Do stay Setter
all the above arguments against your leaving are valid…..Except your own! 😉
Crikey!,
Many thanks 682al, what was the production run time wise for this type, first flight ect?.
Now what the blooming heck was a Valleta/Viking doing at Sawbridgeworth post war?…….and possibly dismantled as well??……walks away muttering…..why did I pick it up in the first place……….. should stick to stamp collecting…..curses… 😀
A Vickers Viking? :confused:
Hmmmm,
Military flying ceased in 1944 from Sawbridgeworth according to records. Looking through the list of types on the squadrons there were quite a few odd men out so to speak.
A DH48 Dominie, an Airspeed Oxford,Fairey Battle (single engined I know) Miles Martinet (again a single engine) .
Post war there was a Hiller 360, never seen one of those to comment!, a Piper Pawnee and a Grunman Agcat, again a single engined aircraft.
As far as I am aware the airfield was never used to dismantle aircraft, although it is possible that the odd type may have been scrapped on site. I shall not hold my breath waiting for an ID on this part, Many thanks for all of your help people 🙂
oops, just googled Hiller 360, it’s a fling wing 😀
Just googled Sawbridgeworth, yep, the link refers to my own website 🙂
Dont think it is off of a Mosquito, Bruce would know of course. The Whitley and Hudson possibility is interesting though.
Found plenty of bits at both Hunsdon and Sawbridgeworth over the years, the sort of things that get damaged or replaced were just tossed into the ditches and fields by riggers and fitters. This is different though, not the sort of thing to get replaced on a dispersal is it?. One of those things that will bug me forever!.
It was just a quarter of a mile from the airfield perimeter according to one local source.
I know someone who found fragments of airframe at (the) crash site a few years ago but there was another Lancaster that crashed nearby, as yet no identity of what exact site is the Nuremburg Lancaster.
/
Because it was probably the only image some ‘researcher’ could be bothered to find, ‘Ah!, that photo is tagged Spitfire, I will use that’ 😀
Thanks for the replys so far
I dont know where googles ref to B-26 aircraft being based there came from, I do know for an absolute fact that they were not 😉
.
2(AC) squadron lysanders,Tomahawk 1’s then Mustang 1’s were the principal squadron at Sawbridgeworth,
63, 168 and 170 squadrons(Mustang 1’s)
4(AC) squadron (Mustangs then later in 1944 with spitfire (PR) B flight of 4 squadron had Mosquito’s.
80 squadron (Spitfires)
268 Squadron (Spitfire)
126 squadron (Spitfire 1Xe’s)
1419 Flight (Lysander)
I had the pleasure of meeting R.S Tuck and Adolph Galland at North Weald many years ago, Bob Tuck signed a copy of a book for me, I thanked him stepped back and trod straight on Gallands foot 😮
He didnt sign the book 😀
A better description
Light / Glass.
The light is composed of a thick, translucent glass (about the size of a soup can) mounted over a rather standard looking auto-like incandescent bulb. The top of the glass shade is “dappled” or “pebbled” in an irregular pattern, while the sides are ringed with sharp, faceted prisms.
MountThe mount is very simple; consisting of fairly heavy black painted brass with a single screw hole on the bottom
The glass “light cover” slips over the bulb and is secured by a black painted, brass ring that slides over the glass and is secured to the bottom of the mount by three regular-headed screws.
Markings.
The light has few markings besides the standard British Air Ministry (A crown M) and the date 1942. The light has a pronounced “rim” or “flange” on which two level indicators (bubbles) are affixed. NOTE, (the unit would not normally come with the bubble indicators these were added for another use.) On the underside of this flange is painted the numeral “6” and six small dots in two horizontal rows of three dots each (all in yellowish white).
Underneath the glass cover is the word “Holophane” On the side of the mount are two white, horizontal painted “stripes” each about 2 1/2 inches in length. This paint has faded/yellowed over time, but compares favourably with luminous paint from the period.This light was used as a landing airfield indicator and a drop zone indicator, with the bubbles attached. but this was a mod on what it was originally.
It now sits on a tripod apparently, but all I have is the image and cannot see where that would attach either!.
That is a very good point of yours ref the flying boat connection 682al, and that is the essence of the identification of this lamp fitting……where did it originate before being modified for use by airborne forces??.
One of our suppliers uses part of Wyton as a storage base, I was there last week and the manager told me that they were on the move to find other premises as Marshalls were moving in.
There you go, another urban myth? or news from the horses mouth? 😀
I know there is a rather large bomb inside the Hangar, but it does look a little more modern than the Tallboy, either that or it is one that has been refurbished.
.Which would these NIMBY’s prefer, the odd few aircraft movements, or a massive population influx ?
They would prefer a massive population influx, this way they can grow a larger ego that would serve them well by writing many letters to local papers. They could then complain on a grander scale about the influx of ‘outsiders’, unwarranted housing, the loss of the Purple three legged
uncrested Newt to the local ponds and the noise caused by Eastern European building workers 😉 .
May not be able to make it after all, bit of a crisis on at the moment 🙁 .