I’m uncomfortable with re-enactors generally.
What are they trying to demonstrate/prove?

There were however two re-enactors of dubious character seen in a Jeep at Old Warden yesterday.

Later.
A.

Ian
it was good to see you and your son again too.
If you keep showing up at gigs like this you’ll soon be regarded as a ‘clique’ member.
Come to another soon–please.
Cheers
Andy

You mean six or seven people carrying on a perpetual crusade for a ‘level playing field’ and the other several thousand getting on and discussing aviation?

Good point well made.

Moggy

So you really think it’s only six or seven people making a fuss?
Good point well made too I think.

I think it’s time a number of you stood up and got counted–afraid of something?

We are not the bad guys here, we really do not get a kick by banning people or deleting posts. Personally I would much rather prefer a quiet happy forum where deleted posts and banned members are but a distant memory.

Take it easy everyone

Webmaster

Well then it’s simple.
If you ain’t the bad guys and the moderators are so sure they’re so popular why don’t they suggest that they stand for re-election? After all, if someone is so sure of themselves they should be confident of getting re-elected.

However, I’m far from convinced that certain moderators have much confidence in that event and therfore prefer dictatorship. You see most people should never be given power of any kind–it’s a dangerous substance.

You can see the result of it here.

Thank you, Andy. Do make an effort to have correct information before making assumptions, yes?

The webmast banned Robbo all on his lonesome. It was not until hours later that Flood was looking at the mods forum and discovered Robbo had been banned. He had nothing to do with it. Robbo’s continued abuse and obsession with Flood got him banned.

That is accurate, correct information. If you truly wish to be reasonable you will see that.

So you’re seriously telling me that the webmaster worked out with no prompting by anyone that Rob’s spelling of Garvage was a play on words of your surname and then completely without any further outside influence banned Rob for two weeks.

He must be a genius to have lateral thinking like that.
I bet he can do The Times crossword in about two minutes!
He’s certainly wasted here.

By doing what? What exactly can any of you prove that he’s done? You spew abuse and trash about how bad he is, when you either A. Do not have correct information and B. Have simply made up his “crimes”.

How exactly does that work?

It’s time this ends and it’s up to you lot to end it. Grow up, or alternatively offer some proof that Flood is not suitable. And being bitter that you were banned, Ian is not proof. Sorry.

So he got Robbo banned for a lightly humorous twist on a surname?
Are you really going to say that doesn’t display some worrying characteristics?

More abuse? AIB- what happened to trying to be the “voice of reason”??
-Erin

Your partner kicked it to death.
Subtle isn’t he???

It’s a good point Andy, and from what I know from talking to a number of the mod’s, through one way or another they are as much in dispair over this as we are. It’s makes their job harder if they doen’t all follow the same hymn sheet, and like I say one rotten apple……….

I can think of one mod who steadfastly defended the rotten apple, he has certainly changed his tune in recent weeks.

Ian,
I’ve had one of them offer his job to me already today.
If it’s that bad, why do they stay doing it?