Ironically, shouldn’t this discussion have been moved to the general discussion section? 🙂
Regardless of 33 years of service and possible incidents, I wasn’t refereing to that, just a sad sight being dismantled.
Is it though? I’m not talking so much about this particular aircraft, but aircraft like this. Look through the pictures on A.net and PP.net of aircraft in the desert, and see how many occurrances there are of the word “sad”. I just don’t think aircraft, like any other machine, can have this much emotion attached to them.
I enjoy driving my car, and in a couple of years when I replace it I might be sorry to see it go, but it’s a machine. It doesn’t have a soul, and many of it’s parts will be reused in some capacity (either in their original form, or melted down and recycled).
I can’t really buy into this notion that an aircraft being broken up is “sad”.
Let’s not forget this aircraft was 33 years old and will have flown an incomprehensible number of cycles. It’s a feat of engineering considering my TV will do well to last 5 years!
Why don’t you indulge me and “shoot to pieces” the argument again?
The fact remains that London does not have enough runways for either it’s population or for it’s future status as a major hub.
This data is completely meaningless…
If we’re going to include Teterboro and Le Bourget where almost no commercial services operate, then we need to include Northolt, Biggin Hill, Farnborough, and Luton… Duxford? Cambridge? Southend?
This list means nothing without context
Beautiful shots – that last EZY one looks fantastic!
How many hours of daylight do you get up there over winter?
Andrew
We’re getting a nice response to this 🙂
Since people seem to want to post more than one shot, here’s a few more of mine…
This is AP-BHX, passing through Manchester on its delivery flight
Still eager to get ideas for next week’s airline…
METAR MKJP 230300Z 32008KT 3000 +SHRA BKN014 FEW016CB SCT030 BKN100 21/20 Q1014 RETSRA
With the exception of “Recent Weather” that doesn’t look too bad… does it?
Wrong kind of snow…
The website is now down. No message, just all the web files removed
All planes are expected to remain grounded for up to an hour while snow and ice are cleared off runway one – the only runway being used over the Christmas period
Runway One? Last time I checked they were on 23 and 05 L and R… new crosswind operation sponsored by BSkyB?
And this one i guess… since nobody else has posted it yet…
Only ever shot a few GSM aircraft, but flew with them about 5 years ago on one of their 737-600s from London to Edinburgh. Quite honestly the best low fares airline I’ve ever flown with, and it’s a real shame to see them go!
It makes me worry a little bit. They were always very honest. The fares were low but reasonable, and (when i flew with them 5 years ago) the service was excellent.
Anyway, here’s my contribution… nothing new to add i’m afraid 🙁
Andrew
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Do+they+have+airside+buses+to+the+terminal+at+Milan
That search brings up:
http://www.airlinequality.com/Airports/Airport_forum/bgy.htmSimple answer, yes…They are not going to make you walk about a mile in the rain…
Question for you Tommy, you ever heard of Google?
Sorry to say it, but you shot yourself in the foot a bit there!
He was asking for feedback from people who used the airports who, like you say, know a little bit of the back groud (rather than angry FR passengers who’ve been moved around like cattle and therefore may have a blinkered view of what the AIRPORT is like).
Thereby making the (slightly arrogant) LMGIFY reference both demeaning and unnecessary!
My understanding is that the publicised departure time has no baring on the slot…
Doesn’t the company have to request the slot, about 40 minutes before they’re ready to leave?
Sorry if i’m way off the mark here…
It is strange seeing as BA, Air NZ, Cathay Pacific, Emirates, PIA, Air Canada, Air India and Air France all operate 200s and 300, why are they so unpopular in their home market?
BA Don’t…