I bet he’s got something better than Photoshop!
About blinking time! Took a flood of biblical proportions first, mind you:rolleyes::D
Could be the next Raymond Baxter!
Can I have your autograph??:D
Moggy you seem to have a bit of an issue with this point, at the end of the day no major film that will be released to a mass audience is going to use the name ‘Nigger’ in it, it’ as simple as that really.
‘Nigsy’ seems to be a good trade off.I’m just glad the film is being made, with the people that are making it, and the effort that is obviously being put into it. It is entertainment after all, hopefully it will bring a bit of our history to a new an uneducated audience.
I’ll agree with that, Pagen
Perhaps we could call the dog Snigger?:D
agreed:)
Everyone on here knows 100% more than Joe Public when it comes to aeroplanes. Of course we know this practice is safe. Sheesh, even the CofG fuel mgt system shifts more weight around than a stack of talking baggage.
Now put yourself in the eyes of Mr Joe public. His wife and kids are about to get on an aeroplane. In his eyes, with aeroplanes, problems usually mean death. There’s no lay-by at 35k.
Nowthen, a locked luggage door. Means problems with luggage door. The Paris DC-10 had luggage door problems. Get the picture?Can’t blame the passengers. Mis-communication on behalf of some tin-pot airline also doesn’t help.
Again, spot on
All I’ve tried to do on this thread is balance the view.
You are all knowledgable in either aviation or the airline industry, Joe Public is not.
What made 70 people so scared they wouldn’t get on that aeroplane.
What it boils down to is ignorance and fear, a powerful combination, although its possible the airline could have handled it better.
A quote from a passenger:
“The pilot came out to speak to us and told us it was perfectly safe.
“When someone asked if the hold door could open when we were in the air at 20,000ft, he couldn’t understand and walked away.”
Now, whilst this question may be a little ridiculous, the fear behind it is genuine, and the pilot should do his/her best to address it.
Two modern airliners have been lost in the last few days for reason/s unknown, how safe do they think flying is now??
Unless the Airlines sort out this side of customer care it will happen again.
The passenger only needs the perception of danger in his own mind to refuse to board.
Thankyou for that wonderful reply. Well done, you win a coconut.
nice:rolleyes:
cheers
Baz
I agree 100%, which is why this sentence makes no sense whatsoever:
To do a risk assessment requires a knowledge of the actual risks involved, otherwise it’s based on pure ignorance and means nothing. The average passenger knows absolutely zilch about aircraft beyond they generally have 2, 3 or 4 engines and go through the air, so therefore what are they basing their decision that the aircraft is unsafe on? I have to agree with previous comments, they should have boarded the flight or made their own way home. I can’t say the airline could have handled it better because I wasn’t there, but going on what we’re told there was no good reason whatsoever for passengers to refuse to board.
Paul
P.S. Apologies for bumping this week old thread. I saw this in a paper last week and I had a whinge about it then so thought I’d do the same here!
It made sense after drinking Spitfire Beer lunch time.
Apart from pointing out my usual bad english, you haven’t really added anthing useful to this thread except to whinge (your words)
cheers
Baz
Wow! these are great gents, thank you. Please keep them comming!
Baz, I hope for your wife’s sanity that you have a little more garden…………………if not fair play old fruit!
Kind Regards
Gav
Sacked wife:)
Bought Spitfire:diablo:
I thought Dog and handler were teamed for life, do they mix handlers??
I know two local Police dog handlers, they would be devastated if they lost a dog, the bond between dog and handler is too strong. There has to be more to it than that.
I hope so.
Baz
I thought Dog and handler were teamed for life, do they mix handlers??
I know two local Police dog handlers, they would be devastated if they lost a dog, the bond between dog and handler is too strong. There has to be more to it than that.
I hope so.
Baz
T6flyer Went past today and took this……
Martin……I was waving like mad…………you didn’t see me??
You can see the the tree felling just to the right of the approach, around my bungalow.
It has been amazing to learn how many of you guys actually own Spitfire replicas, the real thing or have project builds on the go.
Wpuld it be rude? inapropriate? to ask if any of you would post a few pics of your belved treasures? No problem if not, I just thought that it would be great to see what can be acheived with time, money and a bundle of will power.
Thanks
Gavin
cheers
Baz
How?
The difference between 17k and 24k gets you a real ppl
Sharing the ownership of a flying aircraft (rather than a 1/1 kit) makes lots of sense. You don’t need the £96k, all the bills are divided by four, you get to fly, not sit on the ground making ‘Brrrrrm’ noises through your lips
Moggy
Appreciate your sarcasm however, I fly as often as I like
cheers
Baz
Still in regular use i’m afraid – I bravely leaped out of her myself only the other month.
The classroom we used before the exercise had a display on the wall with several photos of her being lowered into the field by a SAR Sea King.
If it goes missing…….you’ll know where it is:dev2:
AHA………..Something else for the garden!!!:diablo:
Most people would accept the phrase ‘beauty is in the eye of the beholder,’ however psychologists have shown that there are things that we all tend to find beautiful.
Beauty it appears is dependent upon properties such as symmetry, complimentory colours, proportion etc. If you want to know more about the psychology of art and beauty than can I suggest two books. The first isVitruvius’s treatise on architecture that explains how proportions underpin our concept of architectural beauty. The second is Gombrich’s Art and Illusion that takes a wider brush approach to the psychology of art and with it beauty.
This would tend to support the conjecture that the afore mentioned phrase ‘beauty is in the eye of the beholder,’ refers more to diffirentiating say, between two beautiful women, or the Taj Mahal and the Chrysler Building, than to one person finding Marilyn Munroes stunning whilst someone else prefers a pile of dog pooh.
Steve
Gavin
I can see what happens if you repeat this post to your girlfriend, she will stare blankly at you for about thirty seconds, realise she has been compared to dog pooh…………..slap you into next week and ban sex for a month!