I missed this, but no doubt it will be repeated.

I do wonder how many more programmes like this they can make ? :rolleyes:

The article doesn’t actually say how many of the aircraft are destined for the
Red Arrows. Unless they all have high hours on them ?

I made my donation at Stow Maries last week, I doubt they took any money from the cadets. 😉

……. All I can say its a good thing that the family and friends of the deceased and injured almost certainly will not read what has been said here………

Which is really the crux of the matter.

It doesn’t upset me if someone speculates as to the cause of an accident.

It does get rather silly, when for instance there is film of a part falling from an
aircraft, and a poster gets verbal abuse for suggesting that may have been
the cause of the accident. Are people really that touchy feely, or are they
after the moral high ground ?

It would perhaps save a lot of arguments, if it were left to the moderators to
do the moderating ?
With others keeping their comments to the subject in hand, rather than telling
others what they should think, and what they consider to be bad taste.

Whenever there is an accident, whether it be air, road or sea, people will
speculate as to the cause. If I were unlucky enough to have a relative killed in
an accident, the last thing I would do is trawl through Internet forums to see
what others thought the reason was.

Is this 50% to Tesco charity a national policy, plus who decides on the charity?

Storm in a tea cup? If this is true then people are giving money to charity under false pretences, I for one would be livid if I thought I was giving money to one charity for half of it to be directed to another which I may not for any number of reasons object to.

I quite agree.

Easy way round this annoyance, use Firefox and get the add on AdBlock Plus, bingo no-ads

Yep works for me. 🙂