dark light

Andy in Beds

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,371 through 2,385 (of 3,233 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New Instrument Panel for Southern Cross #1388611
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    Seems Mr. Jones has retired for the evening…

    Don’t go to any trouble, but I do like a nice single malt scotch. Lagavulin, Ardbeg, Oban…of course a vodka martini can be very nice…

    After seeing the schedule that you have planned for us I don’t think there will be any time for cocktails!

    Lagavulin, Ardveg or the other one from Islay!!!!!!!

    in reply to: Some English Stuff #1389334
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    I think that is Steve Patterson flying the U Mk 8/9 Firefly 590. šŸ™‚
    Mark

    Oh don’t start him off on that one again Mark.
    I only had the temerity to mention the F-word to him once and I got an hour long lecture on why slow ‘airplanes’ are undesirable.

    This time it’ll be your fault. šŸ™‚ šŸ™‚ šŸ˜‰ šŸ˜‰ šŸ™‚ šŸ™‚

    in reply to: New Instrument Panel for Southern Cross #1389553
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    Yeah Yeah you keep saying that.

    If the Sea Fury isanything like as loud as a P-51 then you had probably a had a bit too much Scotch before you got in šŸ™‚

    Yeah, Patty has an impressive collection of fine wine, Beer and Whisky.
    It seemed impolite to refuse.
    It’s pretty loud in there but the headphones kept it under control.

    I still sometimes think, did that really happen to me.
    Apparently it did.
    Great!
    Andy

    in reply to: New Instrument Panel for Southern Cross #1389571
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    Hii

    There are nowhere near enough machines that go ping in there – you will never be able to show your face in the industry if it isn’t packed solid with thingys. There is no Ipod , No USB connectors, Wheres the Plasma TV , DVD player, X Box, Video camera – For gods sake man have you lost your senses – all there is to do in this damn thing is FLY THE PLANE!!!!

    Also Andy would like to see the Jacuizzi and Bar arrangements in the rear before he flies again and the rear seat should recline for those long distance naps.

    Seriously Steve this looks fine and very practicle to me except that I and a few eyesight challenged might have a little difficulty reading a couple of those instruments in a hurry.

    Regards
    Throghmorten Fitzmorris

    John
    I only had a little doze for about twenty minutes or so.
    It was a warm afternoon, the 3350 had settled into a rhythmic drone and he seemed to know what he was doing.
    I think the previous evening’s alcoholic samplings may have played their part too.
    Perhaps some gentle chamber music piped through the headphones might be soothing next time.

    The T-6 is too exciting to sleep in though.
    Later
    Andy

    in reply to: Red Bull P-38 #1391101
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    Oops, my bad…

    Lloyd George and…and…and that other guy

    Herbert Asquith–you tart.
    Don’t you know anything about your country’s history?
    Oh sorry, I forgot your not British you just spend 48 weeks a year here.
    Later
    A…

    in reply to: an invitation to bomb London #1392495
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    Many thanks Andy

    My comment re. bias not at al personal, I’ve never met the man. I did write to him once and got a fairly short (both meanings of the word) response – probably the millionth similar question šŸ˜‰ My observation is more about the perspective he takes which is very supportive of the various decisions taken by Portal, Harris et al – supportive in that he accepts them without seriously critiquing them (in the manner I might have expected a historical author to do). Perhaps on reflection the bias is mine! I may do a spot on navel gazing on that one.

    I agree re. the emotional connection and devotion to the task – empathy is perhaps the right term. I very much respect that. And IMHO there is a positive to his non-critiquing narrative style, it results in a simple lay out of the events from which the reader can draw his/her own conclusions.

    All the best, Don

    Don
    one last thought about Martin Middlebrook which has nothing to do with aviation. He does a talk on Commonwealth War Graves and cemeteries which lasts about 30 minutes. He gives details of the layouts, the headstone designs and the inscriptions on them. Until you’ve heard him deliver it in a field cemetry, somewhere like High Wood or Serre Road–well all the books he’s ever written don’t come close to that half hour.
    More on aviation soon.
    Andy

    in reply to: Red Bull P-38 #1392680
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    Will it be at Legends?

