Dzien Dobry Grzegorz,
I have also seen some of Antoni Gorczycki’s documents relating to a time in Stalag Luft – Antoni’s Grandson is a co owner of our Auster (VX927!)
I would be very interested to know if Jakimowicz, Picho & Raczynski are still alive but I have no idea where to start.
I plan to go to the 300 Sqn memorial service at Faldingworth on May 21st so perhaps someone there will be able to help.
Does anyone else on here have any leads?
Also, does anyone know how I might find out if the crash site was ever excavated?
…in Norwegian, presumably….
No… Its in English.
THANK YOU…
Thank you to all of you who have taken the time to vote. Its been a great help.
I have had a fantastic response to this thread and have received some really nice PM’s. Thank you. I’ve also have someone offer to do some work with the charity which will really help us improve our profile. Hopefully I will be able to show you the results of that at some point in the future.
Voting ends on the 28th April so not long left. I’m not going to abuse my position here and keep asking you all to vote, however I do want to say thank you… Both for the PM’s and the replies written in this thread.
Next time we have a charity day I’ll try and get some pics and post them here for you all to see.
Thank you once again.
Mark
it looks exactly the same as it did in 2000 when i saw it last,maybe a few added panels,the story then was ‘we are waiting for the engine’…save yourself the time and effort and wait for East Kirkby’s Lancaster NX611 to fly as you have more chance of that happening than MW763 flying,Concorde has more chance of flying…
elmo
Another well informed forum member!
Fantastic… Thats very nice.
Thanks Nashio,
Now I get it. The theory being that even with the engine off and the belt moving, the aircraft will remain stationary and the wheels will simply turn. Engine on and it will move forward. I think reality is that the aircraft would travel backwards along the conveyor belt, but at least I get the theory.
Mmm – Time for a beer!
The Hunter went for £5000, didn’t manage to get any other prices.
A long way short of the £12,000 reserve +15% +20%… £16,500 seems like an awful lot of money for a scrap hunter to me!
Any idea what the lightning cockpit made?
With any experiment we have to make some assumptions, or have a control… I read this with the assumption that any forward movement by the aircraft on its wheels is equalled by the reverse movement of the treadmill on which the aircraft is standing. I also assume zero wind. Final assumption is that we’re looking for the aircraft to fly through conventional means… By that I mean we’re looking for the wing to produce the lift, not the engine.
The engine is simply a means of propelling the aircraft through the air so that the wing can generate lift.
The wheels are simply a mechanism to allow the aircraft the travel along the ground in order that air can flow over the wings, thus producing a change is pressure, and thus producing lift. If any forward movement of the aircraft is equally countered by opposite movement of the ground (the treadmill), then how does the aircraft get the necessary airflow over the wing to produce the lift?
None of the answers I’ve read actually answer that question? Lift is produced by airflow over the wing. The aircraft doesn’t move the air because it’s forward movement is equalled by a reverse movement of the ground. Therefore the aircraft cant fly. The only way I can see the aircraft flying is if the airflow produced by the prop pulling air over the wing were sufficient to create that change in pressure, but in most cases that would not happen.
Another scenario… If my aircraft gets airborne at 35Kts, and I travel down the runway with a 35Kt tail wind, will the aircraft fly?… NO. because there isn’t the necessary fly of air over the wing.
Assuming that you guys are right, then what part of my logic breaks down?
I must confess, I dont get it? Maybe because it’s 1am, and I should be sleeping, but lift is caused by airflow over the wings…. Its nothing to do with the engine. The engine simply provides forward movement through the air to allow the air to pass over the wing.
If you assume that there is no wind, then what causes the airflow over the wing? The ‘treadmill’ cancels out any forward movement, the aircrafts position relative to the runway remains the same and thus there is no increase in airflow.
If you liken it to a person running on a treadmill. If you run on the open road you’ll feel air passing over your face…. You can run at any speed on a treadmill, but you will never feel any movement of air passing you.
How does the aircraft take off? Unless someone else know another way to take off without air passing over the surface of the wing, then I dont see how it’s possible.
Good news. Well done.
The H&S police are going to have a field day:eek:
Rightly so I’d say… Given the numbers of people still suffering from asbestosis. The risks are increased in this case because of the effects of fire on bonded asbestos!
Still, i hope the building can be saved. Given what happened at Hemswell, this could have been a lot worse.
I cannot see anyone using their new-found insurance money repairing this building, while it will be cheaper to start afresh. That is what happened at former RAF Hemswell.
The only slight difference was that the structure was unsafe at Hemswell and had to come down regardless of insurance. IF the hangar at Binbrook is safe then the insurance company will decide what happens to it… repair or rebuild…
Cool, I still have many Terrane mugs going back to the Finningley airshow days still gracing my kitchen cupboard! would you possibly consider letting me re-home said badge? 🙂
Let me see what I’ve got first:)
I may have one (or two!) – My parents own terrane limited and I’m sure I kept a couple of them when they first came out. I only have a hand full of badges but I’m sure I kept one of the 55sqn ones because it was one of the few patches they made with a Victor on it!
So how many are you looking for?