..to Becka and Nick for organising the film show.
Attendance was a bit like a ‘Kamikaze Pilots reunion dinner’ but I for one greatly appreciated the chance to see ‘Angels one five’ in pin sharp black and white on the big screen.
Credits for the main participating aircraft always goes to the Portuguese Air Force for loaning five airworthy Hurricanes along with three from RAF stock. I had always suspected some Spitfires were used on set, apart from the period wartime footage, and sure enough at least two are clearly visible as back drop dressing. For this 1952 film, as high back aircraft, there is a good chance they were the exhibition flight aircraft K9942, X4590 or possibly P9444…..I feel some research coming on. π
A very enjoyable evening.
Mark
Hi
Yes, thanks to Becka and Nick
I really enjoyed seeing the film on the big screen and I didn’t get his name but would someone pass my thanks onto the projectionist who gave us such a wonderful tour of the projection room.
Many thanks, for those that didn’t attend you missed a good little afternoon.
Cheers
Andy π π π
RADAR…
Peter
Please don’t ask me to do the maths–it’s 11.15PM here now.
I too worked on RADAR once.
cheers
Andy
(ex Marconi boy)
601 Sqn.
Is this any help??
Lloyd Trigg attacked a U boat and though the Ventura aircraft was very badly damaged they pressed home the attack till the U boat was sunk. The plane crashed and all aboard died. It was the U boat commander who recommended the VC being awarded when he was picked up and made a prisoner, which is an incredibly sporting gesture after his submarine had been sunk.
Dave
I think you’ll find Flying Officer Trigg was flying a Liberator GR.V of 200 Sqn.
They were at the time based at Yumdum in The Gambia.
The action took place 240 miles South West of Dakar at 09.45 (local) on 11th August 1943.
Cheers
Andy
Walrus.
James
I agree.
Rather than people endlessly speculating about why this airframe or that airframe is/isn’t going to be al Duxford this year/next year why don’t they save up for a ticket and go to the country in question??
A bit of travel does after all broaden one’s horizons.
I think I shell stat saving for my 2006 ticket to NZ shortly–for WOW not the Walrus!!
Cheers
Andy
Superb work Geoff
Many thanks
Andy
In what way Phillip? Most posters here would disagree with you over the Bomber Command Hall I think. The way the Fairey Battle has been shoved in a corner behind some temporary fencing for months & months is disgraceful.
Perhaps you’d care to elabourate?
I disagree about the music too.
I’m not saying you want endless Vera Lynn or George Formby but some contemporary music for the period can really add a bit of atmosphere.
War being generally a young mans business, the music in my opinion should reflect that too.
My dad who was 18 in 1941 liked Jazz, Black Jazz and I suspect the wilder the better.
He thought Vera Lynn was for old fuddy-duddy types.
So how about a bit of Louis Armstrong playing in these places. I bet that’s what a lot of teenage aircrew were listening to.
Cheers
Andy
….or the dust covering them π
Saves on electric and cleaning!!
Can we all play too? Why only Β£20m? Why not Β£200m? Or while we’re at it, Β£2bn?
Mike
you need to double this–make 4bn!!
We could call it the Republic of East Anglia Air Force. You get to pick what we buy first!
Cheers
Andy π π π π π
I think the RAF Museumβs Bomber Command Hall has got it rightβ¦ (Same goes for the Battle of Britain Hall).
What, you mean it so dark one can’t see the exhibits??
Belt- or drum-fed? I almost dread to hear the answer…
Steve
if you’re refering to my post above. They were Lewis guns and therefore drum-fed. The RFC came up with a ninety seven round Lewis drum as opposed to the 47 round drum as used by the infantry.
As the Lewis gun had such a propensity for jamming I can’t imagine the whole 97 rounds were ever fired off without a hitch.
I think the 97 round drum was an invention by another NCO armourer, anyone got his name??
Cheers
Andy
Dolphin.
Ant
The Sopwith Dolphin.
This is taken from ‘Armament Of British Aircraft 1909-1939’ by H.F. King. (Putnams 1971)
“In No 87 Squadron the guns were transferred to fixed mountings on the lower wings, somewhat inboard of the inner pairs of interplane struts, where they fired outside the airscrew arc.
Hope this helps.
Andy
Technology…
Whalebone
I think if some sort of measurement of technological progress could be arrived at, you would also find that technology advanced as quickly between 1914-1918 as it did between 1939-45.
As Melv always points out The Great war lasted only 51 Months and in that time aircraft went from looking like The Bristol Boxkite to the HP V/1500 and Martinsyde Buzzard.
Quite some progress.
Andy
Hi James
yes appalling carnage, but there was always development going on.
This isn’t really the place for a debate on WW1 military tactics but the generals were really struggling to find a way to overcome problems that technology was throwing their way.
By 1918 Britain (and the commonwealth too) had managed to turn a large group of civilians into a very competent army indeed.
Using the very latest technology to defeat the Germans consistently in battle.
Perhaps the biggest tragedy of all was that all this expertise was demobbed damned quick after the armistice and the so called profesional soldiers went back to thinking that the next war could be won on horseback.
Hope this helps somewhere.
Andy
Geoff
try here mate
http://www.firstworldwar.com/audio/rosesofpicardy.htm
It worked on my machine.
I just wanted to sat also that while I would never downplay the efforts made by my Father’s generation between 1939 and 45, I find the events of 1914 to 1918 moving beyond words and that song gets me too.
Cheers
Andy