dark light

spitfireman

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,286 through 3,300 (of 3,375 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Whats wrong with this picture? #1207226
    spitfireman
    Participant

    and don’t give us a bum ‘steer’!:D

    in reply to: RAF Museum Hendon – 1970's #1207243
    spitfireman
    Participant

    this one

    in reply to: Spitfire MkI/II replica – who's markings? #1207542
    spitfireman
    Participant

    White smoke – Sunday!

    Sorry chaps, been diverted by other stuff. Will now knuckle down and finish sorting out paint scheme by Sunday.

    Port side definately Al Deere, trouble matching cam etc for starboard scheme, may have to cheat a bit.:)

    cheers
    Baz

    in reply to: James May flying u2 #1208416
    spitfireman
    Participant

    what??? :diablo: with the exception of my girlfriend the sound of a merlin is the only thing that gives me goosebumps?

    😀

    :diablo:with the exception of my ex-wife the sound of a steam train is the only thing that gives me a nervous twitch.:D

    in reply to: Aircraft demolition charge #1208455
    spitfireman
    Participant

    The difference, of course, was that the charge in the Spitfire, etc., wasn’t designed to destroy the airframe, solely the IFF transmitter.
    Edgar

    Quite right, the Germans had N3277 flying in a matter of a few weeks.

    in reply to: Spitfire Corner – Today! #1208464
    spitfireman
    Participant

    Another Canberra

    Outside my gaff today…………2 Canberras at Spitfire Corner!

    in reply to: Aircraft demolition charge #1208945
    spitfireman
    Participant

    This is Spitfire N3277 after force landing in northern France. The pilot had used the destructor charge in this aircraft

    in reply to: WW2 Decoy Hawker Hurricane #1211788
    spitfireman
    Participant

    That’s a great find, thanks for posting. It is amazing what wartime subjects make in onto such ‘light’ programming these days.

    The plans shown didn’t look like decoy plans to me, more like balsa-wood model plans but I could be wrong. The wartime decoy wouldn’t have had the box underneath (not sure why they built it that way) as the shadows a decoy cast, including the undercarriage, were as important as the general look of it.

    I doubt there was much of the decoy worth saving; unless you were interested in it as a decoy. It looked very shoddily covered and wouldn’t last long in any sort of weather.

    To get it to sit on an undercarriage would require a spar which would make it more complex and expensive. It was cheaper sat on the box. Your right, it would only be skip fodder.

    Proved the point though, nice to see

    in reply to: Spitfire Corner – Today! #1212621
    spitfireman
    Participant

    Canberra WD954

    Within the next few weeks my cockpit section will start receiving some TLC, building up to it’s respray into the black and grey she wore in the early fifties.

    Being an early Canberra she was fitted with a chin mounted pitot head, just behind the bomb aimers position. Is this a generic pitot tube and/or does anyone have a spare?

    The canopy is off a T/bird and at some stage I would like to change it back to a B2, again does anyone have one tucked away somewhere?

    Does anyone have any good pictures of WD954 when she was doing all that record breaking stuff in her early years?

    Any help appreciated

    cheers
    Baz

    in reply to: Spitfire MkI/II replica – who's markings? #1213867
    spitfireman
    Participant

    I’ve always had a soft spot for P9386, 19 Squadron with the yellow spinner IMO other than the “night & white” undersides, one of the few variations on dark earth/dark green of the period.

    Corgi did a very nice 1/32 scale die-cast of it a few years back, oversized yellow roundels as well, it just “looks” the part to me.

    Edit: apologies for trying to teach you to suck eggs – I just browsed your WWW page and saw the postcard of Brian Lane’s aircraft ! Look forward to seeing whatever scheme you choose.

    🙂

    in reply to: Spitfire MkI/II replica – who's markings? #1213877
    spitfireman
    Participant

    Why not 610 squadron that I think were based in Cornwall Devon at some point during the war. No access to books today so cant check but a quck internet check brought up the following .

    1940: Sgt/P R.F. Hamlyn (610 Sqn) becomes ‘Ace in a day’ (5 kills) R6891 DW-Q

    80244 Ronald Fairfax Hamlyn DFM (The Pied Piper) of Harrogate

    Joined No 610 Squadron on the 6th of June 1940 he was 23 years old. Hamlyn destroyed two enemy aircraft before the 24th of August. On the 24th of August he destroyed a Ju 88 and four Bf 109s. He was the first pilot in the RAf to shoot down five enemy aircraft in one day.

    Hamlyn then destroyed Bf 109s on the 26th, 27th, 28th and the 30th of August. Hamlyn was awarded the D.F.M. on the 13th of September 1940 and the A.F.C. on the 1st of January 1943.He rose to the rank of Wing Commander. He died on 7th May 1991.

    not the same airframe , but close…..

    in reply to: Spitfire MkI/II replica – who's markings? #1213882
    spitfireman
    Participant

    How about Eric Lock of 41 Squadron.
    A fantastic pilot and ace, very rarely see much about him.
    Another favourite would be Tim Vigors of 222 Squadron. I have just finished reading his book and can’t praise it highly enough.
    Gerry

    Eric Lock, a great pilot, what is the book on Tim Vigors??

    in reply to: Spitfire MkI/II replica – who's markings? #1213884
    spitfireman
    Participant

    How about doing it in Luftwaffe markings like the ones they captured, bet no one has done that before, hows that for thinking out of the box? Eh Baz;)

    aha! This one was captured and fitted with a smoke making device, featured in many German periodicals……but that’s not what you had in mind mien friend is it?.

    in reply to: Spitfire MkI/II replica – who's markings? #1213895
    spitfireman
    Participant

    Any OTU scheme – preferably like the AR213 Hawarden scheme with the slightly mental stripes on the nose….

    these one’s…………….no can do, needs to be green and brown……….

    in reply to: Spitfire MkI/II replica – who's markings? #1214236
    spitfireman
    Participant

    Spitfire paint job

    Some good ideas which had me rummaging through my books.

    On my MkIX, I put 2 different sqdns on, one either side which works quite well and I chose airframes of relatively ‘unknown’ pilots for the purpose of being original. I am thinking now of doing the same for my MkII. I still like the idea of Al Deeres ‘Kiwi’ on the port side and a toss up between Tuck or Robert Whittons idea of a 610 machine (with those over sized codes) the other. Problem with this is the spinner and propellers were a different make and shape, so purists will only be able to view one side:rolleyes:

    Thankyou for your inputs thus far, no final decision yet.

    cheers
    Baz

Viewing 15 posts - 3,286 through 3,300 (of 3,375 total)