    When I implement my new 2005 policy of refusing to travel more than two miles in any direction to see aircraft fly, it will need to be at The London Gliding Club open day on Dunstable downs.
    Should look impressive operating off that big grass field.
    A…

    in reply to: Red Bull P-38 #1392853
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    That sounds pretty neat Steve. So presumably they’ll co-ordinate the messages on this flying billboard (what price ‘Red Bull gives you wings’!) with the pyros and smoke.

    Red Bull should be applauded for this innovative approach, bringing warbird operations more into the mainstream of public entertainment.

    Should brighten up Legends anyhow.

    in reply to: an invitation to bomb London #1393031
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    In. Your. Face.
    šŸ˜€

    Damien,
    are you not impressed and dare I say moved by the very gracious way I was able to admit I was less than perfect?????
    šŸ˜‰ šŸ˜‰ šŸ˜‰ šŸ™‚ šŸ™‚ šŸ™‚

    in reply to: Red Bull P-38 #1393044
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    Gawd elp us muvva he’s gawn maad!

    What, because I don’t know what ‘never knowingly undersold’ means?????
    I’m outraged!!
    A…

    in reply to: Red Bull P-38 #1393056
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    How about the Burger King Beech?

    Spud-U-Like Spitfire??
    Heinz 57 Hurricane???
    John Lewis Lancaster????
    The list is endless.
    Cheers
    Andy

    PS On the Lanc you could have the motto ‘Never knowingly undersold’ on the inside of the bomb bay doors so the words are displayed on those passes with the bay doors open.

    PPS What the f*ck does ‘never knowingly undersold’ actually mean?

    in reply to: an invitation to bomb London #1393090
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    Hi Don
    Yes, I’m very happy that a discussion on the forum has brought me back to Len Deighton’s book.
    By questioning it as closely as I have, I’ve got more from it than I would have otherwise if I’d just read it.
    I’m still taking the same approach even though I’m more than half way through it now.
    You are correct in saying that if I only write about what I disagree with I’ll have a small work load and the points I raise might appear to be nit-picking of the most highly developed kind.
    I want to say a few things later but they’re more for discussion than making a critical point.
    So, thanks for making me put up-or shut up.

    I’m not sure what bias Martin Middlebrook has. I once spent a week pounding the battlefields of Gallipoli with him and he’s quite an unusual character.
    He’s got a knack of rubbing most people up the wrong way in the shortest possible time to a degree that I’ve rarely seen. However he is totally sincere in his devotion to veterans of all wars and gets quite emotional about the loss of men in battle.
    He’s a great historian and writes from the heart as well as the mind.
    I’m not sure he has too much of an axe to grind in favour of the establishment, but I could be wrong there.

    John Terraine I never met, although he was president of the Western Front Association. I’ve always found his books to be reliably informative and he wasn’t afraid to disagree with what was the perceived truth.
    However I found his at times quite strident defence of Sir Douglas Haig a bit difficult to take, although I know this is isn’t the place to discuss Great War infantry tactics.
    Cheers
    Andy

    PS. I’m out tonight (and tomorrow) so my thoughts on the Junkers 87 in the Spanish Civil War may have to wait until Friday.

    in reply to: Red Bull P-38 #1393250
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    Andy, you’re hitting the irony fairly heavily tonight.

    I’ll be happy to see this ‘plane back in the skies. A wartime scheme would be lovely, but it’ll still be a flying P38 whatever the colour.

    Robbo
    It doesn’t bother me what colour any of them are painted in.
    They’re all just toys for the amusement of a few anyhow.
    So I don’t care really.
    Cheers
    Andy

    in reply to: Red Bull P-38 #1393254
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    Local colour.

