the main difference is that the majority of British citizens simply don’t have the same pride in their own country.
In this sense we’re very different from the States. We used to defend this attitude by saying that it was a typical British attitude (i.e. – reservation and under-statement) but we’ve created a different society now, thanks to new generations of younger people and large numbers of immigrants, all of whom have different attitudes and values. Obviously, immigrants have no reason to share any pride in this country’s values (or its flag), but we make no effort to encourage them toβ¦ unlike in the USA. The same applies to younger people. Having pride in our country would be seen as either “uncool” or jingoistic.
So over on this side of the pond, displaying a flag is seen as slightly odd and/or suspicious (unless it’s patently for commercial gain). It’s a very sad situation. The same issue is even worse when applied to England’s flag. The flag was rarely used or seen, until it became the symbol of far-right political groups. That was the start of a process that tainted the flag, and the problem got even worse when it was embraced by supporters of the national football team. Consequently, if anyone ventures to wear or display England’s flag, they would now be perceived as being either a pseudo-fascist, or a football fan. It’s absurd! π
I see your point in some respects but I think you are overstating. British people are proud of their country. Look at the Jubilee and the street parties across the country. BUT it is a patriotism which in my opinion is quieter and not institutionalised like in the US. In US schools, or some anyhow, they pledge allegiance to the flag and ram patriotism down the nations throat. Even admitting to be an atheist is taboo in some parts of the US. Then they tell you at an airshow that these are the freedoms that the populace enjoy.. Hmmm. In this country I think the public exercises a healthy scepticism over such grand flag waving gestures but in times of celebration we certainly show enthusiasm.
As for your comments about immigrants not having any reason to share any pride in this countries values and flag then that is another glorious generalisation which I challenge you to back up. I know several immigrants to this country who are proud of this country and it’s values. Some of these have fought for this country. Your comment is a nonsense. I’m sorry but it is. Immigrants are not one type of person. They are individuals. Good and bad just like people in this country. When you start speaking how ‘immigrants’ feel you fall into the greatest and easiest type of trap there is. How many immigrant friends or colleagues do you have? If you have any, ask around and see how they feel. I know many who love this country.