dark light

AlanR

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,746 through 2,760 (of 5,556 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Revamp at the RAF Museum, Hendon #924757
    AlanR
    Participant

    Well “WH904”, you’ve pretty well summed up my thoughts of today’s visit.

    My overwhelming memory of today’s experience, will be having my ears assaulted by screaming children. Children of
    an age where they have no interest whatsoever of anything aviation related. There was also a coachload of teenage
    school children who seemed to have little interest in looking at exhibits. Also a big party of ATC cadets, whom I would
    assume had some interest.
    Finally a party of cubs and brownies, who were well behaved and supervised, but still not really of an age where I would
    think they took much in.

    There was nowhere to sit and eat at the coffee bar, so we went to the cafe. Hardly anyone in there, apart from a couple
    of screaming brats running amok, who were being ignored by their mothers.

    (Stands by to receive accusations of hating children)

    Right, now I’ve got that off my chest, my observations about the museum itself. As I said previously, the lighting didn’t
    worry me too much, apart from when taking pictures.
    It was annoying being asked to leave the BoB hall, as a film presentation was about to begin.

    It’d difficult to be objective about the museum as a whole, without making comparisons. Obviously a lot of thought has
    gone into how the aircraft are positioned, and they have done the best they can in the space available.
    I just find it very claustrophobic and sterile. Having recently been to OW, and a few trips to Duxford this year, where
    you can look at aircraft which actually fly, and smell like aircraft, I find Hendon very two dimensional.

    Maybe as aircraft enthusiasts we are spoilt ? Hendon isn’t just for aircraft fanatics, but for everyone. In a similar way perhaps
    that seaside airshows attract people from all walks of life. .

    The big plus for me, is being able to see so many German WWII aircraft, and RAF types come to that, which I am not
    able to see anywhere else. Wouldn’t it be great to see some of them where they really belong, in the air.

    in reply to: Revamp at the RAF Museum, Hendon #924845
    AlanR
    Participant

    Well we spent just over five hours there today, and still had a job to see everything.
    I’ll say more later, but regarding the lighting. To me it was only a problem from the photographic point of view.
    Constantly having to change settings on camera.

    Off out for a late Sunday lunch.

    in reply to: Revamp at the RAF Museum, Hendon #925067
    AlanR
    Participant

    I think we shall pay a visit today.
    Havent been to Hendon for about seven years.

    in reply to: Chuck Berry…… #1839975
    AlanR
    Participant

    Didn’t realize he was still alive .

    in reply to: Golden Apple Operations F-86A Sabre – Farewell Video #925817
    AlanR
    Participant

    What a great shame. What is the reason for her departure ?

    in reply to: Tele Extenders #443408
    AlanR
    Participant

    Thanks for the advice Tony and Jur, it sounds as though you know what you are talking about.
    I was only thinking in terms of a 1.4 converter, but may now shelve the idea, and save myself some money.

    Cheers

    P.S. My Nikkor telephoto zoom is f4.5 – f5.6

    in reply to: Season Highs & Lows #926356
    AlanR
    Participant

    High’s
    First visit to Eastbourne airshow. A great day with the two Lancs etc…
    Lancs coming to Southend (twice), although I only saw them on their second visit.
    Going to three pr-airshow days at Duxford.
    First visit to OW for around 40yrs. An absolutely brilliant race day.

    Low’s
    Not seeing XH558, must correct that asap.
    Canadian Lanc going home. 🙁
    Connie arriving at Duxford about 10 minutes after we left.

    in reply to: RAF Museum – An Interesting Development #926520
    AlanR
    Participant

    Did he jump, or was he pushed ?

    in reply to: NATO Day 2014, Ostrava, Czech Republic #459492
    AlanR
    Participant

    Nice variety of aircraft.

    in reply to: The merged UKIP thread #1840383
    AlanR
    Participant

    Polling results extrapolated to general elections are notoriously inaccurate.

    Yes, that has been proved time and time again.
    There’s no doubt though, that both Labour and Conservative have been put on the back foot, as regards UKIP.
    It’s not so much that people want to see UKIP in power (which is extremely unlikely to happen), it’s just as someone said on
    the TV the other day, “I’m sick of the Eton/Harrow fraternity, running the country for their own benefit”

    As I said before, the government and the BBC will be pulling out all the stops between now and next May, to rubbish
    UKIP in every conceivable way.
    This week’s Panorama programme was a pretty clumsy and obvious attempt at doing just that.

    They still fail to appreciate that the general public are quite capable of making up their own minds.

    in reply to: The merged UKIP thread #1840391
    AlanR
    Participant

    Regarding the Panorama programme this week. The BBC still don’t seem get it.

    Surely they and the rest of the media realize by now, that every attempt to rubbish Farage and UKIP,
    secures more votes for his party.

    Heaven only know what else they will dream up before next month’s by-election ?

    in reply to: RAF Museum – An Interesting Development #927250
    AlanR
    Participant

    Good luck to him in his next job.

    in reply to: Red Arrows – are Danish F-16s the replacement? #2216924
    AlanR
    Participant

    or just order the Allenia/AerMacchi M345, the Frecce Tricolori bought them, and i think they will fit the Red Arrows perfectly. Its cheap, easy to fly and maintain and very reliable.

    I’d love to see that, as it’s an aircraft more suited for aerobatics than the Hawk.

    It’ll never happen though, unless the Red Arrows were privatised.

    in reply to: Tele Extenders #443423
    AlanR
    Participant

    Thanks Tony,

    I was aware of the dangers of possible damage, if used on the wrong lens.

    I use a Nikon 55-300 lens on a Nikon camera, so would probably only go with a Nikon extender, to keep everything
    compatible (if I should go down that route at a later date).

    I know from my old 35mm days how much camera shake you can get if you try to over do it. As well as the
    light issues. They reckon that with the 1.4 extender you will lose one stop, with a slight degradation in picture
    quality at full magnification.
    I appreciate they will always be a compromise, but can come in handy, while not taking up a lot of space.

    in reply to: Tele Extenders #443431
    AlanR
    Participant

    I take it that’s a no ?

Viewing 15 posts - 2,746 through 2,760 (of 5,556 total)