dark light

spitfireman

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 3,375 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The death knell for many UK aviation events? #853845
    spitfireman
    Participant

    There are ways around some of these charges.

    The CAA won’t charge aircraft arriving at a show, departing a show, practicing circuits and bumps, joining (run and break), PFLs, etc. Stuff you can see at airfields all year round. You could narrow the published display time to 3 hours and operate normal airport/airfield activities outside of this. Wouldn’t worry me much, watching a B17 and a Lancaster flogging the same circuit and a Meteor joining overhead with a A400 training on the ILS. The circuits could be varied left or right and touch and go can be varied with a low approach and go round.
    Aircraft can land, park on the apron, whilst the crew stop and have lunch, with the added bonus that the crowd can take photos during this period. A NOTAM could stipulate no visitors during the display times but can resume after the Red arrows ‘finish’ the show.

    Anyway, just a thought.

    in reply to: 'New' Me 109 Photograph #854962
    spitfireman
    Participant

    I wiped the stain off.

    I have a couple of HeIII and Do17 flopped, I’ll have to dig them out

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]243670[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: "Upkeep" Lancaster with nose art – anyone know any more? #887393
    spitfireman
    Participant

    Its Joe Mccarthy’s Lancaster ED915.
    This is the final nose artwork, the photo shows artwork unfinished. His Lancaster went U/S on starting (for Chastise) and he took ED825 instead.[ATTACH=CONFIG]242626[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: RAF Mustang MK III project for sale #888251
    spitfireman
    Participant

    18 Aug. North American Mustang III FB206 (UZ-M) P/O F. Migos. KAS Collided in mid-air with a Spitfire (Sqn. 130) intruding 306 formation over Brenzett. Both a/c were lost.

    in reply to: General Discussion #235608
    spitfireman
    Participant

    Thought you was talking about the ship, it was parked next to me whilst on the Rangatiri, Falklands, 1982.

    in reply to: St. Edmund #1801812
    spitfireman
    Participant

    Thought you was talking about the ship, it was parked next to me whilst on the Rangatiri, Falklands, 1982.

    in reply to: Tim McClelland/Tim Laming #914693
    spitfireman
    Participant

    Tim always had a soft spot for RAF St Mawgan and was always interested in these threads.
    I once put up a thread on collecting those black plastic profile plaques produced in the 70s/80s, Tim pitched up at SpitfireCorner one summers day and handed over some I hadn’t got.

    When I see dayglo/red paint applied to historic aircraft, I always smile and think ‘nice one Tim’.

    This forum will be a little duller without him.

    Blue skies

    Baz

    in reply to: Edinburgh military tattoo – 'Spitfire' #894578
    spitfireman
    Participant
    in reply to: Spitfire under carriage blow down bottle #897152
    spitfireman
    Participant

    I could be wrong…….

    I think there is a (more) modern alternative, maybe something out off a Cessna twin that would fit.

    Bruce will know.

    Baz

    in reply to: General Discussion #252829
    spitfireman
    Participant

    Cadbury’s produced chocolate bars (as we know them) since 1897.

    in reply to: Protracted Production #1813251
    spitfireman
    Participant

    Cadbury’s produced chocolate bars (as we know them) since 1897.

    in reply to: General Discussion #256142
    spitfireman
    Participant

    Some years ago (1986) I met a Hood sailor who was (lucky) posted dreckly before the ship sailed for Bismark. He told me the ship was at flank speed when hit and as the engines and propellers were undamaged, it propelled the ship (with all of the damage) immediately underwater from which there was no recovery.

    in reply to: HMS Hood #1815598
    spitfireman
    Participant

    Some years ago (1986) I met a Hood sailor who was (lucky) posted dreckly before the ship sailed for Bismark. He told me the ship was at flank speed when hit and as the engines and propellers were undamaged, it propelled the ship (with all of the damage) immediately underwater from which there was no recovery.

    in reply to: Dambusters Remake Latest #919671
    spitfireman
    Participant
    in reply to: Dambusters Remake Latest #919986
    spitfireman
    Participant

    Dambusters film – about to be cancelled?

    Jackson whines he’s fed up with people asking “Are we there yet?”

    http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/adam-helliker/597109/Pater-Jackson-Dam-Busters-film-WW2

    Well, Mr Jackson you bought the rights to the film over ten years ago, we are sort of interested.

    Baz

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 3,375 total)