    I love the Red Bull scheme.
    I reckon it’ll lok great.
    I’d like to see more warbirds in radical schemes.
    How about that La9 in Red Bull markings or even 434?

    Adds a bit of local colour.
    Cheers
    Andy

    in reply to: an invitation to bomb London #1394551
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    The First Instalment

    Hi all,
    As I said I would, I’m working my way through ā€˜Fighter’ by Len Deighton and on page 69 I came across the paragraph that originally started this whole thread and my re-visit to Mr Deighton’s work.
    As promised I will report back here with my full report on the book, which I have to say is much better than my apparently somewhat flawed memory would have me believe. However the paragraph on the Ruhr Raids of May 15th 1940 still seems somewhat controversial to me and for that reason I want to revive our previous discussion on the paragraph. I’ve reproduced the paragraph in full below in full below.

    Mr Deighton says:-
    ā€œThe French had argued desperately that air attacks upon the Ruhr could have no effect upon Guderian’s armoured invasion of France. The French were entirely right. The RAF official history admits that the bombers ā€˜achieved none of their objects. Industrial damage was negligible’ and goes on to explain that the greatest benefit expected from this opening shot of the strategic bombing of Germany was ā€˜an informal invitation to bomb London’. By this means it was hoped to divert the German air offensive away from French ground forces. To what extent this motive was arrived at after the raid failed to be anything better than a provocation, can only be guessedā€
    The reason I’ve put the last part of the paragraph in italics is that I was a little concerned as to where Mr Deighton sourced this last statement.
    The previous sentence is almost direct quotation from the official history but this part isn’t. My question was therefore this. Did Deighton hang a small but significant piece of his own opinion on the end of the paragraph? If he did he planted a seed in the readers mind that might lead one to believe that this was official policy.

    My first port of call was ā€˜The Right of the Line’ by John Terraine (Sceptre Ed. 1988) who quotes Air Marshal Sir Charles Portal who at the time was CIC Bomber Command.
    Portal dismissed close support as incapable of affecting this air situation, ā€œwhereas the bombing of objectives in Germany was likely, not only to damage the German war machine in general, but to force the Germans to withdraw fighters and flak from the front to the rear, and to divert their bombing offensives to objectives in Englandā€. (AHB/II/117/5(A) , p 278.-Via Terraine The R.O.T.L).

    Tonight I’ve also consulted ā€˜The Bomber Command War Diaries’ by Martin Middlebrook and Chris Everitt (Viking 1985) and they have a slightly different and significant slant on events.
    They point out that the German bombing of Rotterdam on May 14th may have had some influence on the decision to attack Germany on the following night and as the reader can see below, this new strategic offensive was short lived.

    They do agree that the raid of May 15th was a very significant event in Bomber Command’s war.
    ā€œThat date, 15th May 1940 was another of the great turning points of Bomber Command’s war. The R.A.F. commanders could finally start implementing their pre-war plans and the true strategic–bombing offensive against Germany began that night when most of the 108 aircraft allocated to operations were sent to industrial targets in Germany; it was the first occasion that more than 100 aircraft were dispatched. But the realities of the situation prevailed and, after only five nights of industrial bombing, the night bombers had to be brought back to attack bridges and communications nearer the battlefront. The full moon period in the second half of May was fully used for this purposeā€. (P.40 BCWD.—Middlebrook & Everitt)

    Middlebrook and Everitt also point out that the Blenheims of No 2 Group Bomber Command were very active in attacking tactical targets throughout the period.
    So in closing for tonight, I can have no real objection to what Len Deighton has to say in his book (up to the point I have read) and have to confess that he seems to be fairly accurate in his telling of events in May 1940 so far.

    Tomorrow, was the Stuka very influential in the Spanish Civil War (?) and the failings of the ME109.

    Cheers
    Andy
    PS Gnome, is this the sort of thing you wanted. It’ll take six months at this rate!

Viewing 15 posts - 2,371 through 2,385 (of 3,233 total)