Any bets on how long before it’s a Hollywood movie???

A bit like miracle landing, only well acted 😉

Interesting how he says…

…how is this stunt going to lower the cost of air travel?:confused:

Surely if it is to be believed, there has got to be some ‘human rights’ issue attached to this as they would not be able to get away with charging people to use the toliet.

Not sure about this… they get away with charging 30p to use the toilets at Liverpool street station…

Thanks all! It’s impossible not to love those Titan colours!

Great looking 757 there, who does that belong to? 😀

It’s Mid East Jet. Quite pleased with that shot actually, because the aircraft came in very high and I was a bit concerned it would look a bit under the belly

I really don’t see how this can work!

What about people who don’t have internet access? Doesn’t this rather alienate a fairly huge swaithe of the population? I mean I can buy my granny a ticket and send her the confirmation by post, but when we start mailing boarding cards doesn’t it start to get a bit iffy?

I know that in the states the check-youself-in-machines at the airport are quite popular… wouldn’t that be a better happy medium?

Under what circumstances would one need to make use of a service like this?

Most ryanair flights are less than 2 hours… surely people don’t need to make calls in that time? do they?

At least i won’t have to turn my phone off when i get on board anymore

If anything, I’d say the velcro is more useful 😀

True, it was interesting, but hardly unique to the A380… in fact all of these technologies bar the composite fuselage could be applied to the A318!

They should be landing on 27L this morning; they were yesterday 😉

It’s also very easy to shoot something that big as it gets airbourne of 9R (probably easier actually – i find it a bit big to shoot on approach)

Andrew

…plus a few scans from 1989 and 2001…

Love seeing some of that “old” stuff… by most standards 2002 isn’t that long ago, but theres a whole load of stuff there that we never see anymore!

I presume you meant 1999 and 2001, not 1989??