dark light

Denis

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 1,384 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Open letter apology to TFC and stephen Grey #1378135
    Denis
    Participant

    Do stay Setter
    all the above arguments against your leaving are valid…..Except your own! 😉

    in reply to: what is this off of? #1379885
    Denis
    Participant

    Crikey!,
    Many thanks 682al, what was the production run time wise for this type, first flight ect?.

    Now what the blooming heck was a Valleta/Viking doing at Sawbridgeworth post war?…….and possibly dismantled as well??……walks away muttering…..why did I pick it up in the first place……….. should stick to stamp collecting…..curses… 😀

    in reply to: what is this off of? #1380308
    Denis
    Participant

    A Vickers Viking? :confused:

    in reply to: what is this off of? #1380318
    Denis
    Participant

    Hmmmm,
    Military flying ceased in 1944 from Sawbridgeworth according to records. Looking through the list of types on the squadrons there were quite a few odd men out so to speak.
    A DH48 Dominie, an Airspeed Oxford,Fairey Battle (single engined I know) Miles Martinet (again a single engine) .
    Post war there was a Hiller 360, never seen one of those to comment!, a Piper Pawnee and a Grunman Agcat, again a single engined aircraft.
    As far as I am aware the airfield was never used to dismantle aircraft, although it is possible that the odd type may have been scrapped on site. I shall not hold my breath waiting for an ID on this part, Many thanks for all of your help people 🙂
    oops, just googled Hiller 360, it’s a fling wing 😀

    in reply to: what is this off of? #1382519
    Denis
    Participant

    Just googled Sawbridgeworth, yep, the link refers to my own website 🙂

    Dont think it is off of a Mosquito, Bruce would know of course. The Whitley and Hudson possibility is interesting though.
    Found plenty of bits at both Hunsdon and Sawbridgeworth over the years, the sort of things that get damaged or replaced were just tossed into the ditches and fields by riggers and fitters. This is different though, not the sort of thing to get replaced on a dispersal is it?. One of those things that will bug me forever!.

    in reply to: Nuremburg Lancaster #1382531
    Denis
    Participant

    It was just a quarter of a mile from the airfield perimeter according to one local source.
    I know someone who found fragments of airframe at (the) crash site a few years ago but there was another Lancaster that crashed nearby, as yet no identity of what exact site is the Nuremburg Lancaster.

    in reply to: Concorde or Spitfire? #1382876
    Denis
    Participant

    /
    Because it was probably the only image some ‘researcher’ could be bothered to find, ‘Ah!, that photo is tagged Spitfire, I will use that’ 😀

    in reply to: what is this off of? #1383121
    Denis
    Participant

    Thanks for the replys so far
    I dont know where googles ref to B-26 aircraft being based there came from, I do know for an absolute fact that they were not 😉
    .
    2(AC) squadron lysanders,Tomahawk 1’s then Mustang 1’s were the principal squadron at Sawbridgeworth,

    63, 168 and 170 squadrons(Mustang 1’s)

    4(AC) squadron (Mustangs then later in 1944 with spitfire (PR) B flight of 4 squadron had Mosquito’s.

    80 squadron (Spitfires)

    268 Squadron (Spitfire)

    126 squadron (Spitfire 1Xe’s)

    1419 Flight (Lysander)

    in reply to: Robert Roland Stanford Tuck #1391989
    Denis
    Participant

    I had the pleasure of meeting R.S Tuck and Adolph Galland at North Weald many years ago, Bob Tuck signed a copy of a book for me, I thanked him stepped back and trod straight on Gallands foot 😮
    He didnt sign the book 😀

    in reply to: AM stamped light unit #1409052
    Denis
    Participant

    A better description

    Light / Glass.

    The light is composed of a thick, translucent glass (about the size of a soup can) mounted over a rather standard looking auto-like incandescent bulb. The top of the glass shade is “dappled” or “pebbled” in an irregular pattern, while the sides are ringed with sharp, faceted prisms.

    MountThe mount is very simple; consisting of fairly heavy black painted brass with a single screw hole on the bottom
    The glass “light cover” slips over the bulb and is secured by a black painted, brass ring that slides over the glass and is secured to the bottom of the mount by three regular-headed screws.

    Markings.
    The light has few markings besides the standard British Air Ministry (A crown M) and the date 1942. The light has a pronounced “rim” or “flange” on which two level indicators (bubbles) are affixed. NOTE, (the unit would not normally come with the bubble indicators these were added for another use.) On the underside of this flange is painted the numeral “6” and six small dots in two horizontal rows of three dots each (all in yellowish white).
    Underneath the glass cover is the word “Holophane” On the side of the mount are two white, horizontal painted “stripes” each about 2 1/2 inches in length. This paint has faded/yellowed over time, but compares favourably with luminous paint from the period.This light was used as a landing airfield indicator and a drop zone indicator, with the bubbles attached. but this was a mod on what it was originally.

    in reply to: AM stamped light unit #1412265
    Denis
    Participant

    It now sits on a tripod apparently, but all I have is the image and cannot see where that would attach either!.
    That is a very good point of yours ref the flying boat connection 682al, and that is the essence of the identification of this lamp fitting……where did it originate before being modified for use by airborne forces??.

    in reply to: Marshalls airfield Cambridge #1427224
    Denis
    Participant

    One of our suppliers uses part of Wyton as a storage base, I was there last week and the manager told me that they were on the move to find other premises as Marshalls were moving in.
    There you go, another urban myth? or news from the horses mouth? 😀

    in reply to: How many preserved Tallboy's/Grandslam's ? #1367605
    Denis
    Participant

    I know there is a rather large bomb inside the Hangar, but it does look a little more modern than the Tallboy, either that or it is one that has been refurbished.

    in reply to: Scrapping photos at Kemble? #1370418
    Denis
    Participant

    .Which would these NIMBY’s prefer, the odd few aircraft movements, or a massive population influx ?

    They would prefer a massive population influx, this way they can grow a larger ego that would serve them well by writing many letters to local papers. They could then complain on a grander scale about the influx of ‘outsiders’, unwarranted housing, the loss of the Purple three legged
    uncrested Newt to the local ponds and the noise caused by Eastern European building workers 😉 .

    in reply to: Forum visit, DH Museum, 11th December #1378698
    Denis
    Participant

    May not be able to make it after all, bit of a crisis on at the moment 🙁 .

Viewing 15 posts - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 1,384 total)