I enjoyed the Boulton-Paul heritage centre very much so I wish you the best of luck with the new project and look forward to seeing it.
There’s a Tornado in a scrapyard near Water Orton, Bimringham. You can see it from the M42. Makes me feel old to see them scrapped already but I suppose they have served far longer than many aircraft in former times that were obselete within a year or two of entering service due to advancing technology.
IIRC Cap de Gris Nez is the nearest point. It’s still festooned with bunkers and there are other interesting memorials such as to the Dover Patrol plus a statue of Napoleon.
Terrific poem. Such a pity that the author and the pub where Jack Stafford saw it are no longer known.
Diver
Having recently done some writing on the subject of Typhoons engaged in anti-diver ops, I found the best books on the V1 subject were “Flying Bombs Over England” by HE Bates, the excellent “Doodlebugs and Rockets” by Bob Ogley (both by Froglets Publications based in Kent) and “Tempest Over Europe” by Roland Beamont (Airlife). Not sure which of these is still in print.
Great pictures. That museum is very well lit and with lots of room to view the exhibits. The IAF has done a veyr good job of preserving it’s history.
Thanks for confirming that Tony. I assume it’s a misprint. 20 rpg would have been about one burst from each cannon!
[QUOTE=atc pal]Must have been “Bud” Holland. There is a very interesting professional study into the whole story of “Bud” breaking rules for a number of years:
Darker Shades of Blue:
A Case Study of Failed Leadership
By
Major Tony Kern
United States Air Force
http://s92270093.onlinehome.us/crmdevel/resources/paper/darkblue/darkblue.htm
Thanks for including this link. The study contains lots of material about good leadership and conveys very well how that pilot was an accident waiting to happen. Just a shame he took three other officers with him.
In his book “Meteor””, Brian Philpott relates that the Meteor was originally to be fitted with 6 Hispanos carrying only 20 rounds per gun. If this is true and not a misprint for 120, I don’t know whether they would have had a short belt or a box magazine. Maybe there are some of these smaller box mags around as they might have been used in another application of the Hispano. Luckily sense prevailed and the Meteor got 4 cannon with 120 or 150 rpg.
A terrific museum – very well laid out with so many rare aircraft that are well-looked after. You get a chance to see the interior of the Sandringham, as well, which is very impressive indeed. It’s down a minor road though and not well sign-posted so worth getting directions from tourist information if you don’t know the area.
Great to see a thread remembering the harsh conditions that “erks” worked in. The life of groundcrews was dangerous as well as uncomfortable. Propellors, collapsing undercarriages, bomb-releases, accidental discharges of firearms and premature explosions of bombs, mines or rockets claimed many lives and crippled others. The practice of sitting on the wing to guide a taxiing pilot was also hazardous.
My point on the naming of aircraft was that British and Commonwealth planes are always referred to by names, if they ever had numbers whilst in development then these are long-forgotten. Axis and US planes are primarily known by numbers and letters and rarely referred to by names (e.g. an Me110 hardly ever gets called a “Zerstorer”). That’s why it’s sad modern RR engines and BAE planes don’t get impressive names instead of numbers.
Is Britain (and commonwealth countries) unique in referring to aircraft by names (e.g. Spitfire or Boomerang) rather than numbers (e.g. Bf109 or P51)?
Lots of Spits and P51s flying already so I’d put something in the air that isn’t flying already: a Typhoon, a Wellington or Whirlwind (probably have to be scratch-built so need a rollover week on the lottery). Was watching footage of the Wellingtons fitted with the magnetic-mine rings on TV today (can’t remember the technical term). I imagine one of those would be a quite a crowd-pleaser at any airshow!
It would be terrific to see a Stuka flying, especially if it was allowed to dive in the way it was designed to! I have a 1942 copy of Aeroplane in which there is much discussion as to whether the Axis are deliberately overrating the success of the Stuka in order to encourage the Allies to waste time and materials building their own dive-bombers instead of more effective aircraft. Still, when I read what Rudel achieved in his, I have to admit it was an astonishing weapon if employed in the right environment.